FLASH
FLASH
Monday, 6 March 2023
FURTHER PROOF OF NASTY GAME PLAN OF DEPARMENT OF EX-SERVICEMEN FAREWEL
THE NASTY GAME PLAYED BY DEPARTMENT EX-SERVICEMEN FAREWEL
Tuesday, 21 February 2023
LIVE VIDEOS FROM JANTAR MANTAR
Saturday, 18 February 2023
AN UNFORGIVABLE INJUSTICE TO VETERANS BY DESW WITH A HIDDEN AGENDA
Same Method was followed by 7th
CPC too.
The X Group Pay of 1400 was
revised to 6200 being the difference between the entry-level Pay of
level 5 (29200) & level 6
(35400).
The Air HQ Had notified all the existing technical trades drawing an X gp Pay Rs 1400 as eligible for XGP Pay of Rs. 6200.
Air HQ is the competent authority which decides about the competency of its trades & its equivalency as per eligibility criteria mentioned in cabinet resolution dated 05/09/2016 with respect to Airforce trades. The Air HQ has considered the lower X GP Pay of Rs.3600 as mentioned in the above cabinet resolution only for one of its Non-Technical trade Namely Garuda & all other Technical trades were equalised with in the eligibility norms as mentioned in the cabinet resolution vide Para 1 of Air HQ Circular AirHQ/99141/1/AFPCC dated 8th May 2017. In compliance of this letter Air force Record office revised the X GP pay of all its existing technical trades to Rs. 6200 by issuing new PPO showing this revision & arrears were paid w.e.f. 01/01/2016 aspercircular No.17(01)/2017/(02)ID(Pension/Policy) dated 05/09/2017.
Now how this can be denied to Pre-2016 Air force technical veterans who are already drawing the same from 01/01/2016 as per their PPO by the issue of table 7 of circular666. This is a clear violation of the modalities mentioned in Para 3 of HSC approved OROP notification dated 07/11/215 & the principles laid down by the HSC in Para 49 (i) & (ii) of the Judgement in WP( C ) 419/2016.
The DESW is now feeling the heat &started showing new reason for the denial of X GP Pay to pre 2016 veterans on the ground that the revised Amount opf Rs.6200 is a new benefit from. 01/01/2016.
This shows that silently are
accepting the fact that there was a violation of HSC laid down principles
contained in Para 48 (ii) of Judgement in WP(C) 419/2016.
There is no takers for their another cntension that Notional fixation of pay in 7th CPC which is main nerve of it & OROP are two different things can not be mixed, this principle also applicable to desw that they also can not mix bifurcation of X gp in 7th CPC & OROP revision since both are different things.
Friday, 17 February 2023
PCDA SPEAKING ORDER FOR SPARSH PROBLEMS
Wednesday, 15 February 2023
MOD TRYING TO UDERMINE THE DIRECTION OF HSC IN OROP REVISION
The Argument
put forward by the Policy making body of the Mod is not backed by any document
either approved by the executive or contained in the in the cabinet approved
resolution of 7th CPC dated 05/09/2016. The Air Head Quarters has
issued the list of all existing technical trades with eligibility for X GP pay
of Rs 6200 & a new Non tech X gp trade with eligibility for Rs. 3600 as X gp
Pay on the implementation of the above cabinet resolution dated 05/09/2016 vide
Annexure to Para 1 of letter Air HQ/99141/1/AFPCC dated 08th May
2017 & this is the final authority by
which all the existing X gp trades of Indian Airforce are entitled for an X gp
pay of Rs.6200 & it is also a fact that a new Non tech X gp trade namely
Garuda also includes in the Annexure with an X gp Pay of Rs 3600.
Further the
Air force Record office have revised the X GP pay of all existing technical of
trades contained in the above Annexure issued by Air HQ to Rs 6200 by issuing a new
PPO regardless of Pre & post 2016.
It is with in the Authority of the Service
Arms to decide about their technical trades eligible under cabinet resolution
for the purpose of X gp of Rs. 6200 & 3600.
The fact being so the action of the Mod in diluting the principles laid down by HSC for the revision of OROP from 01/07/2019 by issuing the above letter directing the implementing agency to divide the veterans between Pre & Post 2016 with the malafide intension to deprive them of their legitimate due is violative of HSC judgement & is an attempt to undermine the authority of the Highest judiciary of our country.