Wednesday, 12 December 2018
HOW WE ARE BEING USED FOR THEIR BENEFITS & CHEATED
Monday, 10 December 2018
WHO FEEL LET DOWN & BY WHOM
Army Personnel Feel Let Down by Govt’s Refusal to Hike Military Service Pay
MSP
is given besides salary in recognition of the condition and hardship
faced by the armed forces while performing their duties.
Image for representational use only. Image Courtesy: Indian Express
The government’s rejection of
a long-standing demand of the armed forces for higher Military Service
Pay (MSP) for around one lakh personnel, including Junior Commissioned
Officers (JCO's), has left many upset in the Armed Forces.
The MSP is given besides salary in recognition of the condition and hardship faced by the armed forces while performing their duties. This concept was introduced in India in the Sixth Pay Commission.
Around 1.12 lakh military personnel, including 87,646 JCOs and 25,434 personnel of equivalent rank from the Navy and the Indian Air Force will be impacted by the decision. The armed forces this time round had sought a hike from Rs 5,500, as recommended by the Seventh Pay Commission in 2016, to Rs 10,800 per month in MSP for JCOs and other low-ranking officers in Army, Indian Air Force and Navy. Had the proposal gone through, the financial spending would have amounted to Rs 610 crore.
The MSP has two categories, including one for officers and another for JCOs and jawans. The Seventh Pay Commission had fixed Rs 5,200 as MSP per month for JCOs and jawans. This special allowance was fixed at Rs 15,500 for officers between Lieutenant-rank and Brigadier-rank.
The Army has been pressing for granting an MSP of Rs 10,800 for the JCOs, arguing that they are gazetted officers (Group B) and play a very vital role in command and control structure of the force. “JCOs perform a crucial role in the overall command structure and are the link between officers and men. It was not the right thing to treat the JCOs on a par with the jawans as regards granting MSP since JCOs are gazetted officers with long years of service” a source serving in the Indian Army told Newsclick who did not wish to be named.
Sources also claim that the Army Headquarters is anguished over the rejection of higher MSP to JCOs and the Defence Ministry is also miffed. In 2016, the three service chiefs had taken up salary-related issues including the "anomalies" in MSP with the 7th Pay Commission as well as with the top echelon of the government.
Subsequently, the Army had taken up the issue strongly with the Defence Minister and the three services as well as the Defence Ministry were on the same page on the issue.
“On the rationale for MSP, soldiers and their civilian counterparts in Central Government services cannot be compared given the fact the nature of duties performed by jawans and JCOs are more difficult. It is in this context that the armed forces for long were demanding a separate MSP for JCOs,” another military serviceman told Newsclick.
Retired Major Priyadarshi told Newsclick, “Legally, military nurses are paid an MSP Rs 10,800 as proposed in the 7th Pay Commission. Military nurses and JCOs are both Grade B officers, therefore JCOs are also entitled to a similar MSP. It is a very disappointing decision by the Government which has time and again claimed to be “for the army” and defence personnel.”
The Army operates in all kinds of terrain and weather conditions ranging from Siachen where temperatures range from minus 10 to minus 30, hot deserts of Rajasthan, inaccessible areas along the 750-km long Line of Control with Pakistan and 4,000-km Line of Actual Control facing China from Ladakh in the north to Arunachal Pradesh in the east. Similarly, Navy and IAF perform operational duties in tough conditions.
Priyadarshi further said that “the attitude of the Indian Government highlights the sad state of civilians towards the military servicemen.JCOs must be given due importance in recognition of their key role and to keep their morale high.”
The MSP is given besides salary in recognition of the condition and hardship faced by the armed forces while performing their duties. This concept was introduced in India in the Sixth Pay Commission.
Around 1.12 lakh military personnel, including 87,646 JCOs and 25,434 personnel of equivalent rank from the Navy and the Indian Air Force will be impacted by the decision. The armed forces this time round had sought a hike from Rs 5,500, as recommended by the Seventh Pay Commission in 2016, to Rs 10,800 per month in MSP for JCOs and other low-ranking officers in Army, Indian Air Force and Navy. Had the proposal gone through, the financial spending would have amounted to Rs 610 crore.
The MSP has two categories, including one for officers and another for JCOs and jawans. The Seventh Pay Commission had fixed Rs 5,200 as MSP per month for JCOs and jawans. This special allowance was fixed at Rs 15,500 for officers between Lieutenant-rank and Brigadier-rank.
The Army has been pressing for granting an MSP of Rs 10,800 for the JCOs, arguing that they are gazetted officers (Group B) and play a very vital role in command and control structure of the force. “JCOs perform a crucial role in the overall command structure and are the link between officers and men. It was not the right thing to treat the JCOs on a par with the jawans as regards granting MSP since JCOs are gazetted officers with long years of service” a source serving in the Indian Army told Newsclick who did not wish to be named.
