BRIEFING FROM MAHA RALLY OF VETERANS AT JANTAR MANTAR

Despite Boycott call by Sanjha Morcha,he rally was well attended byVeteransfromPunjab,Haryana,Delhi
Himachal,Jummu,UP,Bihar  even from Tamil nadu.The gathering was more than expected & is about to seven to eight thousand. 
 After the inauguration of Rally at about 11 am a delegation of 25 ESM including 4 veer Naris of Jawans Commanded by Gen Satbir singh met defence minister. The COAS was also present at the meeting along with The DM .
The DM had a cordial interaction with Gen Sabirsingh & other delegates. The DM also interacted with Veer Naris who explained that their family pension was less than the earnings of casual labor women. 
The DM assured the delegation that the modalities of  OROP  including family & disability pension will be completed by MOD BY 16 Feb & the same will be sent to MOF for sanction& allocation of sufficient funds in the budget.
He has also assured the delegation to obtain the approval of MOF by 28 feb & issue the implementation letter before 31 arch2015.Detailed letter from IESM will follow.

A TACTICAL MOVE TO THWART MAHA RALLY ON 1st FEB 2015

'One Rank, One Pension' spadework moving on fast-track, says Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar

By PTI | 31 Jan, 2015, 03.02PM IST

"In principle, it has been approved earlier. Discussions are on to fix modalities... By next week, the view of the defence ministry will be formed," Parrikar said.

NEW DELHI: Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar today said his Ministry would finalise modalities for the much delayed 'One Rank, One Pension' (OROP) scheme by next week and the file would be sent to Finance Ministry for further action.
"In principle, it has been approved earlier. Discussions are on to fix modalities... By next week, the view of the defence ministry will be formed," Parrikar told reporters here while declaring that the OROP issue has been fast-tracked and he has already held several meetings on it.
As and when the exact implementation status for the scheme is finalised by defence ministry, it will be taken up to the Ministry of Finance, he said.
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/ 
http://www.tribuneindia.com/news 
https://www.youtube.com/Watch Maha Rally 

ANNA STEPS IN FOR OROP

JAI JAWAN” “JAI KISSAN” DHARNA cum RALLY

SUB: Non Implimentation of One Rank One Pension , Land Reform Bill & Janlokpal Implimentation and Anti Corruption bills not passed till date

Dear Sir,

Shri Anna Hazare , a renound social activist is planning DHARNA cum Rally at Jantar Mantar / Ramleela Maidan New Delhi In begining of Mar 2015, to fight for OROP and amendments passed by Modi Govt in the Land reform bill directly affecting the welfare of Jawans and Farmers of our country.

This is to bring to your kind notice that Shri Anna Hazare ji HIMSELF BEING AN EX SERVICEMEN has been active in welfare of ex servicemen .He inaugurated Saheed Samarak (War Memorial )in honour of martyrs of Distt Baghpat (UP) on 09 Feb 2014 constructed by Ex Servicemen and Anna Samarthaks in memory of the martyrs who laid down their lives in extreme sacrifice for our country.

Annaji has been fighting for corruption free India, if so dont you think after giving promise of OROP at Rewari by Gen VK Singh and Shri Narender Modi as part of election speech prior to assembly elections and then not fullfilling those promise or diluting them in any way means nothing but cheating or we can say it is indirect corruption against expectations to gain votes.Annaji has decided to fight for OROP promised yet not being delivered.

We fully regard various ex servicemen organisations , both their identity as well as the precious work they have been doing for the welfare of ex servicemen. Some of us do get carried away for personal gains in term of rajniti and Money,but we can not stop working for unity just because of a few.We believe atleast 95% and above people who had the honour of wearing uniform have high moral values and utmost loyality.

Annaji is planning to have JAI JAWAN JAI KISAN rally in Feb/Mar 2015 at Delhi against all form of corruption where by we are going to demand Janlokpal/Lokayukts immidiate implimentaion along with 6 more anti corruption bills pending in loksabha withmain demand to immidiately impliment OROP without dilution for our jawans/exservicemen. The dates for the same will be decided at Ralegan with combined representatives of all exservicemen organisations.

PROVISIONAL PLANNING OF DHARNA & RALLY

• Dharna & rally shall continue till demands are met.
• First day probably 23 Mar 2015 ( saheed Bhagat Singh Diwas) shall be for demand of OROP.
• Rally shall be tentatively held at Ramlilla Maidan/Jantar Mantar.
• Representatives of various EX servicement Organisations only will be on stage with Annaji.
• Representatives of various EX servicement Organisations will be given 5 minutes to give their support and views.
• The rally will be 100% apolitical (No Politicals talks permitted)
• 100% attendance of members of each ex servicemen organisation to be ensured.
• Annaji karyakartas/Supporters from all northern states will attend.

In case Govt doesnt agree, Annaji shall be declaring darna till demands accepted.

