VARIOUS 6CPC & RELATED CIRCULARS PERTAINING TO PENSION BENEFITS OF  EX-SERVICEMEN INCLUDING COMMISSIONED OFFICERS ISSUED BY PCDA-LINK
click open link to view

6th CPC – Revision of provisions for pensionary awards relating to disability pension/war injury pension/special family pension/liberalized family pension/2nd Life Award of family pension (Special family pension/Liberalised Family Pension)/Special Pension

Circular No. 411

22.05.2009

LPC Cum data sheet for corrigendum family pensionary award for Armed FOrces Personnel below Oficer Rank (PBOR) - reg.

Circular No. 414

07.07.2009

LPC Cum data sheet for corrigendum family pensionary award for Armed FOrces Personnel below Oficer Rank (PBOR) - reg.

Circular No. 414

07.07.2009

Ordinary Family Pension award in respect of PBOR who died/discharged on or after 01.01.2006

406

31.03.2009

SOP for revision of pension consequent on implementation of recommendation of VI CPC in respect of Pensioners who retired on or after 1.1.2006

SOP

18.02.2009

Detailed instructions on Revision of pension consequent on implementation of recommendation of VI CPC in respect of Personnel below Officer Rank (PBOR) who retired on or after 1.1.2006

No. 17(4)/2008(2)/D (Pen/Policy)

12.11.2008

CORRIGENDUM to instructions on Revision of pension as per 6 CPC in r/o Personnel below Officer Rank (PBOR) who retired on or after 1.1.2006

17(4)/2008(2)/D (Pen/Policy)

27.11.2008

CIRCULAR 400 Implementation of Govt. decision on recommendation of the Sixth Central Pay Commission regarding pensionary benefits for Armed Forces Personnel below Officer Rank (PBOR) retiring or dying in harness on or after 01.01.2006

Circular No. 400

05.12.2008

Sixth CPC - Pension for Armed FOrces Personnel below Oficer Rank (PBOR) retiring or dying in harness on or after 01.01.2006 - Option for commutation of pension- reg.

Circular No. 418

15.09.2009

Sixth CPC - Implementaiton - Pension for Armed FOrces Personnel below Oficer Rank (PBOR) retiring or dying in harness on or after 01.01.2006 - reg.

Circular No. 421

03.11.2009

Payment of fixed medical allowance to defence pensioners living non CGHS areas

circular 451

21.02.2011

Payment of commuted pension to post 2006 retirees died without excercising option

Circular 466

20.07.2011

6CPC-Review of pension for officers retired/died in harness after 01.01.2006

Section Order 06

29.08.2011

Revision of provision for payment of gratuity for officers retired/invalidated/died after 1.1.2006 Improvement in the pension to bridge the gap in pension of Pre 01.01.2006 and Post 01.01.2006 discharged Personnel Below Officer Rank (PBOR) of Armed Forces. Implementation of the Government decision on the recommendations of the Sixth Central Pay Commission - Pension of Personal Below Officer Rank( PBOR) discharged from service on or after 1.1.2006.

Section Order No.6 Circular No. 430  Circular No. 471

29.08.2011

SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2012
INVITATION VETERANS RALLY AT JANTAR MANTAR.NEW DELHI...01 DEC 2012

INVITATION
DEFENCE VETERANS WILL CONTINUE COUNTRYWIDE MOVEMENT AGAINST GOVERNMENT APATHY VISHAL EX SERVICEMEN RALLY AT JANTAR MANTAR, NEW DELHI ON 01 DEC 2012- 10 AM

