FLASH

WATCH THIS BLOG REGULARLY FOR LATEST NEWS ON ONE RANK ONE PENSION & OTHER SERVICE BENEFITS RELATING TO EX-SERVICE PENSIONERS,CENTRAL GOVT PENSIONERS,LIC/GIC PENSIONERS* A UNIQUE BLOG WITH MORE THAN 1 CRORE VIEWERS & 700 FOLLOWERS #

FLASH

FlashFLASH**** UNION CABINET APPROVED OROP-3 REVISION FROM 01/07/2024 & CIRCULAR IS LIKELY TO BE ISSUED SOON **** New ***** *UNION CABINET APPROVED OROP REVISION FROM 01/07/2024 & CIRCULAR IS LIKELY TO BE ISSUED SOON
  • New











    .
  • Wednesday, 22 November 2017

    ORIGINAL TERMS OF REFERENCE TO OMJC AS GIVEN THROUGH RTI

    F No. 1(4)/2016/D (P/P)
    Ministry of Defence
    Department of Ex-Servicemen’s Welfare
    D (Pension/Policy)
    Dated: 20th July 2016
     To
    Hon’ble Justice L Narasimha Reddy
    Retired Chief Justice of Patna High Court
    Head of Judicial Committee on OROP
     Sir,
               Ministry of Defence, Department of Ex-Servicemen’s Welfare has issued orders on 7-11-2015 for implementation of “One Rank One Pension” (OROP) for the Ex-Servicemen with effect from 1.7.2014. Detailed orders in this regard were issued on 3.2.2016.
     2.      The Central Government appointed a Judicial Committee headed by Justice L Narasimha Reddy, Retired Chief Justice of Patna High Court on 14.12.2015. The Terms of Reference for the Committee is as follows:
    i.       Measures for the removal of anomalies that may arise in implementation of the OROP letter No. 12(1)/2014/D(Pen/Pol) Part II dated 7.11.2015.
    ii.      Measures for the removal of anomalies that may arise out of the three forces due to implementation of OROP order ibid.
    iii.     Implications on service matters.
    iv.      Any other matter referred by the Central Government on implementation of OROP or related issues.
     In making its recommendations, the Committee shall take into account the financial impact of its recommendations.
     3.       A Public Notice was issued on 13.4.2016 calling for representations from Defence Forces Pensioners/Family Pensioners/Defence Pensioners Associations on anomalies that may have arisen out of implementation of OROP order by 29.04.2016 which was extended up to 15.05.2016. Services Headquarters of Army, Navy and Air Force were also requested to bring to the notice of the Department of ESW, Ministry of Defence any anomaly that has come up due to implementation of OROP.  
     4.      Suggestions/Views in response to the Notice received from Service Headquarters and other stake holders have been examined by the Department of Ex-Servicmen Welfare. In terms of Ministry of Defence notification No. 12 (01)2014- D (Pen/Pol) Part II dated 14.12.2015, the following issues arising out of the implementation of OROP are referred to the Judicial Committee for making its recommendations to the Central Government:   
     (i)      Whether the benefit of OROP is to be extended to Reservists
     (ii)    Whether the decision to grant benefit of MACP under OROP only to Pensioners who have actually earned requires any modification.
    (iii)   Whether pension tables for more than 33 years of qualifying service are to be prepared.
    (iv)    Whether the methodology followed for fixation of pension under OROP in the absence of actual retirees in the same rank and same qualifying service for the below mentioned categories requires any modification: 
                             ( a)     Regular Lt & Capt getting same pension as Honorary Lieutenant & Captain
     (b)     Doctors of AMC/ADC/RVC for the ranks of Lieutenant, Captain & Major under OROP getting same as Hony Lt & Hony Capt
     (c)     Doctors of AMC/ADC/RVC for the rank of Major getting lower than the regular commissioned officers of the rank of Major.
     (d)     TA personnel for the rank of Captain/Major and Lt Col getting the same pension.
     (e)     Lieutenant/Captain and Major in MNS category where data              is blank
     (f)      Rank of Major in Regular Commissioned Officers getting
    Less than Major in EC or SSC category
    (v)     Whether the methodology followed for fixation of pension under OROP for invalidated out/war injury pensioners and liberalised family pensioners requires any modification in pension fixation formula
    (vi)    Whether in case of JCO/OR, the pension is to be paid on the basis of the last rank held instead of last rank pensioned under OROP
     Sd/------------------
    K Damatanthi
    Joint Secretary to the Government of India
    Tele No. 011 2301 1804
    Copy To: As per Standard Distribution

