Dear Colleagues,
Of
late there has been a flurry of emails on OROP. Seeing that it affects
all of us, the interest OROP has generated is fully understandable.
OROP
started its journey in the early Nineteen-Eighties. Since then many had
been pursuing it. Notable among them is senior Veteran Col Inderjit
Singh, who has been doggedly chipping away at the government
resistance and pushing for OROP in his quiet dignified way. He would be
remembered with great admiration by the future generations.
From
2008 onwards, the IESM put fresh fuel in the fight for OROP. Ours was a
mix of presentations and protests, of meetings, memoranda and medal
deposits running simultaneously; pressure and persuasion. Meetings also
took place with various political leaders. This included Mr LK Advani,
Mr Rajnath Singh when he was BJP President, Mr Nitin Gadkari, Ms Sushman
Swaraj, Ms Supriya Sule and many others.
The
Rajya Sabha Petitions Committee, which itself was the result of
efforts by the MP, Mr Chandrashekhar, came as a shot in the arm. Among
others the IESM delegation too made a presentation to the Committee.
Some of us also worked behind the scenes. A couple of meetings at the
residence of Shri Bhagat Singh Koshyari, who was heading the Committee,
helped in inserting the crucial clause that future pension enhancements
should be automatically passed on to the past pensioners. As would be
seen, with this provision instead of being a one-time benefit, OROP
becomes a permanent feature for pension equation. It is a boon for
future pensioners. We also had a few meetings with an influential
Committee member Mr Ram Vila Paswan and succeeded in soliciting his
support.
The
cumulative effect of all these efforts resulted in OROP being announced
in the Parliament on 17 Feb 2014. Interaction with Mr AK Antony further
ensured that this clause - of future enhancements being given
automatically to past pensioners - was inserted in the Note he issued in
the fourth week of February 2014. This definition was also later
reiterated by the RRM in the Parliament in November 2014. Ever since
February 2014, OROP has been only a question of 'when' and not of
'whether' it would come through.
The
bureaucratic hurdles were indeed there. First they wanted 'service in
the rank' and not 'total service' as the criterion. This was adequately
explained to the RRM and he confirmed that he would overrule the
bureaucrats; he did. The second resistance was in the form of a
perceived administrative difficulty in implementing the frequent
enhancement in pensions. This was again explained to the RRM that
pensions could be enhanced once a year and that since the Dearness
Allowance was already being enhanced twice a year in the case of all
pensioners without any difficulty any apprehension in case of pension is
unfounded.
The
proposal is being sent to the Finance Ministry. With the PM himself
having committed grant of OROP repeatedly, it is unlikely that the
Finance would even do any pruning of the proposal. After receipt back
from the Finance Ministry, tables would be prepared jointly by the MoD
and Service HQ. Some of the broad parameters of OROP are as under:
1. The definition, as given by the Koshyari Committee stays unchanged.
2. The
existing 'X' and 'Y' Groups would continue. The Service Headquarters
had wanted merging of the Groups to 'X' level but the recommendation
was not accepted.
3. The
equation will be with the maximum pensions of past pensioners as
explained in my article attached with the Sitrep dated 20 Jan 2015.
Extract is given below:
"Keeping
the above parameters in mind, a model is suggested here. Let us take
the rank of Havildar. The base date of implementing OROP being 1 April
2014, take a sample of the total number of Havildars that retired in the
preceding few months or an year. Take the highest pension earned by any
Havildar during this period and use that as a benchmark for fixing
pension of all Havildars. Since they all retire after a total service of
24 years, the application is simple. In the case of officers, since
they retire by age, and the total service varies, take the maximum
earned in the chosen sample for different lengths of total service and
use these as benchmarks in a similar manner."
4. At the time of preparing tables, Majors' pension is proposed to be upgraded to Lt Col less the Grade Pay equivalent.
5. The total estimated annual cost of OROP is Rs 8,200 Crore.
There
are several anxious and even impatient calls being received daily
where ESM keep asking for the progress on OROP. The Defence Minister in
his TV interview had stated that OROP would be implemented by 31 March
2015. There is no change to that timeline. Some queries even pertain to
the budget allocation, which should not be our worry/concern at all. A
patient wait is required.
Best regards,
Lt Gen Raj Kadyan
Chairman IESM
262, Sector - 17A
Gurgaon - 122 001
For officers, there is no group. An officer with expertise of flying or advanced technology gets equal pension as like as a logistic officer. If so, retention of groups of pbors like 'x' and 'y' does not have any merit and against the spirit of one rank one pension as recommended by Keshiari Committee and verdict of Hon'ble Supreme Court. Implementation of group amongst Pbor may invite legal complication in the long run.
ReplyDeleteAll the ESM waiting to see budget allocation for OROP.
ReplyDelete