Dear Members of the Media,
1.       Peeved by continued apathy of the Government towards their genuine demands, the Defence Veterans plan to continue their protests across the country.  As part of it, an Ex Servicemen Rally will be held at Jantar Mantar, New Delhi on 01 Dec 2012 from 10 AM to 3 PM.
2.       One Rank One Pension (OROP) is a four decades old demand of Defence Veterans. It implies “Defence Personnel with the same rank and same length of service must draw the same pension irrespective of the date of retirement”.  However despite most political parties declaring support for it, and despite many Committees on Defence recommending implementation of OROP for Defence Veterans, the Government has not implemented it.
3.       Unfortunately this is not an isolated case of neglect of Defence veterans’ interests. Many Governmental actions relating to Veteran affairs indicate an institutional indifference and perhaps willful design that is both alarming and demotivating. Consider the following:
a.       The ridiculous situation wherein a Major General draws a pension lower than that of a Lieutenant Colonel- three ranks lower in the hierarchy.
b.      A Havildar drawing a pension less than that of a Sepoy, which is a much junior rank?
c.       A Lieutenant General drawing almost the same pension as a Colonel or a Brigadier, ranks that are junior.
d.      While all Central Govt employees have been given three Assured Career Progressions by the 6th CPC, the same has been denied to the “Sepoy” who is compulsorily retired after 15 – 17 years of service and the Assured Career progression to Defence persons are authorized after 8, 16, 24 years of service.  Is it not Gross injustice that a Sepoy is not granted the financial benefit of 3rd Career Progression before retirement to enable him to get the pension accordingly?  
e.      Non-inclusion of Defence Services in even benefits like Non Functional Upgrades, made applicable to all other Government services EXCEPT Defence Services.
f.        Widows of Defence personnel are invariably left out of accretions in Pensions announced for JCO/OR.
g.       An amazing 39 serious anomalies have arisen in the implementation of even the 6th Central Pay Commission, causing grave injustice to the Defence Personnel in their status and thus inter-se equation with other Central Services, pay and pensions.
h.      Non implementation of the ‘Rank Pay’ awarded holistically by the Fourth Pay Commission, despite a recent court order.
i.         Periodically falsely claiming grants and benefits to Defence Veterans, without them being granted.
j.        Contesting all judicial orders / rulings favoring Defence Veterans.
k.       Non-inclusion of Uniformed fraternity even in committees set up over matters directly affecting them.
4.       It appears that our Government does not respect the sacrifices made by a soldier-who does not think twice before making the supreme sacrifice. This is a very unfortunate state of affairs.
5.       As you are aware, Defence Veterans have been depositing their medals with the President to protest the Government’s apathy towards them. 22000 medals have already been thus deposited. Following the Rally on 1 December, the next tranche’ of approximately ten thousand medals will first be taken around to various locations in NCR before being taken to Rashtrapati Bhawan, to make our countrymen aware of the injustice meted out to Defence Veterans.
6.       IESM has great pleasure in inviting you to please attend the rally on 1 Dec 2012 from 10 AM on, and experience firsthand, the angst of the Defence Veterans community.
Jai Hind!!
With Warm Regards,                                                      
 Yours Sincerely,
Maj Gen (Retd) Satbir Singh, SM                                                                    
Vice Chairman Indian Ex Servicemen Movement
 Mobile: 9312404269, 0124-411057                                                
Email:satbirsm@yahoo.com, satbirsm@gmail.com

THE CHAIRMAN  IESM MEETS  DEFENCE MINISTER

The chairman IESM had an opportunity to meet the defence minister on 12/11/2012. .

. OROP Vs Sanction of Rs 2300 Cr for Pension Enhancement. . During the discussion the defence minister confirmed that he has already cleared the file and the case is in progress with the DOPT and efforts are being made to clear it soon.  

Issue small, fallout fearsome!

 military veteran laments the government’s apathy towards the Indian armed forces with respect to pension and the lack of leadership could turn out to be disastrous

The issue of ‘One Rank One Pension’ (OROP), for the military services, has been heating up for a long time. More recently, India has seen its 2.3 million ex-servicemen—the most disciplined and law-abiding class in our society—having to publicly protest and return their medals, with petitions signed in blood, to draw government’s attention. Unlike their Indian Administrative Services (IAS) and other civil services brethren, military servicessoldiers do not have ‘Associations’ to hold rallies and demonstrations to express their grievances. Ex-servicemen (or ex-military services personnel) are, therefore, neither used to nor temperamentally inclined to make public their woes—a virtue the nation must respect. Yet, if an increasing number of them are now resorting to such methods, it must become a cause of concern for the government.