Sources also claim that the Army Headquarters is anguished over the rejection of higher MSP to JCOs and the Defence Ministry is also miffed. In 2016, the three service chiefs had taken up salary-related issues including the "anomalies" in MSP with the 7th Pay Commission as well as with the top echelon of the government.
Subsequently, the Army had taken up the issue strongly with the Defence Minister and the three services as well as the Defence Ministry were on the same page on the issue.
“On the rationale for MSP, soldiers and their civilian counterparts in Central Government services cannot be compared given the fact the nature of duties performed by jawans and JCOs are more difficult. It is in this context that the armed forces for long were demanding a separate MSP for JCOs,” another military serviceman told Newsclick.
Retired Major Priyadarshi told Newsclick, “Legally, military nurses are paid an MSP Rs 10,800 as proposed in the 7th Pay Commission. Military nurses and JCOs are both Grade B officers, therefore JCOs are also entitled to a similar MSP. It is a very disappointing decision by the Government which has time and again claimed to be “for the army” and defence personnel.”
The Army operates in all kinds of terrain and weather conditions ranging from Siachen where temperatures range from minus 10 to minus 30, hot deserts of Rajasthan, inaccessible areas along the 750-km long Line of Control with Pakistan and 4,000-km Line of Actual Control facing China from Ladakh in the north to Arunachal Pradesh in the east. Similarly, Navy and IAF perform operational duties in tough conditions.
Priyadarshi further said that “the attitude of the Indian Government highlights the sad state of civilians towards the military servicemen.JCOs must be given due importance in recognition of their key role and to keep their morale high.”
Friday, 7 December 2018
7th CPC Central Government has rejected the main demand for higher Military Service Pay for Junior Commissioned Officers
7th CPC Military Service Pay (MSP)
Govt Rejects Main Demand
7th CPC Military Service Pay (MSP) - Govt Rejects Main Demand
Central Government has rejected the main demand for higher Military Service Pay for Junior Commissioned Officers.As per the media news today, the Army Headquarters was very upset over the decision of the Finace Ministry. Around 1.12 lakh military personnel including 87,646 Junior Commissioned Officers and 25,434 personnel of equivalent rank from the Navy and the India Air Force will be impacted by the decision.
The Defence Force Personnel, particularly the JCOs in Army, demanded to increase the MSP from Rs.5500 to Rs.10000. Earlier the 7th Central Pay Commission has recommended MSP Rs.5200 to JCOs.(Table shown the rates of MSP recommended by 7th CPC)
7th Central Pay Commission has applied a common multiplication factor of 2.57 on MSP of JCOs and ORs. As per methodology, the MSP has been raised to Rs.5200 pm from Rs.2000 pm.
The long pending demand on MSP that the commission forgot to consider that both JOCs and Equivalents are also Group 'B' Officers.
Whereas, the Group 'B' officers in Military Nursing Service, MSP had been fixed Rs.10800 pm. All JCOs and ORs (Combatants) demanded to raise the MSP to Rs.10000 pm at par with MNS Officers.
The 7th CPC recommended the rates of MSP was as follows:
| Designation | Existing Rate of MSP | Recommended by 7th CPC |
| Service Officers | 6000 | 15500 |
| Nursing Officers | 4200 | 10800 |
| JCO / ORs | 2000 | 5200 |
| Non Combatants (Enrolled) in the Air Force | 1000 | 3600 |
MSP will continue to be reckoned as Basic Pay for purposes of Dearness Allowance, as also in the computation of pension. Military Service Pay will however not be counted for purposes of House Rent Allowance, Composite Transfer Grant and Annual Increment.
The Military Service Pay, which is a compensation for the various aspects e.g., intangibles linked to special conditions of service, conducting full spectrum operation including force projection outside India's boundaries, superannuation at a younger age and for the edge historically enjoyed by the Defence Forces over the civilian scales, will be admissible to the Defence forces personnel only.
Friday, 30 November 2018
WHAT WE CAN DO WHEN THE FENCING ITSELF EATS THE CROPS
Forwarding of my representation to a wrong Department by DESW
|  10:05 AM (0 minutes ago) |
| |||
Respected Madam / Sir,
My
attached application to DESW has been wrongly forwarded to Directorate
of Army veterans instead of Directorate of Air Veterans.
I
am a Air Force Veteran & Ex Sgt M B Chandran, My service
particulars were clearly mentioned in my Representation.It is shameful
to the entire MOD/DESW that an officer responsible for the welfare of
Ex-servicemen do not know the Ranks in three services & their
respective Directorate of Veterans.
Due to such ignorant
people working in MOD / ESW, the pension Pension sanctioning of many
widows / Veer Narris were Held up for years together.
