Saturday 30 July 2016
7TH CPC PENSION & ARREARS FOR MILITARY VETERANS(X) UP TO 80 YRS
Wednesday 27 July 2016
HAVILDAR-HON SUB CASE WON IN AFT KOCHI OA 69/2016 & OA 71/2016( APPLICABLE ONLY TO PETITIONERS)
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, KOCHI
O.A.No. 69
of 2016
MONDAY, THE
4TH DAY OF JULY, 2016/13TH ASHADHA, 1938
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. SATHEESACHANDRAN, MEMBER (J)
HON'BLE VICE ADMIRAL M.P.MURALIDHARAN, AVSM & BAR, NM, MEMBER
(A)
APPLICANT:
NO.13937814 M
EX- HAV (HONY NB/SUB) RAJAN PILLAI.V.K.,
AGED 62
YEARS, AMC, S/O LATE SHRI KUTTAPPAN PILLAI,
ABHILASH
BHAVAN, MALAYALAPUZHA, THAZAM PO.,
PATHANAMTHITTA
-DISTT, KERALA STATE – 689 666.
BY ADV. SRI.
C.R. RAMESH.
Versus
RESPONDENTS:
1. THE UNION
OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE
SECRETARY,
MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (ARMY),
SOUTH BLOCK,
NEW DELHI -110 001.
2. THE CHIEF
OF ARMY STAFF,
INTEGRATED
HQRS, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE,
SOUTH BLOCK,
NEW DELHI -110 001.
3. THE
PRINCIPAL CONTROLLER OF DEFENCE
ACCOUNTS
(PENSION),
DRAUPADI
GHAT, ALLAHABAD, UTTARPRADESH – 211 014.
4. THE OIC
RECORDS,
ARMY MEDICAL
CORPS,
LUCKNOW
CANTT., UTTARPRADESH – 226 002.
, BY ADV.SRI.
TOJAN J.VATHIKULAM, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL.
-: 2 :-
ORDER
Satheesachandran, Member (J):
The
applicant, V.K. Rajan Pillai, is an Ex-serviceman, who retired from the Army
Medical Corps, Indian Army in the rank of Havildar and was subsequently granted
Honorary rank of Naib Subedar. He has filed the above application under Section
14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (for short 'the Act') for a declaration
that he is entitled to the benefit of Annexure A3 letter and revision of basic
pension at par with Naib Subedar. He has further sought for issue of a
direction to the respondents to pay
him pension
in the rank of Naib Subedar revising it from 1.1.2006 and corresponding
revision w.e.f. 12.6.2009 along with the entire arrears.
2. The
applicant has claimed benefits under Annexure A3 letter
No.1(8)/2008-D(Pen/Policy) dated 12th June, 2009 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Defence
(Department of Ex-serviceman Welfare), New Delhi. Under the aforesaid letter, Havildars
who have been conferred Honorary rank of Naib
-: 3 :-Subedar have been
granted regular pension w.e.f. 1.1.2006 providing them notional promotion of
higher grade of Naib Subedar. That letter reads thus:
“I am
directed to say that in pursuance of Government
decision on the recommendations of the Sixth Central Pay Commission contained
in Para
5.1.62 of
Chapter V of the Report, the President is pleased to decide that Honorary rank
of Naib Subedar granted to Havildars will be notionally
considered as
a promotion to the higher grade of Naib Subedar and benefit of fitment in the
pay band and the higher grade pay will be allowed notionally
for the
purpose of fixation of pension only. Accordingly, additional element of pension
of Rs.100/- pm payable to Havildars granted Hony rank
of Naib
Subedar as per Regn.137 of Pension Regulations for the Army Part-I (1961),
amended vide this Ministry's letter No.1(1)/88/D(Pen/Sers)
dated
6.11.1991 will cease to be payable. The notional fixation of pay in the rank of
Naib Subedar will not be taken into account for payment of
retirement
gratuity, encashment of leave, composite transfer grant etc.
2. This
letter takes effect from 1st January 2006.
-: 4 :-3. This issues with
the concurrence of Finance Division of this Ministry vide their UO No.2351/Finance/Pension
dated 3.6.2009”. 3. Though the applicant had retired from the rank
of Havildar since he was conferred the Honorary rank of Naib Subedar
subsequently he was entitled to have his pension refixed
in the
Honorary rank of Naib Subedar w.e.f. 1.1.2006, is his case for the declaration
sought for and the consequent monetary benefits thereto.
4. The
respondents have resisted the claims of the applicant contending that the
benefits under Annexure A3 letter are available only to those who retired on or
after 1.1.2006. The applicant and similarly situated persons, who retired prior
to or before 31.12.2005, are not entitled to the benefits conferred under
Annexure A3 letter, according to them. The applicant who
was
discharged from service w.e.f. 1.6.1998 i.e. much prior to 1.1.2006, is not
entitled to have revision of pension in the rank of Honorary Naib Subedar which
was conferred to him subsequent to his retirement, is the contention of the
respondents stating O.A.No. 69 of 2016
-: 5 :-
that Annexure
A3 letter is inapplicable to him. 5. We heard learned counsel for the
applicant, Shri.C.R.Ramesh and the Central Government Counsel Shri.Tojan J
Vathikulam, who appeared for the respondents.
