FLASH

WATCH THIS BLOG REGULARLY FOR LATEST NEWS ON ONE RANK ONE PENSION & OTHER SERVICE BENEFITS RELATING TO EX-SERVICE PENSIONERS,CENTRAL GOVT PENSIONERS,LIC/GIC PENSIONERS* A UNIQUE BLOG WITH MORE THAN 1 CRORE VIEWERS & 700 FOLLOWERS #

FLASH

FlashFLASH**** UNION CABINET APPROVED OROP-3 REVISION FROM 01/07/2024 & CIRCULAR IS LIKELY TO BE ISSUED SOON **** New ***** *UNION CABINET APPROVED OROP REVISION FROM 01/07/2024 & CIRCULAR IS LIKELY TO BE ISSUED SOON
  • New











    .
  • Tuesday, 30 October 2012

    BASIS OF CALCULATION OF ENHANCED PENSION WITH 2 MORE YEARS OF WEIGHTAGE

    THE MUCH AWAITED ENHANCED PENSION INSTEAD OF OROP IS LIKELY TO BE  CALCULATED ON THE BASIS OF NOTIONAL PAY AS APPLICABLE TO VARIOUS RANKS IN GROUPS ACROSS THE THREE SERVICES.IT MEANS THE ACTUAL SERVIVE  ADDED BY WEIGHTAGE GIVEN TO VARIOUS RANKS INCLUDING THE TWO YEARS GIVEN NOW SHOULD BE APPLIED TO  50% OF THE NOTIONAL PAY(OROP) APPLICABLE TO RANKS IN GROUPS OF THE SERVICES.THUS IT SHOULD BE CLEAR THAT OROP IS 50 % OF THE NOTIONAL PAY AS APPLICABLE TO VARRIOUS RANKS IN GRUOPS ACROSS THE THREE SERVICES GIVEN IN CIRCULAR 471 ANNEXTURE-A. IT IS CALCULATED  AS SHOWN BELOW.


    *NP  X  WEIGHTAGE( AS SHOWN BELOW)
                      33

    LATEST WEIGHTAGE FOR RANKS( EQUVALANT RANKS OF ARMY, NAVY, AIRFORCE)

    SEPOY           = 12 YEARS + ACTUAL SERVICE

    NAIK             = 10 YEARS + ACTUAL SERVICE
    HAVILDAR   = 08 YERAS + ACTUAL SERVICE

    * (NP)THE NOTIONAL PAY IS GIVEN IN PCDA CIRCULAR NO. 471 ANNEXURE - A


                       
    CLICK THE FOLLOWING LINK TO VIEW THE ANNEXURE-A IN CIRCULAR 471  


    http://www.pcdapension.nic.in/6cpc/Circular-471.pdf


    HENCE IT IS VERY CLEAR THAT THE INTENTION OF THE GOVERNMENT IS TO
     EQUATE PENSION ACROSS  THE  RANKS IN GROUPS OF THREE SERVICES INSTEAD OF OROP. THIS IS A WELCOME STEP BUT THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED AFTER GRANTING OROP. IN OTHER WORDS OROP MEANS 50% OF THE NOTIONAL PAY, WHICH IS A GENUINE DEMAND OF VETERANS .OROP IS IN  BETWEEN THE 50% OF THE MINIMUM & MAXIMUM OF THE NOTIONAL PAY AS PER LENGTH OF SERVICE.  HENCE WE ARE STILL FAR AWAY FORM OROP.

    .