We
ex-servicemen were very much impressed by the Good Governance Program
announced by our Hon Prime minister Shri Narendra Modi, These type of
people working in various departments are torpedoing his Ambitious
program & this is the condition of Good governance Programme at fag
end of the five year Term of this Government.
As a Columnist I
used to Point out to the Govt,that ma,y Ambitious programs of this Govt
are Torpedoed by Bureaucrats lobby& this is a fine example that.I
am taking up this with the PMO grievance cell.
You are
Kindly requested to look in to this matter & take appropriate
corrective action with intimation to me. Copy of my original
representation & copy of wrong forwarding letter received is
attached herewith.
Yours Faithfully,
M B C Menonn
Friday, 23 November 2018
Monday, 19 November 2018
OROP HEARING NEWS FROM COURT ROOM. THE FOLLOWING MEMBERS WERE PRESENT IN SUPREME COURT
OROP case was heard in court no 13 Supreme Court in front of Honourable Justice Chandrachud & Justice Shah on 19 Nov 2018. Our side was represented by Sh VK Tankha, Sh Balaji Srinivasan, Sh Arunava Mukherjee, Sh Varun Chopra and M/s Garima. UOI was represented by M/s Pinky Anand and Sh Rana Mukherjee. Govt counsels argued that this petition needs to be dismissed but OROP counsels strongly represented that notice has been issued to UOI and counter affidavits has been filed by UOI and rejoinder has been filed by petitioners. We are ready for final arguments. We have very strong case that injustice has been done to ex-servicemen by Govt. While Govt is claiming that they have released OROP whereas the fact is that OROP has not been released and because of inherent conditionalities in even 7 CPC full advantage has been denied to old ESM pensioners. Judges took note of petitioners arguments and ordered that case be listed for final arguments in first week of Feb 19.
GROUP CAPT VK Gandhi.
Sunday, 18 November 2018
Incorrect/Wrong practice being followed by banks in payment of Defence Pension on e-PPOs.
Circular 207
No. AT/Tech/358-II
Dated: 12.11.2018.
To,
1. The Chief Accountant, RBI Deptt. of Govt. Bank Accounts, Central
office C-7, Second Floor, Bandre- Kurla Complex, P B No. 8 143, Bandre
East Mumbai-400051
2. The Director of Treasuries of all state
3. The Manger CPPC of Public Sector Banks including IDBI
4. The CDA (PD) Meerut..........
5. The CDA-Chennai..........
6. The Nodal Officers (ICICI/ AXIS/HDFC Bank).
7. The Pay & Accounts Officers.
8. Military and Air Attache, Indian Embassy Kathmandu, Nepal.
9. The DPDO............
10 The Post Master..............
Sub: Incorrect/Wrong practice being followed by banks in payment of Defence Pension on e-PPOs.
Consequent upon generation of e-PPO by this office for all categories of
Defence Pensioners, procedures for forwarding of e-PPOs by the Pension
Sanctioning Authorities to the Pension Disbursing Authorities and
e-verification of these e-PPOs were issued under this office circular
No. 588 dated 20.10.2017
The procedure mentioned in above circular clearly states that a copy of
e-PPO, duly digitally singed will be sent to the bank through SFTP
connectivity which this office has established with various banks and
through email id pcdapedp.cgda@nic.in to others bank and other PDAs
(except DPDO to whom the PPOs are forwarded through CGDA WAN) who have
not established SFTP connectivity that time. A copy of these e-PPOs,
duly digitally signed will also sent electronically to Army HQrs/Record
Offices(ROs)/ Head of Offices for scrutinizing and checking the same.
Army HQrs/ Record Offices(ROs) / Head of Offices were required to
provide to the PDA a hard copy of the e-PPO( after printing from the PDF
file) along with the descriptive roles of the Descriptive Particulars
of the pensioners.
PDAs were advised to affect the payment based on e-PPO received by them
through SF TP/email only after confirmation from the Army HQrs/Record
Offices(ROs)/ Head of Offices in the form of receipt of hard copy of
e-PPO and Descriptive Role and Descriptive Particular.
However, flagrant incidents of ignoring the above guidelines by the
banks have been noticed where banks are found making payment on the
basis hard copy of e-PPOs where PPO has been issued in favour of CPDA,
Allahabad instead of banks.
In view of the above, all the banks are requested that on receipt of
hard copy of PPOs from Army HQrs/Record Offices(ROs)/ Head of Offices
may invariably be confirmed with e-PPO received through SFTP and payment
may be released only if they are authorized to make payment by that
e-PPO. In case, e-PPO shows that PDA is other agency e-PPO may not be
acted upon.
(SANDEEP THAKUR)
Addl.CDA (P)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)