By: Express News Service |
Published on:March 9, 2015 12:00 am
There is an urgent need to debate the rising defence pension
bill. In 2004, a debate over the mounting civilian pension bill led to
the New Pension System for government employees, where pension
contributions were defined and not benefits. But the armed forces were
excluded from that system. Now, a beginning can be made by including
pensions in the official defence budget.
In 1985, when Rajiv Gandhi was prime minister, defence pensions were removed from India’s overall defence expenditure, presumably to assuage global concerns about India’s defence bill, which was linked to its regional ambitions. The defence expenditure was then 3.6 per cent of India’s GDP. When that ratio has now come down to 1.75 per cent, the lowest in the post-1962 era, defence pensions still continue to be excluded from the defence bill. Over the years, defence pensions have grown exponentially — from Rs 1,670 crore in 1990-91 to Rs 15,244 crore in 2007-08 to Rs 50,000 crore in the current year — at a much faster pace than the defence budget. Next year, defence pensions are budgeted at Rs 54,500 crore, placed outside the official defence budget of Rs 2,46,727 crore. The pension bill is likely to rise by another Rs 8,400 crore with the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) scheme for military veterans. Every successive Pay Commission has raised the pension burden exponentially and the Seventh Pay Commission, coupled with the effect of OROP, will hit the exchequer even harder.
Approximately 60,000 soldiers retire from the 1.3 million-strong armed forces every year but early recruitment and retirement age, coupled with increased life expectancy, means that military veterans get pensions for a longer period than their civilian counterparts. Thus India now has 1.7 defence pensioners on its rolls for every serving soldier, compared to civilian employees where the ratio is 0.56 pensioners per employee, and defence pensions will soon exceed defence salaries. Even if military veterans and soldiers can’t be moved to a New Pension System, there is a need to look at other measures, such as reducing the minimum military service period, pushing for early retirement with lateral absorption schemes and identifying a new model of defence pensions for new recruits. These are desirable not only on the grounds of fiscal prudence, but also to keep the military lean and young.
http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/
In 1985, when Rajiv Gandhi was prime minister, defence pensions were removed from India’s overall defence expenditure, presumably to assuage global concerns about India’s defence bill, which was linked to its regional ambitions. The defence expenditure was then 3.6 per cent of India’s GDP. When that ratio has now come down to 1.75 per cent, the lowest in the post-1962 era, defence pensions still continue to be excluded from the defence bill. Over the years, defence pensions have grown exponentially — from Rs 1,670 crore in 1990-91 to Rs 15,244 crore in 2007-08 to Rs 50,000 crore in the current year — at a much faster pace than the defence budget. Next year, defence pensions are budgeted at Rs 54,500 crore, placed outside the official defence budget of Rs 2,46,727 crore. The pension bill is likely to rise by another Rs 8,400 crore with the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) scheme for military veterans. Every successive Pay Commission has raised the pension burden exponentially and the Seventh Pay Commission, coupled with the effect of OROP, will hit the exchequer even harder.
Approximately 60,000 soldiers retire from the 1.3 million-strong armed forces every year but early recruitment and retirement age, coupled with increased life expectancy, means that military veterans get pensions for a longer period than their civilian counterparts. Thus India now has 1.7 defence pensioners on its rolls for every serving soldier, compared to civilian employees where the ratio is 0.56 pensioners per employee, and defence pensions will soon exceed defence salaries. Even if military veterans and soldiers can’t be moved to a New Pension System, there is a need to look at other measures, such as reducing the minimum military service period, pushing for early retirement with lateral absorption schemes and identifying a new model of defence pensions for new recruits. These are desirable not only on the grounds of fiscal prudence, but also to keep the military lean and young.
http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/
1. First of all the life expectancy of military pensioners less than that of his civilian counterpart. Refer 5th pay commission's study.
ReplyDeleteIf the statistics are presumed to be correct and the plight of forces against odd situations is taken on to considaration any meaningful formulee with open mind may lead to clean the year long system
ReplyDeleteThe proxy war India is fighting for the last decades to defend our Motherland, is also responsible for inflated budget and not due to increase in the salary and pension of our Armed Forces. In spite of their hard living conditions, they are still lowest paid comparatively to their counter parts in the civil.
ReplyDeletePl. donot show military pensions as evil. The people of this country paying their obligation to soldiers in the form of decent welfare and pensions to veterans. Donot compare pensions of civilians, as they retire at 60 s, and donot live long enough, to increase pension expenditure. Solution: Like education cess on taxes,government can start a new tax, named military pension cess, on all taxes paid to government
ReplyDeleteIndian Express is notorious for creating national insecurities by encouraging views that add on to insecurities of a section of Neta - Babu combination that Benefits from such one sided views. They will conveniently remain silent on increase in pensionery benefits to the bureaucracy on increasing pension from 33 to 50 percent and now want a debate on military pension after reducing it from 75 to 50 percent . Remember the coup news during Gen VK's tenure when there were more than 15000 troops already stationed in Delhi. Apparently they are more concerned about bureaucratic security over national security . Even animals resent unequal treatment . The debate should be on looting of national resources by a section in the corridors of power with the tacit silence of the print media and not on military pension
ReplyDelete