Dear Colleagues,
Accompanied by IESM Governing Body
members Hony Captains Nagendar Singh and Balwan Singh as well as Risaldar Om
Parkash I met the Raksha Mantri today. While I did highlight some other points,
OROP inevitably topped the agenda. The RM has all the details worked out,
including the expenditure involved in implementing OROP separately for
officers, JCOs/OR, families, disabled etc. He did mention the latest spanner
thrown in by a related Supreme Court decision (in the case of Maj Gen SPS Vains)
where the OROP has been mentioned. However, he appeared confident of resolving
the issue without much problem.
The RM is in full grip of the
situation. He exudes and inspires confidence. In a relatively short time he has
acquired good understanding of the complex manpower structure of the defence
forces. He is also fully supportive of the uniformed personnel.
Timeline for OROP? All clearances seems
to be in place. Work is progressing apace. My own estimate is OROP will come
latest by 26 May 2015, when the NDA
completes one year in office. I have given the farthest limit so that we do not
again fall prey to disappointment. Having said that I am hopeful it will come
much sooner than 26 May. Till then let us be patient.
Other
Points
Some other points that were mentioned
and handed over to the RM are:
1.
Reservists'
Pension. They are entitled to 2/3 of the minimum pension of a Sepoy
with 15 years' service, but not less than Rs 3,500/- per month. As of now they
are getting their entitlement. With OROP the minimum pension of a Sepoy will
rise, necessitating up-scaling of the Reservists' pension.Their
number is very small.
2.
Pension of
pre-2006 Hony Naib Subedars. As of today, Hony Naib
Subedars of post 1.1.2006 era are getting the pension of a regular Naib Subedar
but the pre- 2006 retirees are getting a Havildar's pension. Number of the
affected persons being small and finite, this anomaly needs to be removed.
3.
Pension of
Majors. It was highlighted that concept of OROP as well as
Supreme Court ruling speak against creating a dividing line for grant of
pension. Therefore, while considering grant of a Lt Colonel's pension to a pre
16.12.2004 Major, there should be no further dividing line based on 1.1.1996. Officers
that retired prior to 1.1.1996 in the rank of Major are only about 700 in
number and should not be subjected to any discrimination. The point was
registered.
4.
Minimising
Court Cases. It was highlighted that till the Third Pay Commission,
there were practically no court cases. Any pay commission anomaly that was
perceived was discussed and resolved between the Army Chief, Defence Secretary
and their assisting staff. That system needs to be revived.
In this connection I also highlighted
that when a military person seeks legal intervention, he is actually a
representative of a larger group. There should be a provision where the relief
provided to an individual should automatically extend to others similarly
affected. The RM clarified that legally, since it is not a PIL, the individual
fights for himself and the courts cannot give that benefit to others. However, an
administrative mechanism can be put in place for extending such benefit to
others. He further added that he is already having it examined for
implementation. This showed how
positively he is disposed toward resolving the soldiers' problems.
Best regards,
Lt Gen Raj Kadyan
Chairman IESM
262, Sector - 17A
Gurgaon - 122 001