The arguments citing burden on the national exchequer and risk of triggering similar demands from other central civil services are unfair and unjust because there is no similarity in the job profiles of civil and military services. The rationale behind such rival claims would, therefore, be grossly faulty and scantily-clad mischief aimed at perpetuating the ongoing neglect and systematic suppression of the military and its retiring/retired soldiers. There are ground realities that further reinforce the genuineness and urgency of not only the grant of OROP to the ex-servicemen but also the importance of restoring the lost dignity, morale and well being of the nation’s muscle power—Indian Armed Forces:

1. Significance of Military ‘Rank’: The hierarchy of military leadership is based upon visible badges of rank and embellishments on the uniform worn by officers and JCOs/NCOs (Junior Commissioned Officers/Non-Commissioned Officers). All professional and social protocol of inter-action is governed by the status and authority carried by respective rank, in the hierarchical order. Legally and traditionally, the Armed Forces personnel carry their rank even on retirement, as a legacy, whereas in the active military service no junior can get more salary than his senior in the same rank. This equation is, ironically turned upside down, as we have juniors retiring later getting more pension than their seniors who retired earlier in the same rank. It is ridiculously embarrassing besides being unjust in every respect.
    
2. Serving and Retiring at a Loss: The majority of jawans and officers retire 10 to 20 years earlier than their civilian brethren, thereby losing service benefits, pay and allowances of higher ranks for those many years. The necessity to maintain a youthful military profile leads to jawans and JCOs retiring when they are still in the age group of 38 to 48 years and officers at 50, with their kids still too young and parents too old, with expanded family responsibilities. Civilians, on the other hand, get to serve up to 60 years and retire happily after reaching their final pay bands, with their children well settled and life’s basic commitments largely accomplished. These harsh terms and conditions of service results in heavy financial loss at the most crucial stage of a soldier—when he needs financial security most. Since almost all civil government employees reach their final post/pay band, they naturally retire having earned highest pension scale in their stream, which virtually translates to a more remunerative deal than the OROP demanded by ex-servicemen!

Accordingly, if military personnel chose to invoke the “principle of equity”, they should rightfully be demanding the highest pension grades in the corresponding running pay band of sub-major in respect of JCOs/OR (other rank) and the final scale of Senior Administrative Grade (SAG)/Higher Administrative Grade (HAG) (Major General/Lt General) in respect of officers since similar dispensation is in vogue for civil services.

3. Unequal Career Growth Options: Whereas nearly all civilians make speedy career advances, in secure environs of their pre-specified state cadres/deputations and reach their highest rank/pay bands, the majority in the Armed Forces (jawansand officers) find themselves out of job even though they fulfil the laid down criteria for career advancement/promotions.  A look at this career contrast: While over 90% of the IAS officers reach secretary/additional secretary level and none retires below joint secretary rank, only 0.02% of the Armed Forces officers make it to Army Commander level, 0.15% to other Lt General levels (Corps Commanders and others) and only 0.4% to Major General level (even after the recent cadre enhancement!). Because of the constricted pyramidal organisational structure of the Forces, a large number of competent officers fully eligible for higher ranks have to be wasted out every year. Caught in a whirlpool of systemic adversity, large numbers of qualified officers get neither their deserved pay nor pension.  Likewise, the majority amongjawans too reach no further than Honorary Havildar level, whereas almost all lower division clerks (LDC) in central services and all constables are assured to retire at least as Section Officers and sub-inspectors respectively reaping highest returns until and after 60 years of age. Military personnel obviously deserve to be appropriately compensated for the losses they are suffering due to early retirement and short-changed dispensation due to restricted career opportunities, early loss of job and resultant loss of salary and pension.
    
4. ‘Unique’ Service Conditions: Forfeiting their fundamental rights our jawans and officers not only serve in extremely hostile terrain and climate but also spend the better part of their lives separated from their families with no guarantee of even weekly holidays and festivals. From fighting at the world’s highest battlefield where hostile terrain and weather claim more lives than from enemy fire, to operating in jungles and deserts far away from the comforts of civilisation, soldiers lead an unusually tough life which is unseen and unimagined in normal civil life. These extraordinary service conditions make the Armed Forces uniquely distinct and incomparable with any other Service in the country. Recognising this uniqueness of the Defence Services, the government has already decided to have a separate pay commission for the Armed Forces in the future (as announced in the Lok Sabha by the defence minister on 13 July 2009). The crucial details as to how such a pay commission would be constituted and how equal to or independent of the other the central civil services pay commission it would be have not yet been made public.