6. The issue involved in the case is no longer
res integraas it has already been resolved under the Common Order passed
in O.A.No.100
of 2012 and connected cases by this Tribunal on
21st
August 2012, which had been moved by similarly placed personnel like
the applicant in the present O.A., Havildars conferred with rank of Naib
Subedar after retirement and all of whom pre-2006 retirees, claiming the
benefit under Annexure A3 letter issued by the Government of India. Repelling the
objections canvassed by the respondents that Annexure A3
letter is
applicable only to post-2006 retirees this Tribunal has concluded that pre-2006
retirees who had been granted Honorary rank of Naib Subedar after retirement
are also entitled to the benefits under the letter w.e.f. 1.1.2006 subject to
the condition that the sum of Rs.100/- per month paid to them after
O.A.No. 69 of 2016
-: 6 :-
1.1.2006 in
terms of Government Order No.1(1)/88/D(Pen/Sers) dated 6.11.1991 has to be
adjusted against the amount due on refixation of their pension. Analysing the
recommendation of the VI Pay Commission, acceptance of which form the basis of Annexure
A3 letter, this Tribunal has expressed the view that neither the Commission nor
the Government made any distinction between Havildars of pre and post-2006
retirees, who, after
retirement,
had been granted Honorary rank of Naib Subedar, in refixation of their pension
in the Honorary rank w.e.f. 1.1.2006. Decision rendered by the Armed Forces
Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench and also Lucknow Bench, wherein similar view was
taken in identical cases, were also taken note of in passing the common order
in O.A. No.100 of 2012 and connected cases to
hold that the
applicants in those cases, pre-2006 retiree Havildars, who had been conferred
Naib Subedar rank after their retirement, are entitled to the benefit of
Annexure A3 letter of the Government.
7. The
Original Application is allowed declaring that the applicant is entitled to the
benefits of Annexure A3 letter
O.A.No. 69 of 2016
-: 7 :-
No.1(8)/2008-D-P(Pen/Policy)
dated 12.6.2009 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Defence
(Department of Exserviceman Welfare), New Delhi w.e.f. 1.1.2006. The respondents
are directed to make payment of the due amount to the applicant within three
months, including the entire arrears to be computed w.e.f. 1st
January 2006. Amount of Rs.100/- per
month, which
has already been paid to the applicant after 1.1.2006 in terms of Government
letter No.1(1)/88/D(Pen/Sers) dated 6.11.1991, shall be adjusted against the
due amount as per this Order and payment of that amount of Rs.100/- shall be discontinued.
8. There will
be no order as to costs.
9. Issue free
copy of this order to both sides.
Sd/- Sd/-
VICE ADMIRAL M.P. MURALIDHARAN, (MEMBER (A)
JUSTICE .S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, (MEMBER (J)
Monday 25 July 2016
RTI LODGED WITH DESW FOR DL-33
Kindly
furnish the following information with respect to De-linking of 33 years
service for 50% pension to pre-2006 PBOR pensioners.
1)
Whether Govt has accepted in principle to De-link 33 years service for granting
50% pension to pre-2006 PBOR pensioners.
2)
If so the reason for delay in issuing the relevant circular even after issuing
the same to civilian pensioners 2 months ago.
3)
Can you furnish a probable date of issuing the circular
MBC MENON
Administrator
National Federation Of Ex-service Men
Online RTI Status Form
Saturday 23 July 2016
A PEOM BY VETERAN PRAVEEN--" MY CHILDHOOD DAYS"
If I flash back my memories,
to remember my,
“So called Child- hood days”. //
I can only
reach up to
when I was just four years old
or may be plus few more days. //
What I can recall,
Those were
the only golden days. //
I played
with my friends day and night. //
Without any
worries ,
They were all just out of sight. //
I was showered
all the love from all around. //
That was the
real and great family bound. //
As I grew a
bit older,
may be another
year or two. //
Imposing of
restriction started,
though they
were very few. //
Learning
things was an experience,
To me, which
was all new //
Today if
recall my those days,
I can only
say,
They were just
like drops of morning dew. //
I reached my
early teen very soon. //
The life had
turned to a full summer noon. //
The burden
of studies,
The fear of
Teachers,
Made me upset every day. //
The child
hood started turning,
From the white to the grey. //
The body
started taking a new shape,
The new
experience was on its way. //
The changes
were noticed by all,
That is the
game, with all, the nature play. //
Many more
restrictions from the parents,
Starting
pouring in from all the ways. //
That made me
to think in many ways. //
Deeply I
started thinking everything twice. //
Am I the
same child who, at one time,
Was one of
their own rejoice.? //
Is this the end of the childhood.? //
That is how the world is,
Of late that I really understood. //
This was the actual age. //
When self decisions in the life,
Were actually to be made. //
Thursday 21 July 2016
Questions raised in Parliament regarding 7th CPC Notification and Fitment Factor
7th Central Pay Commission recommendations
The Government has decided to implement
the recommendations of the 7th Central Pay Commission relating to pay,
pension and related issues. The requisite notifications are being issued shortly.
The increase in pay as recommended by
the 7th Central Pay commission is based on the detailed deliberations by
the Commission keeping in view all relevant factors having a bearing
upon the prevailing circumstances
Employee Associations of Central
Government had given a call for strike with effect from 11.07.2016 which
has since been deferred. However, the Government is responsive to the
concerns of the Employees’ Association and it would be the endeavour of
the Government to ensure that the eventuality of a strike does not
arise.
In view of the multiplication factor
having been accepted based on the recommendations of the 7th Central Pay
commission, no such proposal is under consideration of the Government,
at present.
This was stated by the Minister of
Finance Shri.Arun Jaitley in a written reply to a question by the Shri
Neeraj Shekhar in the Rajya Sabha on 19.7.2016.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)