FLASH

WATCH THIS BLOG REGULARLY FOR LATEST NEWS ON ONE RANK ONE PENSION & OTHER SERVICE BENEFITS RELATING TO EX-SERVICE PENSIONERS,CENTRAL GOVT PENSIONERS,LIC/GIC PENSIONERS* A UNIQUE BLOG WITH MORE THAN 1 CRORE VIEWERS & 700 FOLLOWERS #

FLASH

FlashFLASH**** UNION CABINET APPROVED OROP-3 REVISION FROM 01/07/2024 & CIRCULAR IS LIKELY TO BE ISSUED SOON **** New ***** *UNION CABINET APPROVED OROP REVISION FROM 01/07/2024 & CIRCULAR IS LIKELY TO BE ISSUED SOON
  • New











    .
  • Thursday, 18 October 2012

    LIC SLP CLARIFICATION ORDER ISSUED


    17-10-2012 

                                                              ORDER OF THE COURT

    ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.4 SECTION XV
    S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
    IA No.3 In Petition(s) for
    Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).29956-29957/2011
    L.I.C. Petitioner(s)
    VERSUS
    KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA & ORS. ETC. Respondent(s)
    (With appln(s) for clarification and office report)
    Date: 17/10/2012 This I.A. was called on for hearing today.
    CORAM :
    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI
    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
    For Petitioner(s) Dr.A.M.Singhvi, Sr.Adv.
    Mr.Parag P.Tripathy, Sr.Adv.
    Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Adv.
    Mr.Surajit Bhaduri, Adv.
    For Respondent(s)/ Mr.Amarendra Sharan, Sr.Adv.
    Applicant Mr.R.K.Singh, Adv.
    Mr.Kumar Gaurav, Adv.
    Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv.
    Mr.Aakash D.Pratap, Adv.
    Ms.Vimla Sinha, Adv.
    Ms.Sushma Suri, A.O.R.
    UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
    O R D E R
    I.A.No.3 of 2012 In SLP(C) No.29957 of 2011
    This is an application by the respondent for clarification of order dated 14.11.2011.
    We have heard Shri Amarendra Sharan, learned senior counsel for the applicant and Dr.A.M.Singhvi, learned senior counsel for the SLP-petitioner and are satisfied that order dated 14.11.2011 needs to be clarified so that neither party may remain under a mistaken impression about the purport of this Court's order.
    In view of the above, paragraph 3 of order dated 14.11.2011 is substituted with the following:
    "In the meanwhile, the proceedings pending before the High Court under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 shall remain stayed subject to the condition that within eight weeks from today, the petitioner shall deposit in the Registry of the High Court the amount due to the pensioners i.e. the writ petitioners with effect from the date of their eligibiity to get retiral benefits."
    I.A. No.3 of 2012 is disposed of in the manner indicated above.
    As a sequel to disposal of I.A.No.3 of 2012, I.A.No.4 of 2012
    in I.A.No.3 of 2012 in SLP(C)No.29957 of 2011 is also disposed of.
    (Satish K.Yadav) (Phoolan Wati Arora)
    Court Master Court Master

    _________________________________________________________________
    THE CONTEMPT PETITION PENDING IN RAJ HC WAS LISTED  ON 25/10/2012.  DUE TO THE SC ORDER DATED 17/10/2012 IT HAS BEEN ADJOURNED TO JANUARY 2013 TO SEE AS TO WHAT AND WHEN LIC DEPOSITS THE MONEY AND ALSO WAITING DISPOSAL OF SLP IF POSSIBLE

    1 comment:

    1. Dear Sir,
      Contempt petition before the Hon. CAT is for hearing tomorrow i.e. 25.9.2013 for not implementing the orders of Hon. PB CAT, Delhi in OA 0655/2010 followed by the Hon. Delhi High Court dismissing the appeal of UOI and the dismissal of SLP by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. Inspite of all this, Govt. has not cared to implement the judgments and adopted delay tactics. Can the Babus dare not to implement the decisions of the highest court of the country and argue not to implement the decision on the ground of financial implication , which is their own creation. Had they implemented the recommendation at the earlier stage such situation would not have arisen

      ReplyDelete