5. Nation’s Last Resort: In spite of the back-breaking economic recession, it is primarily because of its superior military might that the United States is in a position to assert its will and authority, coercively, over any country in the world, disregarding dissent, if any, from any power in the world. It is through a credible military deterrent that a nation’s diplomatic and political strides find meaning and gives the economy its protective cover. Few countries have used their military might more than India to defend borders and maintain order. With a history of four wars since Independence, incessant insurgencies and expanding terrorism, India should be imparting lessons to the world on the importance of maintaining a powerful and motivated military. The government and the people alike have always turned to Fauj (Armed Forces) for speedy solutions—from Siachin to Arunachal to Kanyakumari, for anything too serious or too dangerous i.e. natural calamities, epidemic, riots, disruption of essential services, failure of civil administration and even for salvaging the national honour in fiascos like the CWG footbridge collapse. Others raise their hands, stand aside and watch. But has the Fauj ever belied nation’s faith in its Armed Forces? Their failure, God forbid, if ever so it were, would be a national disaster.

The treatment being meted out to the Armed Forces in India has hurt serving and retired soldiers alike. A calculated and systematic method is seen clearly at work in degrading the position and prestige of military ever since the Fourth Pay Commission.  Every successive pay commission has pushed Armed Forces a few notches below their deserved niche. The way the Ex-servicemen’s demand for OROP proves that there are anti-military forces aggressively at work to deprive soldiers and ex-soldiers of their genuine dues. In all fairness, bureaucrats found guilty of delaying and denying military dues and entitlements must be severely dealt with and even prosecuted for their inefficiency and anti-national outlook. This must be particularly ensured in cases where the political leadership and/or the higher judiciary have ruled in favour of the military. The case in point is the ex-servicemen’s demand for OROP, which has been long lost in bureaucratic machinations despite its non-controversial character and unanimous support from all parties that have ever deliberated over this demand. It is clear from the following facts on record:

1. Grant of OROP has been repeatedly recommended by successive Parliamentary Committees over the years.

2. Nearly all major political parties, including Congress and the BJP, have supported the long pending OROP demand in their election manifestoes. The UPA chairperson, Sonia Gandhi has, on record, declared her support in favour of ex-servicemen on this score in her public utterances and media interactions.

3. Observations and directions passed by the judiciary (including the honourable Supreme Court) in a number of cases relating to disparity in pay & pension of ex-servicemen have favoured removal of disparity on this issue. An anguished Supreme Court has gone to the extent of admonishing the authorities for treating soldiers/ex-soldiers like ‘beggars’.

4. The committee headed by the cabinet secretary found it hard to refute the legitimacy of OROP demand. However, while the committee largely accepted the essence of the demand in respect of the JCOs/OR or Personnel Below Officer Rank (PBOR), in the case of Commissioned Officers, it stopped just short of according parity between pre and post 01-01-2006 pensioners. (Statement of AK Antony, minister of defence in the Lok Sabha on 13 Jul 2009). Confounding the simple issue, the committee’s convoluted recommendations, at best, halved the injustice to officers by introducing an absurdly misleading idea “modified parity” as if there could be such a thing as “modified truth” or “starve & enjoy”!

Unfortunately, a skewed impression has been created about the genuine requirements of the serving and retired soldiers as if these were nothing more than their welfare demands.  The seriousness of repercussions of such distorted views, in weakening the vitals of our national defence, is indeed grave because the nation’s defence potency will be only as strong as the motivation of its soldiers. Their well-being must, therefore, be viewed as national imperatives and not merely questions of their welfare. Since every serving soldier is a future ex-serviceman, repercussions of decisions on issues like OROP directly affect the psyche of fighting soldiers as well. The simmering disgruntlement among the soldiers and ex-soldiers raises serious questions on the state of morale and motivation of our Armed Forces. Nothing can be more perilous for a country than an impoverished leadership in the wake of continuing government apathy towards a demoralised military on basic issues such as OROP.

(The author is a military veteran and author of two international bestseller books on Leadership Development.)

curtsy-following link

ccuurts-following link

http://www.moneylife.in/article/issue-small-fallout-fearsome/28785.html

   EX-SERVICEMEN STATUS FOR
  RETIRED PARAMILITARY 
  PERSONNEL: The Hindu
The Union Cabinet  approved a proposal to give ex-servicemen status to retired personnel of paramilitary and central police forces, thus making them eligible for welfare benefits being availed by retired defence personnel, according to Union Home Minister Sushil Kumar Shinde.