    Tuesday, 21 November 2017

    PRE-1986 PPO ISSUED FROM PCDA WITH OUT FAMILY ENDORSEMENT


    SPECIMEN FILLED UP DATA SHEET


    To
    THE DIRECTOR AV – III
    3rd FLOOR
    AFRO BUILDING
    SUBROTO PARK
    NEW DELHI-110010

    INFORMATION REQUIRED TO BE F'ILLED BY PRE-01/01/2016 PENSIONERS EX-AIRMEN/NCs (E) AND THEIR ELIGIBLE FAMILY PENSIONERS
    FOR REVISION OF PENSION UNDER 7th CPC

    Sl No
    Details Required Details to be filled bv Pensioner
    1
    NAME OF AIRMEN/NC(E)
    M B CHANDRAN MENON
    2
    SERVICE NUMBER
    293512 T
    3
    RANK
    SGT
    4
    TRADE
    WPN/FIT
    5
    DATE OF BIRTH
    00/00/0000
    6
    DATE OF DISCHARGE
    30/09/1987
    7
    DATE OF DEATH (FOR FAMILY PENSIONER)
    NA
    8
    AMOUNT OF PENSION DRAWN AT THE TIME OF DISCHARGE/DEATH (FOR FAMILY PENSIONER)
    Rs 592
    9
    FULL POSTAL ADDRESSS  WITH PIN CODE
     
    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    10
    AADHAR CARD NUMBER
    0000 0000 0000
    11
    PAN CARD NUMBER(SELF)
    XXXXXXXXXX
    12
    E-MAIL  ID
    Vinodvihar31@gmail.com
    13
    MOBILE NUMBER
    XXXXXXXX
    14
    BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER
    XXXXXXXX
    15
    IFSC CODE OF PAYING BANK
    SBIN0070517
    16
    BANK ADDRESS
    ( THROUGH DPDO ERNAKULAM HO NO 
    T09762)
    STATE BANK OF INDIA
    SA ROAD
    NEAR JANATHA JN
    VYTTILA-PO
    17
    ORIGINAL PPO No.(ATTACH COPY IF AVAILABLE)
    0814B1111887



    18
    CORRIGENDUM PPOS NO (ATTACH COPIES OF ALL)
    08/14/CORR/10505/88
    19
    D ISABILITY PPO NO (IF GRANTED SEPARATELY) ATTACH COPY IF AVAILABLE
    NA
    20
    LATEST CORR PPO No. OF DISABILITY IF NY(ATTACH COPY IF AVAILABLE
    NA
    21
    WAR INJURY ELEMENT %
    NA
    22
    DISABILITY ELEMENT% IF ANY
    NA
    23
    SERVEICE ELEMENT AS ON 31 DEC 15
    Rs 8778 (OROP)
    24
    DISABILITY ELEMENT AS ON 31 DEC 15
    NA
    25
    LFP/SFP/OFP GRANTED( IN CASE OF FAMILY PENSIONER)
    NA
    26
    WAR INJURY ELEMENT AS ON 31 DEC 15(IF ANY)
    NA
    27
    FAMILY PENSION SHARE % (IN CASE OF DIVISION OF FAMILY PENSION%  SHARE)
    NA
    28
    WHETHER PENSION NOTIFIED AS PER COURT ORDER (YES/NO).
    NO
    29
    NAME OF SPOUSE/ FAMILY PENSIONER
    XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    a)
    DATE OF BERTH (spouse)
    00/00/0000
    b)
    PAN NUMBER (spouse)
    XXXXXXXXXX
    c)
    AADHAR CARD NUMBER(spouse)
    0000 0000 0000
    d)
    MOBILE NUMBER
    xxxxxxxxxxxx
    e)
    E-MAIL ID
    Vinodvihar31@gmail.com