    LET US CARRY THE STRUGGLE FORWARD TILL WE ATTAIN SUCCESS

                                               JAI BHARATH MATHA KI 




    Thursday, 18 October 2012

    LIC SLP CLARIFICATION ORDER ISSUED


    17-10-2012 

                                                              ORDER OF THE COURT

    ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.4 SECTION XV
    S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
    IA No.3 In Petition(s) for
    Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).29956-29957/2011
    L.I.C. Petitioner(s)
    VERSUS
    KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA & ORS. ETC. Respondent(s)
    (With appln(s) for clarification and office report)
    Date: 17/10/2012 This I.A. was called on for hearing today.
    CORAM :
    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI
    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
    For Petitioner(s) Dr.A.M.Singhvi, Sr.Adv.
    Mr.Parag P.Tripathy, Sr.Adv.
    Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Adv.
    Mr.Surajit Bhaduri, Adv.
    For Respondent(s)/ Mr.Amarendra Sharan, Sr.Adv.
    Applicant Mr.R.K.Singh, Adv.
    Mr.Kumar Gaurav, Adv.
    Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv.
    Mr.Aakash D.Pratap, Adv.
    Ms.Vimla Sinha, Adv.
    Ms.Sushma Suri, A.O.R.
    UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
    O R D E R
    I.A.No.3 of 2012 In SLP(C) No.29957 of 2011
    This is an application by the respondent for clarification of order dated 14.11.2011.
    We have heard Shri Amarendra Sharan, learned senior counsel for the applicant and Dr.A.M.Singhvi, learned senior counsel for the SLP-petitioner and are satisfied that order dated 14.11.2011 needs to be clarified so that neither party may remain under a mistaken impression about the purport of this Court's order.
    In view of the above, paragraph 3 of order dated 14.11.2011 is substituted with the following:
    "In the meanwhile, the proceedings pending before the High Court under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 shall remain stayed subject to the condition that within eight weeks from today, the petitioner shall deposit in the Registry of the High Court the amount due to the pensioners i.e. the writ petitioners with effect from the date of their eligibiity to get retiral benefits."
    I.A. No.3 of 2012 is disposed of in the manner indicated above.
    As a sequel to disposal of I.A.No.3 of 2012, I.A.No.4 of 2012
    in I.A.No.3 of 2012 in SLP(C)No.29957 of 2011 is also disposed of.
    (Satish K.Yadav) (Phoolan Wati Arora)
    Court Master Court Master

    _________________________________________________________________
    THE CONTEMPT PETITION PENDING IN RAJ HC WAS LISTED  ON 25/10/2012.  DUE TO THE SC ORDER DATED 17/10/2012 IT HAS BEEN ADJOURNED TO JANUARY 2013 TO SEE AS TO WHAT AND WHEN LIC DEPOSITS THE MONEY AND ALSO WAITING DISPOSAL OF SLP IF POSSIBLE

    Thursday, 11 October 2012


    All missing Prisoners of War (POWs) are “on duty”


    Govt of India Implements 


    Landmark Orders of 

    Gujarat High Court in 

    PIL filed by the 
    Late Lt General Jagjit Singh Aurora

    It was on 23 December 2011 that the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court rendered a landmark judgement in a Writ Petition filed by the late Lt Gen Jagjit Singh Aurora and others in the year 1999.

    Besides other reliefs that were sought, the case was filed by the late General praying that the Govt may be directed to treat all missing Prisoners of War (POWs) as “on duty” for all intents and purposes till their date of retirement. It was also prayed that the Union of India be directed to take up the issue of the missing personnel with the International Human Rights Committee.

    The High Court, through a very detailed and extensive order, which at places recorded bone chilling details on the subject alongwith all related evidence on the matter, directed the Union of India to approach the International Court of Justice in this regard and also to pay all retirement and service benefits to the kin of the missing personnel as if they had retired on superannuation.

    The detailed judgement on the writ petition which was ordered to be treated as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), not only traced the entire length and breadth of the issue but also dealt with accounts of individual cases.

    The Ministry of Defence, though has challenged before the Supreme Court the part of the order which dealt with directions to the Govt to take up the case with the ICJ, has however implemented the other part which dealt with treating the missing personnel on duty and releasing benefits to the kin as if they (the missing personnel) remained on duty till their respective dates of retirement.

    The Defence Ministry has already forwarded the order for implementation to the Services HQ who in turn have asked the respective Record Offices to immediately take requisite steps.