“The granting of ex-servicemen status  was a longstanding demand of retired paramilitary personnel. These personnel as per the scheme will be called as ‘ex-central police personnel’ on the same footing as ‘ex-servicemen’ in the defense forces.Paramilitary personnel, like defense forces,have put their life at stake  in the course of duty and there is no problem in granting them this honor,” Mr. Shinde said while addressing the 73rd anniversary celebrations of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) and at a Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) event.

The new status would benefit over four lakh retired paramilitary and central police forces personnel. They can now avail certain subsidized medical and canteen facilities.‘Ex-central police personnel’ from paramilitary forces such as the CRPF, CISF, BSF, ITBP and SSB eligible will also be able to apply for jobs in the private sector that recognize ‘ex-servicemen’ as a trained and suitable talent for their organisations.

http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/exservicemen-status-for-retired-paramilitary-personnel/article4056610.ece

BASIS OF CALCULATION OF ENHANCED PENSION WITH 2 MORE YEARS OF WEIGHTAGE

THE MUCH AWAITED ENHANCED PENSION INSTEAD OF OROP IS LIKELY TO BE  CALCULATED ON THE BASIS OF NOTIONAL PAY AS APPLICABLE TO VARIOUS RANKS IN GROUPS ACROSS THE THREE SERVICES.IT MEANS THE ACTUAL SERVIVE  ADDED BY WEIGHTAGE GIVEN TO VARIOUS RANKS INCLUDING THE TWO YEARS GIVEN NOW SHOULD BE APPLIED TO  50% OF THE NOTIONAL PAY(OROP) APPLICABLE TO RANKS IN GROUPS OF THE SERVICES.THUS IT SHOULD BE CLEAR THAT OROP IS 50 % OF THE NOTIONAL PAY AS APPLICABLE TO VARRIOUS RANKS IN GRUOPS ACROSS THE THREE SERVICES GIVEN IN CIRCULAR 471 ANNEXTURE-A. IT IS CALCULATED  AS SHOWN BELOW.

*NP  X  WEIGHTAGE( AS SHOWN BELOW)

                  33

LATEST WEIGHTAGE FOR RANKS( EQUVALANT RANKS OF ARMY, NAVY, AIRFORCE)

SEPOY           = 12 YEARS + ACTUAL SERVICE

NAIK             = 10 YEARS + ACTUAL SERVICE
HAVILDAR   = 08 YERAS + ACTUAL SERVICE

* (NP)THE NOTIONAL PAY IS GIVEN IN PCDA CIRCULAR NO. 471 ANNEXURE - A

                   

CLICK THE FOLLOWING LINK TO VIEW THE ANNEXURE-A IN CIRCULAR 471  

http://www.pcdapension.nic.in/6cpc/Circular-471.pdf

HENCE IT IS VERY CLEAR THAT THE INTENTION OF THE GOVERNMENT IS TO

 EQUATE PENSION ACROSS  THE  RANKS IN GROUPS OF THREE SERVICES INSTEAD OF OROP. THIS IS A WELCOME STEP BUT THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED AFTER GRANTING OROP. IN OTHER WORDS OROP MEANS 50% OF THE NOTIONAL PAY, WHICH IS A GENUINE DEMAND OF VETERANS .OROP IS IN  BETWEEN THE 50% OF THE MINIMUM & MAXIMUM OF THE NOTIONAL PAY AS PER LENGTH OF SERVICE.  HENCE WE ARE STILL FAR AWAY FORM OROP.

.

LET US CARRY THE STRUGGLE FORWARD TILL WE ATTAIN SUCCESS

                                           JAI BHARATH MATHA KI 

LETTER WRITTEN BY MR. RAJEEV CHANDRASEKAR MP TO PRIME MINISTER FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF OROP IN LETTER & SPIRIT

DOUBLE CLICK THE FOLLOWING LINK TO SEE THE LETTER

http://www.rajeev.in/NewsRoom/rajeev_writes/OROP/Oct082012.pdf