Parrikar overlooks Services’ objections to implement pay panel recommendations ‘Grievances, if any, can be taken up later’

The Tribune

Ajay Banerjee

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, September 12

Three days after the armed forces rejected the salary and emoluments offered by the 7th Central Pay Commission (CPC), Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar on Monday told the forces that what has been decided by the government has to be implemented and grievances, if any, can be taken up later. It is now for the three Services — the Army, the Indian Air Force and the Navy — to decide on the matter, top sources said while revealing the day’s developments. The MoD has now “lobbed the ball” back at the forces even as some friction seems to be building between the forces and government.
IAF chief Air Chief Marshal Arup Raha and Navy chief Admiral Sunil Lanba today called upon Parrikar and explained that the existing pay commission’s notification done by the MoD on September 6 was inadequate and anomalies remain unresolved. The three Services, in separate letters to their formations, had conveyed that they have asked the government to hold “in abeyance” the implementation of the CPC in view of the “unresolved anomalies”.
 The Tribune had first reported on the matter on September 11. Sources in the MoD said Parrikar conveyed to the IAF and Navy chief that what all has been decided has to be implemented and “legitimate grievances” can be taken up latter. The government holds an opinion that all demands of all arms of the governments cannot be met in totality. The decision has to be implemented. The forces believe anomalies lower the status and pay parity of forces vis-à-vis their counterparts in the police and civilian administration. On September 9, the three forces issued separate letters — termed as a ‘signal’ in military parlance. This is to inform senior commanders and the troops about the decision of the top brass. 
The ‘signal’ said “a few concerns have been addressed we have been constrained to request the government to hold implementation of 7th CPC award in abeyance in view of anomalies which need to be resolved.” The Services Headquarters in the ‘signal’ sent down to the formations have asked serving personnel to display maturity and patience and not get swayed by hearsay or speculative reports. The Chiefs of Staff Committee (CoSC) which met on September 7 had taken the decision and the same has now been conveyed to the formations located all across the country, or sailing at high seas. 
The Chiefs of the three Services, who collectively command a strength of 1.7 million (17 lakh), are members on the CoSC. In March this year, the MoD had conveyed to an empowered committee headed by the Cabinet Secretary that the status, pay and allowances of the armed forces be kept above all other “fighting” arms of the government. Parrikar had also taken up the case that issues of status, pay and allowances for the forces have to be paramount.

7th pay panel: Captain hails defence chiefs

Chandigarh: Punjab Congress chief Capt Amarinder Singh on Sunday supported objections raised by the three services chiefs over the anomalies in pay scales of defence personnel in the 7th Pay Commission.
"There is blatant discrimination with defence services in pay scales, which is condemnable," he said in a statement. He hailed the stand taken by the three services chiefs. "Just because our soldiers are disciplined and dedicated to serving the nation, should not mean that they be discriminated against," he said. "We owe our peaceful lives to those guarding our borders and taking bullets for us. We must have gratitude towards them".
"Nobody among the bureaucrats knows about the hostile conditions in which our soldiers are made to work and that is the reason there is such a bias against the defence forces," he said, pointing out that according to the recommendations while a soldier posted at Siachen Glacier will get Rs 38,000 extra salary, while an IAS officer posted in Assam will get Rs 58,000 over and above his salary. "I have been seriously suggesting to the defence minister that the bureaucrats, who have habitually been creating hurdles and hindrances in providing better pay to the defence personnel, should be made to serve in Siachen for at least a day," he said, while asking the minister to stand by the soldiers and get the anomalies sorted.
Capt Amarinder said this was not only an issue of salary to the defence personnel but also their status vis-a-vis other civilian services, including the police and the administrative. He said that the defence services had constitutionally be put higher than the civil and police services.
"If the Seventh Pay Commission recommendations are accepted as such, what will happen in a situation like Kashmir where the Army is assigned the job as a last resort. Will it be asked to work under the local police and administration?" he said.
Capt Amarinder said, the issue was beyond the scope of the defence minister and the PM must intervene personally since it directly concerns the se

Armed forces reject pay panel : Resolve ‘anomalies’