Detailed planning shall be done at ralegan with Annaji along with all Ex Servicemen Organisations representatives.

In view of the above an initial meeting of all representatives of all ex servicemen organisations is required to be held at Delhi in the first week of Feb 2015. Kindly feel free for any queries.

Thanking you in anticipation.

Col Dinesh Nain

Chief Co ordinator

For Bhrastachar Virodhi Jan Andolan Nyas

Extention Office (H.Q. Ralegan Siddhi), New Delhi.

Mob: 09417057774 , Tel: 0172- 2520000,2520001,2520002,2520003,2520004

Forces seek new pension formula based on last pay

Ajay BanerjeeTribune News Service

New Delhi, January 12

The suggestions

• The memorandum says that 75% of last pay drawn should be the benchmark for calculating pensions for jawans
• In case of officers, 60%of last pay drawn be the benchmark
• The memorandum also says the Military Service Pay be fixed at 30% of basic pay for jawans and 15% of the basic pay for officers

Even as the retired veterans from forces are asking for one-rank-one pension (OROP), the ‘joint services’ memorandum submitted to the 7th pay commission has recommend a pension formula that is based on the last pay drawn. Sources told the Tribune that the memorandum submitted on behalf of the three services, the Army, the IAF and the Navy, to the commission has suggested that 75 per cent of the last pay drawn should be the benchmark for calculating pension for jawans. In case of officers, 60 per cent of last pay drawn be the benchmark for calculating pension. This demand has been put forward as the government is yet to implement the one rank-one pension (OROP). On its part, the government has accepted the OROP. Its modalities are being worked out over the past 12 months.
 The Rajya Sabha Petitions Committee chaired by Bhagat Singh Koshyari in December 2011 stated that clubbing the defence personnel with the civilian employees for pension purposes was not a considered decision. The committee laid down the definition of OROP: “It implies that uniform pension be paid to Armed Forces personnel retiring in the same rank with the same length of service, irrespective of their date of retirement, and any future enhancement in the rates of pension to be automatically passed on to the past pensioners. This implies bridging the gap between the rate of pensions of the current pensioners and the past pensioners and also future enhancements in the rate of pension to be automatically passed on to the past pensioners.” 
Three weeks ago, Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar had promised “OROP will be implemented....it has a lot of financial implications which are being worked out”. On the civilian side, the pension is 50 per cent of the last pay drawn and the same formula was applied for the forces in the last pay commission. The forces have argued that 50 per cent of the last pay drawn was more in tune for civilians. People in forces retire early and only 2 per cent of them make it to the rank of Major General or equal in the IAF and Navy that is at a par with Joint Secretary. 
The memorandum also says the Military Service Pay (MSP) amount is very small and suggested it be fixed at 30 per cent of basic pay for jawans and 15 per cent of the basic pay for officers. In case of disability pension, a minimum 10 years of service is required to be eligible. And if a person is injured critically within 10 years and cannot continue further in the forces, he cannot get pension. This 10-year period should be waived, the memorandum suggested.
Source:-http://www.tribuneindia.com/ 

UNACCEPTABLE DELAY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ONE RANK ONE PENSION

 To
General VK Singh (Retd), Member of Parliament,                
Union Minister of State (Independent Charge), 
Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation;  Union Minister of State, 
Ministry of External Affairs and Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs
36, Aurangzeb Road, New Delhi – 110011
 
Maj Gen Bhuwan Chandra Khanduri, AVSM (Retd)
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)
7, K. Kamraj Lane, New Delhi – 110011
Jai Durga Niwas, 12, Vikas Marg,
Pauri Garhwal-246001 (Uttarakhand)

Col Sona Ram Choudhary (Retd)
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)
9, Talkatora Road, New Delhi -110001
181/Ajit Colony, Circuit House Road, 
Jodhpur, Rajasthan

Col Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore (Retd)
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)
C-26, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan

Shri Rajeev Chandrasekhar, 
Member of Parliament
211, North Avenue, New Delhi -110001
Jupiter Innovision Centre, 54, 
Richmond Road, Bangalore -560025

Smt. Kirron Kher
Member of Parliament, BJP
C-191, Defence Colony, New Delhi -110024

Capt Amarinder Singh (Retd)
Indian National Congress (INC)
House No. 1669, New Moti Bagh Colony, Patiala


