A
special meeting was called by RM on 10 Dec 14 to which reps of 3
recognized Ex-servicemen Associations, including DIWAVE, were invited.
The officials who attended the meeting included DG(PS), DGR, MD (ECHS),
Secretary KSB, AFA, Joint CGDA and JS (ESW), in addition to RRM and Secy
(ESW).
2.Stating that the primary focus of meeting was OROP, RM
sought the views of the Associations on the issue . We responded that
the organization that is spearheading the issue is IESM who had already
briefed him yesterday and that we had nothing more to add.
3.
After listening to Lt Gen Balbir Singh, President IESL’s arguments, RM
stated that the implementation of OROP was not in doubt as it was a
solemn commitment of the Govt and BJP. The only question was of
modalities for future increases i.e. dynamic adjustments or in slabs. A
view was expressed that while granting increments until end 2015, the 7th CPC
could be asked to give formula for future adjustments. On the question
of expenditure figures, it was pointed out that whatever be the amount,
it would not appear significant when compared with Rs.12500 crores as
the cost of each DA installment which is twice a year. Also, a
commitment is commitment, whatever be the cost.
4.
After hearing pros and cons, RM indicated that he was in a better
picture and that while he would not like to bind himself with a time
frame, he is keen to take final decision as soon as possible.
5.
Before the meeting ended, we did bring to RM’s attention 2 priority
issues – a. Attitude and functioning of DESW and b. The dire need to
reduce litigation by effecting 4-5 changes in current pension policies.
It was decided that a small group comprising DIWAVE reps and DESW
officials would discuss the issues and put up recommendations to RRM
& RM. RM indicated that he would have no hesitation in withdrawing
legal cases if so warranted. Also, by end Jan15 he would call another
meeting on such issues.
3.
With reference to some reports about Shri Harbans Singh, former Dir /JS
Pensions likely to be brought back, we made it clear that such a step
would be retrogressive, because of his anti-veteran approach and the
fact the he alone was responsible for proliferating mindless litigation
against the disabled and war widows. The point was taken note of.