     Date:                                                          Signature of Pensioner

    Monday, 20 November 2017

    ORIGINAL PPO ISSUED IN 1987


    7th Pay Commission: Employees may not get good news on pay hike soon

    New Delhi: The long wait of central government employees for new pay hike may not end soon.
    FM Arun Jaitley figured out the best way to relieve pressure to form the National Anomaly Committee.
    The National Anomaly Committee (NAC) is expected to hold a meeting soon to discuss various points regarding the pay irregularities arising out of the 7th Pay Commission’s recommendations.
    The 22-member NAC panel is headed by Ajay Mittal, Secretary, Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) is likely to submit its report on pay irregularities to Finance Minister Arun Jaitley in December.
    A letter of Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) dated 30.10.2017 addressed to Shiv Gopal Mishra, Secretary, Staff Side, National Council JCM stating that the demand for increase in minimum Pay and fitment formula do not appear to be treated as an anomaly, therefore, these do not come under the purview of National Anomaly Committee (NAC).
    Finance minister Arun Jaitley had agreed to resolve the problems of minimum pay hike of central government employees, who had met representatives of several central government employees’ unions leaders on June 30, 2016 for almost two hours in home minister Rajnath Singh’s house with other two cabinet ministers—Rajnath Singh and Suresh Prabhu and assured them a high level committee would look into the increasing minimum Pay and fitment formula.
    Jaitley’s assurance had prevented several central government employees’ unions to go indefinite strike from July 11, 2016.
    Jaitley had promised to hike minimum pay after discussions with all stakeholders, so the government was under mounting pressure to form a high level pay hike committee and Jaitley figured out the best way to relieve pressure to form the National Anomaly Committee headed by Secretary, Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) in September, 2016 to look into pay anomalies arising out of the implementation of the 7th Pay Commission’s recommendations.
    “The high level committee has not yet been constituted. The National Anomaly Committee (NAC) has also not discussed pay hike agenda even though staff Side has repeatedly demanded discussion and settlement as per the assurance given by Union Finance Minister,” a central government employees’ leader told us.
    However, a top Finance Ministry official, who did not wish to be named told The Sen Times here today, “The National Anomaly Committee (NAC) is the high level committee and the government’s argument that the case of increase in minimum Pay and fitment formula, a jurisdictional dispute, which is beyond the purview of the National Anomaly Committee (NAC).”
    “Cases where there is a dispute about the definition of “anomaly” and those where there is a disagreement between the staff side and the official side of NAC on the anomaly will be referred to and “arbitrator” to be appointed out of a panel of names proposed by the two sides. However, this arbitration will not be a part of the JCM Scheme,” he added.
    The unions have been demanding minimum pay Rs 26,000, higher than the Rs 18,000 approved by the cabinet on June 29, 2016 on the 7th Pay Commission’s report and asked to raising fitment factor 3.68 times from 2.57 times.
    The sources said “ government may to go ahead for hike in minimum pay Rs 21,000 from Rs 18,000 and fitment factor may be raised 3.00 times from 2.57 times uniformly in next financial year.”
    Earlier, the government gave nod the 7th Pay Commission proposal of minimum basic pay from Rs 7,000 to Rs 18,000 per month while the maximum basic pay from Rs 80,000 to Rs 2.5 lakh with a fitment factor of 2.57 times uniformly of sixth pay commission’s basic pay.