 Dear All,
1. We write this letter to convey to ESM MPs our serious concerns for the unacceptable delay in implementation of OROP.  You are our representatives and the voice in Parliament and the Govt.  We expected that you all will jointly and strongly take up the cause of soldiers with the Govt to get us due justice which has been denied to us by successive Govts for the past 67 years.  We have no doubt that you have been taking up the veterans issues including OROP at opportune moments at appropriate levels. But it seems that your efforts are not bearing fruit. The most important issue which worries ESM over and above OROP is that credibility of our erstwhile comrades and in particular Prime Minister Sh Narendra Modi is under question. 
2. Even after ten months of its sanction on 17 Feb 2014, statements like 80% assurances, 80% ESM will be satisfied, number of years in the rank, Rs 9300 crores are required etc  are being aired to delay or deny us the benefit.  You all have been part of the profession and know the details well. You all must have taken up the issue with the PM and the RM, but the implementation has not fructified. The interview of RM Sh Manohar Parrikar to Head lines today on 12 Jan has further demoralized the rank and file. He has now relegated decision on OROP to 25 July and has also cast a shadow of doubt by bringing the question that civilians will also ask OROP. 
3. You are aware that the definition of OROP has been sealed in May 2009 when UPA Govt ordered a Committee of Secretaries on OROP.  The present definition was projected to the Committee by the IESM which was accepted and is part of the Report of the Committee.  The same definition was accepted by the Koshyari Committee of Rajya Sabha which was presented to RS on 19 Dec 2011.  While accepting the principle of OROP the same definition has been accepted by two Parliaments.  The same is also included in the Executive orders of the Govt dated 26 Feb 2014 for the implement of OROP.   As late as on 02 Dec 2014 the RRM stated the same definition in the Parliament and confirmed the commitment of BJP Government for early implementation of OROP.
4. Based on the Executive orders and the approved definition in the budget and Parliament, the Service HQs had prepared DGL which was presented to the RM on 22 Apr 2014. Does it take ten months for a Govt to take a decision especially when it has been elected on the promise of good governance and with a solemn pledge that the Government will increase India’s security and will take care of its military personnel? You will agree with IESM that present arguments being extended by RM and MOD are only to delay and dilute the OROP definition. This is a very disturbing development and needs to be taken up very strongly by all of you. IESM is getting a feeling that Government is coming under pressure of Bureaucratic politics to delay and dilute the OROP or even to deny the OROP like congress Government did in 2009. A word of caution my friends is that your prestige will go down in the eyes of your comrades in case OROP definition is changed even 1% from approved definition.
5. If you all want to clarify any issue, on OROP, IESM will be privileged to do so at any time and place convenient to you all. 
  6. An ESM Maha Rally has been planned to be held on 01 Feb 2015 at Jantar Mantar from 10.30AM to remind/request the Government of its promises and for early release of OROP notification. You are requested to join in the Rally as an ESM.  It is now upto you honourable gentlemen and the Govt to facilitate us in converting our agitation into gratitude by issuing notification of OROP prior to 1 Feb 2015.
With regards,
Maj Gen Satbir Singh, SM (Retd)
Chairman IESM Mob: +919312404269, 0124-4110570
 Email ID: satbirsm@gmail.com

 

CLARIFICATION SAUGHT BY DM ON OROP

Veteran AVM RP Mishra is a Member of the governing body of the IESL and has been very active in this subject. A part of his letter is placed below for your information.
"I had received a telephone call some days ago (7 Jan I think) from the Hon'ble Minister of Defence. He sought a clarification on a suggestion put up by the bureaucracy that instead of total service, it should be the service in the rank that should be a parameter for deciding OROP. 
My clarification during the conversation was on the following lines:
1. The defence services have a complex structure with a number of different Arms/Services, ranks, Groups, Categories etc. No one formula can remove every single aberration in the over two million pensioners. When we stared the 'Movement', we had given detailed thought to the deciding of criteria. We chose 'total service' because this would give satisfaction to the maximum numbers.
2. Considering 'service in rank' would be unfair because the time of picking up a higher rank depends on many factors, that do not reflect on an individual's capabilities, nor are within his control. I cited the example of Infantry where different battalions in the same Regiment have a vast variation in the number of years taken to become a Naik, Havildar, JCO etc. Since they all retire after completing a uniformly equal length of service, it would be logical that the length of service should be the criterion. 
3. Even among officers, for example, I was promoted Lt Col after completing 15 1/2 years of service, whereas my colleagues in some other Arms would have been considerably delayed as there were fewer vacancies. While deciding OROP at least the latter should get the benefit of equal pension.
4. The proposal of considering length of service in the rank would also have administrative difficulty. While total service is clearly visible in the PPO, service in the rank would need fresh calculations, thus leading to considerable delay in implementing OROP.
The Hon'ble Minister confirmed that he had understood the issue and would not accept the bureaucrats' recommendation.
I had also recommended that the stalled meetings of the Joint Working Group should be recommenced to iron out any other angularity and thus speed up implementation of OROP. This was agreed to.
I had shared the details of above conversation with concerned officials at the Army Headquarters so that the serving and the ESM speak with convergence on this subject.
I could gather that there is urgency on the part of the Defence Ministry to finalise and implement this vexed issue. When implemented, this would give benefit to all future generations of pensioners. "
AVM RP Mishra, Veteran