ANIMATION

  • FLASH

  • WATCH THIS BLOG REGULARLY FOR LATEST NEWS ON ONE RANK ONE PENSION & OTHER SERVICE BENEFITS RELATING TO EX-SERVICE PENSIONERS,CENTRAL GOVT PENSIONERS,LIC/GIC PENSIONERS* A UNIQUE BLOG WITH MORE THAN 1 CRORE VIEWERS & 700 FOLLOWERS #

    FLASH

  • FlashFLASH* NAVAL SAILORS WHO JOINED ON OR BEFORE 03/07/1976 & DISCHARGED ON COMPLETION OF THEIR TERM OF ENGAGEMENT AFTER 10 YEARS ARE ELIGIBLE FOR SPECIAL PENSION AS PER SC JUDGEMENT IN CIVIL APPEAL 2147/2011 New **** L*OROP CASE NEXT HEARING LIKELY ON 15/12/2017
  • New











    .
  • Tuesday, 24 March 2015

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
    CIVIL APPEAL NO.(S). 8875-8876 OF 2011
    UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s)
    VERSUS
    VINOD KUMAR JAIN & ORS. Respondent(s)
    WITH
    C.A. No.1998 of 2012,
    C.A.No.3564 of 2012,
    C.A.No.3907 of 2012,
    C.A.No.4581 of 2012,
    C.A.No.4952 of 2012,
    C.A.No.4980 of 2012,
    C.A.No.4599 of 2013,
    C.A.No.1 of 2015
    AND
    SLP(C)Nos.36148-36150 of 2013,
    SLP(C)No.16780-16782 of 2014 &
    SLP(C)No......... of 2015 (CC Nos.16903-16904)
    O R D E R
    Heard.
    Delay condoned.
    C.A.Nos.8875-76 of 2011, C.A. No.1998 of 2012, C.A.No.3564 of 2012, C.A.No.3907 of 2012, C.A.No.4581 of 2012, C.A.No.4952 of 2012, C.A.No.4980 of 2012:
    We see no reason to interfere with the orders impugned.
    The civil appeals are accordingly dismissed.
    C.A.No.4599 of 2013, C.A.No.1 of 2015 :
    No substantial question of law of general/public importance arises for our consideration in these applications for leave to appeal. 
    The prayer for leave to appeal is accordingly declined and the applications for leave to appeal dismissed.
    SLP(C)Nos.36148-36150 of 2013 SLP(C)No.16780-16782 of 2014 & SLP(C)Nos...........of 2015 (CC Nos.16903-16904):
    We see no reason to interfere with the orders impugned.
    The special leave petitions are accordingly dismissed.
    Ms. Pinky Anand, learned Additional Solicitor General,
    however submits that in view of the nature of the controversy  as also the extent of financial burden arising out of the implementation of the impugned orders, the petitioners-U.O.I.
    may be given reasonable time to do the needful. That prayer is not opposed by counsel opposite.
    We accordingly grant four months' time from today to the petitioners to comply with the impugned orders failing which the contempt petitions pending before the Tribunal can be revived by the concerned petitioners and taken to their logical conclusion.
    All impleading and intervention applications are also dismissed.

    .......................J
    (T.S. THAKUR)
    .......................J
    (R. BANUMATHI)
    NEW DELHI
    DATED 17th March, 2015.

    5 comments :

    1. The language above could be understand. It would be kind enough, if any one can translate in simple language.

      ReplyDelete
    2. thanks m.b sir your information

      ReplyDelete
    3. Dear menonji, Is it binding on the govt to give 50% pension to all pre2006 pensioners with 20yrs service in 4 months? Is any prayer in these SLPs pertain to ALL the pre2006 pensioners in general?

      ReplyDelete
    4. The Judgement is a great relief,but we have to wait for clearance of contempt petition pending before the CAT PB

      ReplyDelete
    5. Not at all happy! Lot of difference in the outcome vis a vis what happened during the proceedings. WHICH CPs ARE PENDING in which TRIBUNALS? Who are the "concerned petitioners' of such CPs? -V Natarajan

      ReplyDelete