FLASH

WATCH THIS BLOG REGULARLY FOR LATEST NEWS ON ONE RANK ONE PENSION & OTHER SERVICE BENEFITS RELATING TO EX-SERVICE PENSIONERS,CENTRAL GOVT PENSIONERS,LIC/GIC PENSIONERS* A UNIQUE BLOG WITH 65 LAKHS VIEWERS & 600 FOLLOWERS #

Sunday, 10 August 2014

PRE 2006 3SLP CLUBBED WITH ALL OTHER SIMILAR APPEALS

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Civil Appeal No(s). 8875-8876/2011
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s)
VERSUS
VINOD KUMAR JAIN & ORS. Respondent(s)

with
Civil Appeal No. 1998 of 2012
Civil Appeal No. 3564 of 2012
Civil Appeal No. 3907 of 2012
Civil Appeal No. 4581 of 2012
Civil Appeal No. 4592 of 2012
Civil Appeal No. 4980 of 2012
Civil Appeal No. 4132 of 2012
Civil Appeal No. 4599 of 2012
SLP(c) No. 34799 of 2013
SLP(c) No. 36148-36150 of 2013
Civil Appeal No. 1856 of 2014
Civil Appeal No. 4233 of 2014
Civil Appeal No. 5999 of 2014
SLP(c) No. 16780-16782 of 2014
Date : 01/08/2014 These appeals were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Post on a non-miscellaneous day.
 NEXT DATEOF HEARING ON 16/09/2014

9 comments :

  1. NO COMMENTS - IT IS ONLY TIME PASSING GAME.
    YOU KNOW THE RESULT OF A DELAYED JUSTICE!!!! - ?????

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am hoping like hell that I will be alive when this final judgement will come and GOVT WILL IMPLEMENT IT

    ReplyDelete
  3. H.C.Delhi order dt.29/04/2013
    The High Court of Delhi has issued a writ f mandamus directing U.O.I. to refix pension of pre-2006 retirees in accordance with resolution passed by Govt.
    U.O.I is said to have filed an S.L.P in Supreme Court against the Delhi high court order perhaps on the grouse that they are obliged to pay only the parties to the suit settled-not others.
    What acquires significance is that the benefit of increased pension flows to retirees by virtue of rules and no discretion rests with the U.O.I,i.e discretionary power to restrict payment to select few as against lakhs of pensioners.
    The implication is that the dues of pre-2006 pensioners(barring a few) have been blocked and appropriated by the Govt. illegally.Justice demands that either all be paid or no one.Exercise of unintended power defeats the purpose of their own Resolution(notified and acted upon in a distorted manner.This smacks of prejudice and discrimination.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sir, we can't understand that on which grounds UOI submits in the court that CATPb judgement implies to the applicants only whereas in the judgement nothing like that is written.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sir' the orop will be applcable to all pre 2006 retirees not only to petisioers .let b j p govmt be settel down.hope i may be alive till that time.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Sir' on orop whate ex service man forum taking action againist uoi. Pls inform. Thank's d dutt sharma ey petty officeq indian navy .nainital uttrakhand.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Though I am one of the benfitiary of the arrears from 1.1.06 to 23.9.2012, I am sure in my mind I will not get anything. The BJP gives lip service to soldiers/Ex-soldiers but goes all out to block any benefit coming towards service/Ex-service personnel. Look at the amount of letters written to MOS(PP) by BPS & Others.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The decision of the SLP heard on 16.9.2014 by the Hon,court for implementing the CAT order dated 1.11.2011 be mentioned as the Govt. willfully denying the benefit to all except the petitioners which seems to be quite illegal. Bachan coach.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Sir mb though uttrakhand elect r over as naitionlist solder I voted for bjp
    But now I appeal to ex
    Men of Haryana n Maharastra not to vote if no orop .thanks petty officer d.dutt sharma ex navy Nainital uttrakhand.waiting comments from my ex men.mob
    09837618049

    ReplyDelete