    CLICK FOLLOWING LINK TO SEE JUDGEMENT

    __._,_.___

    Tuesday, 9 October 2012

    Expected DA from January, 2013

    Expectation of future Dearness Allowance from January, 2013 on the basis of 4 points jump 
    in CPI-IW for the month of July, 2012 and 2 points jump in August, 2012 giving expectation
     for DA  80% or more from January 2013.
    All India Consumer Price Index Number [http://labourbureau.nic.in/indtab.html] for Industrial
    Workers (CPI-IW) on base 2001=100 for July, 2012 showing increase in 2 points and stood at 
    214 (Two hundred & four).  If we expect only 1 point increase in this index for every month 
    the Dearness Allowance for Central Government Employee will touch 80% in January, 2013. 
     In view of increased LPG & Diesel price etc. we expect more monthly increase in Index and 
    similarly in future DA.  Please go through the following calculation:-

    Expected Dearness Allowance DA for Jan, 2013 calculated as under:

    Dearness Allowance = (Avg of AICPI for the past 12 months - 115.76)*100/115.76

    Month
    Base Year 2001 = 100
    Total of 12 Months
    Twelve monthly Average
    % increase over 115.76 for   DA
    DA announced or will be announced
    Dec-11
    197
    2298
    191.50
    65.43%
    65%
    Jan-12
    198
    2308
    192.33
    66.15%
    Feb-12
    199
    2322
    193.50
    67.16%
    72%
    Mar-12
    201
    2338
    194.83
    68.31%
    Apr-12
    205
    2357
    196.42
    69.68%
    May-12
    206
    2376
    198.00
    71.04%
    Jun-12
    208
    2395
    199.58
    72.41%
    Jul-12
    212
    2414
    201.17
    73.78%
    Aug-12
    214
    2434
    202.83
    75.22%
    80%
    Sep-12
    215
    2452
    204.33
    76.51%
    Oct-12
    216
    2470
    205.83
    77.81%
    Nov-12
    217
    2488
    207.33
    79.11%
    Dec-12
    218
    2509
    209.08
    80.62%
    Jan-13
    Expected DA from January 

    Implementation of the Government decision on the recommendations of the Sixth Central Pay Commission — Pension of Personnel Below Officer Rank (PBOR) discharged from service on or after 1.1.2006

    MONDAY, OCTOBER 8, 2012


    Implementation of the Government decision on the recommendations of the Sixth Central Pay Commission — Pension of Personnel Below Officer Rank (PBOR) discharged from service on or after 1.1.20





    The Chief of the Army Staff
    The Chief of the Naval Staff
    The Chief of the Air Staff

    Subject: Implementation of the Government decision on the recommendations
     of the Sixth Central Pay Commission — Pension of Personnel Below Officer 
    Rank (PBOR) discharged from service on or after 1.1.2006.






    Sir,

    This Ministry’s letter No. 17(4)/08(2)/D(Pen/Policy) dated 18.08.2010 is amended as follows :-
    Following may be inserted as Note below Para 3(v)-
    "Note — The provisions of this letter are not applicable to JCOs granted honorary
    Commission as Lieutenant and Captain. Service Pension for these ranks should
    continue to be determined in terms of Para 6.2 of this Ministry letter
    No. 17(4)/2008(2)/D(Pen/Policy) dated 12.11.2008."
    2.    All other entries remain unchanged

    3.    This issues with the concurrence of the Finance Division of this Ministry vide 
    their UO No. 31(1)2008/Fin/Pen, dated 12.09.2012.

    CLICK BELOW TO REFER THE FOLLOWING TWO ORIGINAL CIRCULAR


    Source/Original: http://cgda.nic.in/audit/mgp200912.pdf

    To see letter dated 18-08-2010 click here http://pcdapension.nic.in/6cpc/Circular-471.pdf 

    Sunday, 7 October 2012

    LIC's SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION IN SUPREME COURT.






    Wednesday, October 3, 2012

    LIC's SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION IN SUPREME COURT.

    Supreme Court of India

    You know it. Court proceedings are many-a-time a time consuming affair. 

    LIC's Special Leave Petition against the order of the Rajasthan High Court  was last listed in the cause list of the Supreme Court for 7th February this year. It was again listed for 5th October.

    Now we have the news that the Special Leave Petition is postponed to 26th November 2012.

    The result: Pretty well an year will be over with a couple of postponements.... and who knows, when our woes will be over once for ever.