 Sunday, September 11, 2016

  Ajay Banerjee

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, September 10

In an embarrassment to the Modi government, the armed forces have rejected the salary and emoluments recommended by the Seventh Central Pay Commission, pleading that its implementation be put on hold in view of the “unresolved anomalies” that lowered the status of the forces vis-à-vis their counterparts in the police and the civil administration.
The Ministry of Defence had issued the notification on September 6 after taking into account a letter by the three services chiefs on the issue of pay parity, among other things. This notification was exclusively for the forces. In the past 24 hours, the Army, the Navy and the Air Force have issued separate letters to inform senior commanders and the troops about the decision of the top brass. The Chiefs of Staff Committee had met on September 7 to discuss the issue.
 Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar is expected to take a decision on the matter on Monday.  Earlier, the notification for enhanced pay for the forces had been held up as the issues raised by the three services were being studied. The main “anomaly” is that the formula adopted for determining the basic pay for the armed forces is different from the one for other Central government employees. As a result, in each rank the service officers have been awarded lower pay scales. In March, the MoD had told an empowered panel that the status, pay and allowances of the armed forces be kept above the other “fighting” arms of the government.

CALLS FOR URGENT INTERVENTION BY PM TO SOLVE THE STALEMATE

Sunday, September 11, 2016

MILITARY UPS ANTE ON PAY ANOMALIES : WANT PAY REVISION HELD UNTIL ANOMALIES SOLVED - BY RAJAT PANDIT

New Delhi

The armed forces have upped the ante in their ongoing struggle for resolution of “core anomalies“ in their salary packages by asking the Centre to keep in “abeyance“ the implementation of the 7th Central Pay Commission (CPC) for them.

The Army , Navy and IAF headquarters have also issued signals to their 14 lakh personnel to hold their peace till they get the Centre to resolve the persisting anomalies.

Though couched in conciliatory terms, the signals are reflective of the widespread outrage in the military over how successive panels have degraded its status, parity and equivalence compared to civilian counterparts.

For instance, one of the signals issued on Friday -to personnel deployed in different operational commands, formations and units around the country -says: “In the interim, personnel are expected to display maturity and patience, and not be swayed by hearsay or speculative reports from any quarter.“

“The signals are meant to calm down restive personnel by telling them the Service HQs are raising with the government the pay anomalies that need to be resolved.

Otherwise, in these days of social media, personnel can easily fall prey to rumours,“ said an officer.

As was first reported by TOI last month, the three Service chiefs -Air Chief Marshal Arup Raha, General Dalbir Singh Suhag and Admiral Sunil Lanba -had also written to PM Narendra Modi in a last-ditch effort to get their concerns addressed.

The 33 lakh central government civilian employees have already begun to get their new enhanced salaries under the 7th CPC -along with arrears from January 1 -from this month onwards after their new pay-scales were earlier notified by the government.The notification for the armed forces, in turn, was issued on Tuesday .

But it merely deleted the controversial line that held additional levels were being added to the defence pay matrix to “maintain parity“ with the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs) like BSF , CRPF and the like.

“In effect, military officers, who were earlier equated with the IPS if not the IAS, have been reduced to the level of the paramilitary ,“ said another officer.

TOI last month, the three Service chiefs -Air Chief Marshal Arup Raha, General Dalbir Singh Suhag and Admiral Sunil Lanba -had also written to PM Narendra Modi in a last-ditch effort to get their concerns addressed.

The 33 lakh central government civilian employees have already begun to get their new enhanced salaries under the 7th CPC -along with arrears from January 1 -from this month onwards after their new pay-scales were earlier notified by the government.

The notification for the armed forces, in turn, was issued on Tuesday . But it merely deleted the controversial line that held additional levels were being added to the defence pay matrix to “maintain parity“ with the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs) like BSF , CRPF and the like.“In effect, military officers, who were earlier equated with the IPS if not the IAS, have been reduced to the level of the paramilitary ,“ said another officer.

One of the main anomalies raised earlier was the “artificial suppression of entry-level pay in each rank“ for the armed forces. Another issue is the denial of higher military service pay (MSP) for junior commissioned officers (JCOs).

