VOPIANS PAY HOMAGE TO ADVOVATE OF THE DOCTRINE OF OROP COL INDERJEET SINGH- PLEASE ACCEPT OUR LAST SALUTE SIR

SUPREME COURT INDICATES TO DISPOSE OF OROP CASE ON 18/11/2020

OROP CASE HEARING UPDATE AS ON 28/10/2020

 OROP case was listed at S. no 25 in court no 6 of Justice Dr YV Chandrachud and justice Indira Banergee for virtual hearing today 28 Oct 2020.
UOI was represented by
Attorney General of India Mr N Venkatraman
Lawyer M/s Priyanka
Lawyer Mr Arvind Kumar
OROP was represented by
SR lawyer Mr Hujefa Ahmadi
AOR Mr Balaji Srinivasan
Lawyer Arunava Mukherjee
Lawyer Garima Jain
In attendance
MAJ Gen Satbir Singh SM Chairman IESM
Gp Capt VK Gandhi Vice Chairman. IESM.
Our turn came At 1350 and Justice Chandrachud advised that this case arguments and counter arguments will need three to four hrs and we do not have that much time today. He suggested that we fix next date after Deepawali.
Our lawyer Mr Balaji Srinivasan insisted that last time also same plea was given. Balaji insisted that we are prepared for final arguments today. Judge gave next date on 18 Nov 2020 Wednesday. Justice Chandrachud recorded that it will be for final disposal on 18 Nov.
Our lawyer Mr Balaji Srinivasan requested that case may be listed on top of chart so that we will have sufficient time for arguments and counter arguments.
This request was acceded by court.
Next date of hearing for OROP case 18 Nov 2020 for final disposal.
IESM expresses gratitude to our team of lawyers who are representing IESM PRO BONO meaning without any fees.

Gp CAPT VK Gandhi
Vice Chairman IESM
28 Oct 2020.

OFFICE REPORT OF TIME BARRED COUNTER FILED BY IESM

RANK PARITY MISSING IN OROP

CALCULATION AND COMPARISON OF NEW SERIES DA WITH OLD SERIES DA

USE THIS SPECIAL DRIVE OPPORTUNITY FOR JOINT NOTIFICATION OF FAMILY PENSION IN YOUR PPO TO AVOID DELAY IN SANCTION OF FAMILY PENSION TO YOUR SPOUSE

Please Note that mere mention of your spouse name in Pension Book is not sufficient to saction family pension to your spouse.Joint Notification of spouse name in PPO is Mandatory & those who have not applied so far may use this opportunity to do so.The application form (Appendix-A) given below may be duly filled in triplicate with attested Joint Photograph pasted is to be submitted to DPDO/CPPC( PDA).Please do things which are necessary to be done for your family when you are alive. For more details refer the below given Circular on click

PROCEEDURE FOR PROPOSED ONLINE PURCHSE OF CSD ITEMS

WE HAVE STRONG POINTS TO COUNTER THE AFFIDAVIT OF AG IN OUR CASE IN HSC IF PROPERLY PRESENTED RESTRICTING TO CONTRADICTIONS & VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE 14 IN THE OROP NOTIFICATION, WE WILL BE IN A BETTER POSITION TO WIN THE CASE

PURCHASE OF MEDICINES FROM OUTSIDE ON PRESCRIPTION ISSUED BY ECHS EXTENDED UP TO 31 DEC 2020

OROP CASE IN SUPREME CIOURT A REVIEW

A GUIDE TO ECHS BENEFICIARIES

PBOR VETERANS ARE AT LOGGER HEADS WITH IESM OVER DEFFECTS IN PETITION FILED IN SC

UPDATES OF HEARING OF OUR OROP CASE IN SUPREME COURT ON 01/10/2010

OROP case in HSC was listed at S no 26 in virtual court 4 in SC in the court of
1. Justice Dr YV Chandrachud
2. Justice Indrani Bannerjee
Our side was represented by
1. Mr Hujefa Ahmadi SR lawyer
2. Mr Balaji Srinivasan AOR
3. Mr Arunava Mukherjee lawyer
4. M/s Garima Jain lawyer
5. MAJ Gen Satbir Singh IESM
6. GP Capt VK Gandhi. IESM
 GOI was represented by
1. Mr N Venkatraman ASG
2. Mr Narasiman. ASG
2. M/s Priyanka lawyer
Our turn came at 1330h, ASG Mr N Venkatraman requested the court that this is a very important case and Govt has submitted a consolidated Affidavit as per direction of the court. He further requested that Attorney General of India would like to argue this case but he is not available today and hence a date may be given by the HSC.
Justice YV Chandrachud accepted the request of ASG and gave a short date of 28 Oct 2020 Wednesday. He further stated that we will have final arguments on next date and decide this issue.
ASG Mr Narasimhan put across the point that 75% of defence budget is earmarked for pay and pensions. He further stated that comparison charts given by petitioners are not correct.
Mr Hujefa our lawyer strongly put across that the consolidated affidavit submitted by GOI confirms that Govt has given one rank many pensions (ORMP) in place of OROP. Mr Hujefa confirmed that charts submitted by petitioners are correct and we will prove it in next hearing. Mr Hujefa further stated that a great injustice is being done by Govt to veterans by not fulfilling OROP in its true spirit.
Mr Balaji Srinivasan requested that petitioners may be permitted to file a reply to consolidated affidavit of GOI. Justice Dr Chandrachud accepted this request and ordered that reply may be filed by 21 Oct.
Next date for hearing in HSC is 28 Oct 2020 Wednesday.
GP CAPT VK Gandhi
Vice Chairman IESM.
1 Oct 2020.

THE GOI FILED A COMPREHENCIVE AFFIDAVIT IN SC ON 24/09/2020