Ex-servicemen squat on rail tracks for 12 hours in Punjab's Patiala; train movement hit

 The movement of trains going towards Delhi, Jammu and Amritsar has been affected due to the protest, say officials.

A group of ex-servicemen squatted on railway tracks at Shambhu railway station when they were stopped from heading to Delhi for a protest over alleged anomalies in the ‘One Rank One Pension’ scheme, in Patiala, November 25, 2023

PTI

Patiala, November 25

A group of ex-servicemen squatted on railway tracks at the Shambhu railway station in this Punjab district for nearly 12 hours on Saturday when they were stopped from heading to Delhi for a protest over alleged anomalies in the “One Rank One Pension” (OROP) scheme, officials said.

The protest affected the train movement on the section, the Government Railway Police (GRP) officials said.

After being assured by officials from the district administration that the governor would meet them, the protesters lifted the dharna at about 4:30 pm, they added.

Some of the protesters had said earlier in the day that they were headed to Delhi on various modes of transport when they were stopped by police from entering Haryana via the Shambhu border.

A GRP official said the movement of trains going towards Delhi, Jammu and Amritsar was affected due to the protest.

“The dharna has been lifted and normal movement of trains restored,” he said.

Sources said around 250 ex-servicemen sat on the dharna at the railway station in the morning, but their number increased later on.

SABKA SANGARSH COMMITEE WHO SPEAR HEADS RAIL ROKO AGITATION MET GOVERNER OF PUNJAB TODAY ON THE ADVICE OF CHIEF MINISTER OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH

EX-SERVICEMEN IN PUNJAB SITS IN RAIL TRACK IN SUPPORT OF OROP ANOMALIES RECTIFICATION

A HIDDEN AND SHOCKING TRUTH REGARDING DEFENCE PENSION

Non-Compliance' With AFT Order On Pension - Punjab & Haryana HC Issues Contempt Notice To Sr. Defence Ministry Official

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued a notice for contempt against Alka Sharma, principal integrated financial adviser at the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and Major General Ashok Singh, the additional director general of personnel services.

The bench of Justice Arvind Singh Sangwan issued the notice Friday. The issue pertains to the matter of retirees of the rank of honorary naib subedars who were not paid interest on their pension arrears as directed by the
Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) in 2017.

After repeated non-compliance and non-appearance of the concerned officers, the Chandigarh bench of the AFT issued notice for contempt and arrest warrants against the officers. The MoD then approached the high court against the warrants and the contempt proceedings.

Recording the undertaking that the MoD would comply with the orders of AFT by August 30, 2023, a division bench had then directed that the warrants would be kept in abeyance in case the concerned officers filed an affidavit of compliance by personally appearing in the AFT on the date fixed.

Though the officers then appeared in the AFT, the compliance affidavit was not filed, and rather, on the application of one of the officers, Alka Sharma, the contempt case itself was later transferred from the Chandigarh bench to the principal bench in by the AFT chairperson.

The main petitioner, Honorary Naib Subedar Roop Lal, a senior citizen, approached the high court under contempt jurisdiction stating that the undertaking made before the division bench was flouted by the officers and that the contemnors by getting the case transferred to Delhi have succeeded to oust the jurisdiction of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which had passed orders for compliance.

It has also been stated that the high court orders had regrettably not been taken note of by the AFT chairperson while transferring the case and that the orders of a constitutional court (high court) have been circumvented by an administrative order by the chairperson of a statutory tribunal, that too, without notice to the affected party.

The contempt petition has been filed by AS Narang, Rajesh Sehgal and Bhim Sen Sehgal, advocates for the petitioner.

TECHNICAL AIR VETERANS WELFARE ASSOCIATION FILES WRIT PETION IN SUPREME COURT AGAINSR CUT OFF DATE FOR X GROUP PAY

Supreme Court stays Justice DC Chaudhary transfer to AFT Kolkata bench; seeks explanation from AFT Chairperson

The Supreme Court on Monday effectively stayed the transfer of Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) judicial member Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary from the principal bench at Chandigarh to the Kolkata bench of the tribunal.

A Bench of Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra also sought an explanation for the transfer from the AFT Chairperson. It said in its order,

"We direct that AFT Chairperson in a sealed cover informs the Supreme Court Registrar as to why the transfer was given effect to. Pending further orders Shri Chaudhary need not assume charge in Kolkata. The execution applications being heard in Chandigarh shall not be disposed of without leave of this court."

It went on to note,

"Ordinarily, this Court is circumspect in interfering with orders involving transfers. But here a judicial member of AFT has been transferred from Punjab to Kolkata. Bearing in mind the conventional wisdom by which the excercise of power of judicial review is subject to self imposed restraints it is needed to note the grievance of the Bar Association."

The Court was hearing a plea by the AFT Bar Association at Chandigarh seeking a stay on the transfer order issued by the AFT Chairperson. The Association had alleged that the transfer was a consequence of the strict orders passed by Justice Chaudhary against senior government officials of the Ministry of Defence (MoD).

The Bar Association has been on indefinite strike to protest the transfer of Justice Chaudhary, which it termed a "direct assault on the independence of the judiciary."

While transferring Justice Chaudhary, the Chairperson had also transferred to himself the contempt case filed against a Defence Accounts Department officer for failing to implement judgments of the Supreme Court, a case that was slated to be heard by Justice Chaudhary before his transfer.

After hearing arguments highlighting this chain of events, the Bench noted,

"Petitioner submits that transfer is mala fide and this needs to be appreciated at a correct stage. At this stage it appears that orders passed since December required Centre to comply. In these circumstances, the transfer would merit close scrutiny. The transfer of a judicial officer in the background where he was dealing with applications seeking compliance of orders for pension to Naib subedars."

The Bar Association also argued that the control of the Union Defence Ministry over the AFT is contrary to Constitution Bench judgments of the Supreme Court. The Court issued notice in the plea, and directed that the AFT Chairperson's report be submitted before the next date of hearing, on Friday, October 13.

The AFT Bar Association had penned a strongly-worded letter to the CJI on September 25, and decided to indefinitely abstain from work as a mark of protest against the transfer.

Thereafter, the AFT bar associations at Jammu and Lucknow also expressed solidarity with the AFT Chandigarh Bar Association in objecting to the transfer of Justice Chaudhary.

More bar associations have since joined in supporting the AFT Chandigarh Bar Association in its protest.

These associations include the district bar associations in Chandigarh, Panchkula and Kurukshetra, and the Veteran Air Warrior Association in Haryana.

The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) Bar Association is the latest association to join the protest against the transfer.

The Bar Assocation had written another letter to the CJI, alleging that Defence Minister of India Rajnath Singh openly admitted to interfering in the transfer of Justice Chaudhary.

The letter claims that during an event conducted by the Defence Accounts Department on October 1, the Minister openly acknowledged the Ministry's involvement in the transfer just before a contempt case was to be heard.

The letter also referred to the Minister urging members and the Chairperson of the AFT a few days earlier to slow down case disposal, stating that "justice hurried is justice denied."