SOURCE : TIMES OF INDIA, HYDERABAD

OROP: Stop the Circus, the Soldier Is Not a Fool

LT GENERAL P.C.KATOCH

Friday, September 09,2016

NEW DELHI: The former Justice LN Reddy Commission (henceforth refered as ‘RC’ – for Reddy Commission) looking into anomalies, post issue of the Central Government Notification of One Rank One Pension (OROP) on November 7, 2015, interacted with military veterans at Dehradun on September 6, 2016. It is not known whether the RC still is one man commission as announced in the beginning because Dehradun media mentioned serving military officers as part of the Commission – probably misreported?
As mentioned by the media, Reddy interacted with veterans at the Rashtriya India Military College where he informed the audience about his participation in the Char Dham yatra to four pilgrimage sites, and expressed his gratitude to Devbhoomi saying, “It is my personal feeling that the central government was to rethink on issues relating to the anomalies of OROP”.

 The pay and pension of Armed Forces personnel was governed by a separate Pay Commission and OROP was in vogue from 1947 to 1973, with the pension at 70% of the pay and automatic yearly actualization. According to the Koshiyari Committee, OROP implies uniform pension be paid to military veterans retiring in the same rank with the same length of service, irrespective of their date of retirement; any future enhancement in the rates of pension to be automatically passed on to the past pensioners; and bridging the gap between the pension of the current and past pensioners as also future enhancements of pension automatically granted to past pensioners. 

Even the naïve can interpret that this implies yearly actualization of pension, not every five years which the government announced – amounting to one rank different pensions. Not only was this definition accepted by two Parliaments, it was endorsed in writing by MoD on 26 February 2014. 

The Koshiyari Committee had veritably lambasted the government and bureaucracy, pointing out there was no reason for a 3rd CPC to take an ex-parte decision against OROP, that had been working satisfactorily for 26 years. The Committee also tore through explanations given by the Ministry of Defence, terming the treatment of military veteran’s as a clear case of “Bureaucratic Apathy”. 

Further, the Committee categorically ruled out equating civilian government employees with soldiering because: soldiers retire by rank, not age; terms and working conditions of the armed forces are tougher and harsher;the risk to the life of a soldier is always higher as they work under severe strain with undefined and unlimited working hours; transfers and dislocation along with bleak career prospects are other disadvantages faced by the armed forces; family life in the military is also non-comparable with that of civilian Government employees. 

With the Reddy Commission, attention was successfully diverted from the unaddressed anomalies of the 6th CPC and all preceding CPCs. The 7th CPC adroitly brought the military below the police force and post protests and representations, ‘equated’ the military with the police force which anyway was their intention in the first place. And why should it matter if the police now wears the same ranks, along with the same uniforms and accoutrements? Perhaps tomorrow the task of ‘external defence’ and ‘internal defence’ may become interchangeable. The fallout may be that while we don’t know whom to talk to in Pakistan, Pakistan too would be kept guessing whether they would be confronted by our police or our military. The Chinese may be so dumbfounded that they might withdraw from POK, Shaksgam and Aksai Chin. The dilemma would be for our youth whether they should opt for the olive green or the khakhi, with someone having refashioned the motivating slogan – “Do you have it in you? If you stay in Fauj, no promotion for you. If you continue, no NFU for you. If you leave and go, no OROP for you. Do you still have it in you?” 

But puns and fun apart, the government should seriously stop these sic politico-bureaucratic anti-soldier exercises. The soldier understands everything and he will not start stone-pelting to make you run around in circles. If you can’t fight “bureaucratic apathy” (as pointed out by the Koshiyari Committee) because of your own infirmities, stop wasting money on a circus like RC. If you do not want to give the soldier his due – just say so and he will accept it. This bit about no money ‘only in case of soldiers dues’ doesn’t gel with the din of skeletons vying to pop out of cupboards. 

India always had enough money that was grossly mis-utilized – and this is not just about a Rs 1 crore samosa party or Rs 14 crore spent on the spouse of a politico for medical treatment abroad. OROP has been deliberately portrayed as an officer-related issue, which it is not, affected officers being just 1%. The difficulty of visualizing how military values ‘izzat’ is well understood because no ward of a politician or bureaucrat joins the military but it should suffice to understand it cannot be haggled with as traders do for money. 

Finally, the Mathur-types who are not even authorized to mention ranks post retirement, they would do well to tread carefully when playing with the ‘izzat’ of the soldier and use only their mouths when speaking on the issue in public. (Lt General P.C.Katoch (retired) is a veteran officer of the Special Forces)

7th CPC IMPLEMENTATION RESOLUTION

(TO BE PUBLISHED IN PART-I SECTION 3 OF THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY)

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

MINISTRY OF DEFENCE

New Delhi, the 5^th September, 2016

RESOLUTION

No. 02 (E)      

No. 1(6)/2016/D (Pay/Services)

1.         The Seventh Central Pay Commission (CPC) was set up by the Government of India vide Ministry of Finance (Department of Expenditure) Resolution No.1/1/2013-E-III (A) dated 28^th February, 2014. The Commission submitted its report on 19^th November, 2015. The report covered among other things, matters relating to structure of emoluments, allowances, and conditions of service of Armed Forces personnel. Government has given careful consideration to the recommendations of the Commission relating to these matters in respect of Personnel Below Officer Rank (PBOR) of the Armed Forces and have decided that the recommendations of the Commission on the aforementioned matters in respect of these categories of Defence personnel shall be accepted as follows. Some of the major points in respect of Defence Personnel (PBOR) are as mentioned below: -           

(i)         Implementation of the revised pay structure will be w.e.f. 01.01.2016.

(ii)        Pay related Matter;

(a)        The existing system of Pay Band and Grade Pay has been replaced with separate Pay Matrices for both Defence and Military Nursing Services personnel.

(b)        Fixation of pay of each employee is the new Pay Matrix as on 01.01.2016 would be done by multiplying his/her basic pay by a factor of 2.57.

Note-1:            With regard to fixation of pay in the new Pay Matrix as on 01.01.2016, the existing pay (Pay in Pay Band plus Grade Pay) in the pre-revised structure as on 31.12.2015 shall be multiplied by a factor of 2.57. The figure so arrived at is to be located in the Level corresponding to employee’s Grade Pay in the new Pay Matrix. If a Cell identical with the figure so arrived at is available in the appropriate level, that Cell shall be the revised pay; otherwise the next higher cell in that Level shall be the revised pay of the employee.   

Note-2:            After fixation of pay in the appropriate Level as specified in Note-1 above, the subsequent increments shall be at the immediate next Cell in that Level.

(c)        General recommendations on pay recommended by the Commission have been accepted with the following exceptions in the Defence Pay Matrix, namely:

i.          The index of Rationalisation of Level 13 A (Brigadier) in Defence Pay Matrix may be revised upward from 2.57 to 2.67.   

ii.         Additional 3 stages in Level 12A (Lt Col), 3 stages in Level 13 (Colonel) and 2 stages in Level 13A (Brigadier) may be added appropriately in the Defence Pay Matrix.

(iii)       Increase in Military Service Pay (MSP) of Personnel Below Officer Rank (PBOR) from Rs 2000/- to Rs 5200/- p.m. MSP would be counted only for Dearness Allowance (DA) and Pension purposes;

(iv)       There would be two dates for grant of increments viz, 1^st January and 1^st July of every year, instead of existing date of 1^st July. However, an employ will be able to avail annual increment only on one of these two dates depending on the date of appointment, promotion, or grant of financial upgradation;

(v)        Recommendations on Allowances (except Dearness Allowance) would be referred to a Committee comprising Finance Secretary & Secretary (Expenditure) as Chairman and Secretaries of Home Affairs, Defence, Health & Family Welfare, Personnel and Training, Post and Chairman, Railway Board as Members. The Committee would submit its report within a period of 4 months. Till a final decision on Allowances is taken based on the recommendations of this Committee, all Allowances would continue to be paid as existing rates in existing pay structure, as if pay had not ben revised w.e.f 1.1.2016 i.e. status quo would be maintained;

(vi)       Arrears of Pay would be paid during the current financial year;

(vii)      Recommendations not relating to pay and allowances and other administrative issues specific to department/cadres/posts would be examined separately as per the Transaction of Business Rules/Allocation of Business Rules.

2.         Other instructions on Pay Fixation and increment not specifically covered in these instructions will be as in Government of India, Ministry of Finance (Department of Expenditure) Resolution No. 1-2/2016 – IC dated 25^th July, 2016. 

3.         The decisions taken by the Government accordingly on various recommendations of the Commission in respect of Personnel Below Officer Rank (PBOR) of Armed Forces are indicated in the statement at Annexure-I to this Resolution. New Pay Matrix for Personnel Below Officer Rank (PBOR) is at Annexure –II. 

Sd/-------------------------

(V Anandarajan)

Joint Secretary to the Government of India

ORDER

Ordered that the Resolution be Published in the Gazette of India Extraordinary.

Ordered also that a copy of the Resolution be communicated to: - 

1.         Army Headquarters.

2.         Naval Headquarters.  

3.         Air Force Headquarters.

4.         Pay Commission Cells of Army, Navy, and Air Force.

5.         Controller General of Defence Accounts and all CDAs.

Sd/-----------------

(V Anandarajan)

Joint Secretary to the Government of India

ANNEXURE-I

STATEMENT SHOWING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE VII CENTRAL PAY COMMISSION RELATED TO PERSONNEL BELOW OFFICER RANK (PBOR) OF THE ARMED FORCES AND GOVERNMENT DECISION THEREON (FIGURES REFERRED IN PARENTHESIS PERTAIN TO CHAPTER AND PARAGRAPH OF THE PAY COMMISSION REPORT)

Sl No	Recommendations of the VII CPC	Decision of the Government
1.	Fitment Factor: The Seventh CPC has recommended fitment in the pay band in the following manner: - “The fitment in the new pay matrix is essentially a multiple factor of 2.57. The multiple is the ratio of the new minimum pay arrived at by the Commission and the existing minimum pay. The fitment factor is being applied uniformly to all employees. It includes a factor of 2.25 to account for DA neutralisation, assuming that the rate of Dearness Allowance would be 125 percent at the time of implementation of the new pay as on 01.01.2016. The actual raise/fitment being recommended by the Commission is 14.29 percent. An identical fitment of 2.57 has also been applied to the existing rates of Military Service Pay (MSP) applicable to Defence forces personnel only.’ (Para 5.2.7)	Minimum Pay, Fitment Factor, Index of Rationalisation, Pay Matrices and general recommendations on pay recommended by the Commission in as much as it impacts PBORs accepted without any material alteration.
2	Rate of Increment: The rate of annual increment is being retained at 3 percent (Para 5.1.38)	There would be two dates for grant of increment viz. 1st January and 1st July of every year, instead of existing date of 1st July. However, an employee will be able to avail annual increment only on one of these two dates depending on the date of appointment, promotion, or grant of financial upgradation.
3	Military Service Pay for PBORs: The Defence forces personnel, in addition to their pay as per the Matrices above, will be entitled to payment of Military Service Pay for all ranks up to and inclusive of Brigadiers and their equivalents. The Commission recommends an MSP for Defence forces personnel at Rs 5,200 for JCOs/ORs. MSP will continue to be reckoned as Basic Pay for purposes of Dearness Allowance, as also in the computation of pension. Military Service Pay will however not be counted for purposes of House Rent  Allowance, Composite Transfer Grant and Annual Increment, (Para No. 5.2.22)	Rate of Military Service Pay (MSP) is accepted. However, MSP will be counted only for Dearness Allowance (DA) and Pension.
4	Group ‘X’ Pay: The Commission recommends: (a) X pay for JCOs/ORs in Group ‘X’ at Rs 6,200 per month: For all X trades which involve obtaining a qualification which is equivalent of a diploma recognised by AICTE. This amount is the difference in the minimum of the Pay level 6 (corresponding to Grade Pay of Rs 4200 in VI CPC),  and Pay Level 5 (corresponding to Grade Pay of Rs 2800 in VI CPC). (Para 6.2.88) (b) X Pay for JCOs/ORs in Group X at Rs 3, 600 per month: (standard fitment of 2.57 on the existing X pay of Rs 1,400) for those currently in X pay, but not having a technical qualification recognised by AICTE. (Para 6.2.88).	Accepted.
5.	Pay Scales of Honorary Commissioned Officers: The Commission, taking note of the existing framework of Honorary Commission recommends that the Junior Commissioned Officers on their promotion as Honorary Lieutenant or Honorary Captain shall be placed in the pay level 10 and pay level 10B respectively. They will, in addition be paid Military Service Pay of Rs 15, 500 per month on par with that payable to all the Commissioned officers. (Para 6.2.92).	Accepted.
6	Grant of Financial Upgradation under MACP to the DSC Personnel: Since Defence Security Corps personnel are personnel under the Army, they would also be permitted the benefit of MACP. However, this benefit should be limited to a total of three upgrades in the entire service career, both during regular employment and in the course of reemployment as Defence Security Corps personnel. As they are defence forces personnel the benefit of MACP would be extended to them after a period of eight years from their dat of reemployment, in case they do not get a promotion. (Para 6.2.98).	Accepted.
7	Pay Structure of Non-Combatant (Enrolled): The Commission recommends MSP for Non-Combatants (Enrolled) at the rate of 70 percent of combatants. Accordingly, the Commission recommends an enhancement of MSP for Non-Combatant (Enrolled) in the Air Force from the existing rate of Rs 1,000 per month to Rs 3,600 per month. (Para 6.2.100 & 6.2.101)	Accepted.

Pay Matrix (Defence Forces Personnel – except Military Nursing Service)

[Tables edited for compactness by Aerial View]

Pay Band	5200-20200			9300-34800					15600-39100
Grade Pay	2000	24000	2800	3400	4200	4600	4800	5400	5400	6100	6600
Level	3	4	5	5A	6	7	8	9	10	10B	11
1	21700	25500	29200	33300	35400	44900	47600	53100	56100	61300	69400
2	22400	26300	30100	34300	36500	46200	49000	54700	57800	63100	71500
3	23100	27100	31000	35300	37600	47600	50500	56300	59500	65000	73600
4	23800	27900	31900	36400	38700	49000	52000	58000	61300	67000	75800
5	24500	28700	32900	37500	39900	50500	53600	59700	63100	69000	78100
6	25200	29600	33900	38600	41100	52000	55200	61500	65000	71100	80400
7	26000	30500	34900	39800	42300	53600	56900	63300	67000	73200	82800
8	26800	31400	35900	41000	43600	55200	58600	65200	69000	75400	85300
9	27600	32300	37000	42200	44900	56900	60400	67200	71100	77700	87900
10	28400	33300	38100	43500	46200	58600	62200	69200	73100	80000	90500
11	29300	34300	39200	44800	47600	60400	64100	71300	75400	82400	93200
12	30200	35300	40400	46100	49000	61200	66000	73400	77700	84900	96000
13	31100	36400	41600	47500	50500	64100	68000	75600	80000	87400	98900
14	32000	37500	42800	48900	52000	66000	70000	77900	82400	90000	101900
15	33000	38600	44100	50400	53600	68000	72100	80200	84900	92700	105000
16	34000	39800	45400	51900	55200	70000	74300	82600	87400	95500	108200
17	35000	41000	46800	53500	56900	72100	76500	85100	90000	98400	111400
18	36100	42200	48200	55100	58600	74300	78800	87700	92700	101400	114700
19	37200	43500	49600	56800	60400	76500	81200	90300	95500	104400	118100
20	38300	44800	51100	58500	62200	78800	83600	93000	98400	107500	121600
21	39400	46100	52600	60300	64100	81200	86100	95800	101400	110700	125200
22	40600	47500	54200	62100	66000	83600	88700	98700	104400	114000	129000
23	41800	48900	55800	64000	68000	86100	91400	101700	107500	117400	132900
24	43100	50400	57500	65900	70000	88700	94100	104800	110700	120900	136900

Pay Matrix (Defence Forces Personnel) continued

Pay Band	37400-67000				67000-79000	75500-80000	80000	90000
Grade Pay	8000	8700	8900	10000
Level	12A	13	13A	14	15	16	17	18
1	116700	125700	139600	144200	182200	205400	225000	250000
2	120200	129500	143800	148500	187700	211600
3	123800	133400	148100	153000	193300	217900
4	127500	137400	152500	157600	199100	224100
5	131300	141500	157100	162300	205100
6	135200	145700	161800	167200	211300
7	139300	150100	166700	172200	217600
8	143500	154600	171700	177400	224100
9	147800	159200	176900	182700
10	152200	164000	182200	188200
11	156800	168900	187700	193800
12	161500	174000	193300	199600
13	166300	179200	199150	205600
14	171300	184600	205100	211800
15	176400	190100	211300	218200
16	181700	195800	217600
17	187200	201700
18	192800	207800
19	198600	214000
20	204600
21	210700
22
23
24