May 21 at 10:54 PM
Ma'am,
I
am writing you this email in late night because I am not getting sleep
due to people calling day and night about this circular. Are we near to
issue this letter ?
The
environment is very curious about it as You might be knowing that
defence people (especially JCO/ORs) were chiefly affected by this
draconian rule. Why I called it "draconian" because we are made to
retire and then this rule was applied because we did not serve 33 yrs.
To tell you that When I was retired, I was merely 34 years old juggling
the roads of Mumbai for a job.
Anyway
that is a matter of law and system is responsible for that, not any
individual. But I sincerely request you to throw some light so people
can be assured & made calm.
I eagerly wait for a line of communication
Regards
Santosh K Singh
Ex PO
General Secretary-AFVAI
Fine script of e mail to remind and draw their attention.
ReplyDeleteYes ,dealy is cause of serious concern to soldiers .Anguish and sleepless nights to so many and so long.
Information re-posted to Sainik Darpan Blog
ReplyDeletehttp://sainikdarpan.blogspot.de/2016/05/letter-sent-by-gen-secretary-afvai-to.html
Regards
Editor Sainik Darpan
We believe the judicial committee's recommendations are benifitable to JCOs/ORs. AFVAI fwd details are simply understandable to committee. We want early issue of fresh OROP table (OROP table No 7).
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteSir please let me kmow the minimum pension of a POELR Y Group of INDIAN NAVY who served for 15 yrs of regular service and released ftom service in Feb 2002.
ReplyDeletefm 01 Jul 2009 = 4840
Deletefm 24 Sep 2012 = 5301
fm 01 Jul 2014 = 7550 - OROP
fm 01 Jan 2006 = 4186 revised
fm 01 Jan 2006 = waiting for OM
Rrcrieved yor reply.very many thanks.
DeleteWhen the circular for this regard wiii be issue.pse reply
Why this DESW exists if they failed to address the issue of the veterans. The separate org should be considered under MOD consisting of veterans only.
ReplyDeleteSir,
ReplyDeleteI have endorsed my view with regard to abolition of X and y group which is non existent in the case of officers. all should emphasis this point to the judicial commission whereby 90 5 problem would be solved
Pl let me know my BP after delinking of 33 yrs service for full pension on 1/1/2006, service 20yrs 2months, X gp, last rank held MCPO I of Navy,
ReplyDeleteBP drawn on 1/1/2006 8734(10296),10296 from 2009/2012.All arrears paid wrt 10296 wef 1/1/2006. OROP 12895 in force.
Pl let me know my BP on 1/1/2006 when my BP on 1/1/2006 was set 8734,subsequently revised to 10296 from 1/1/2006 and all arrears paid. Present OROP 12895. Total service 20yrs 2months,X gp, MCPO I from Navy; retired in 1988. Pl intimate me my BP after delinking of 33 yrs service for full pension.
ReplyDeleteWhat will be my BP from 1/1/2006 after delinking 33yrs service for full pension? My service 20yrs 2 months, X gp, MCPO I from Navy retired in 1988. BP set by 6th cpc as 8734 from 1/1/2006. However, BP revised to 10296 from 1/1/2006 and all arrears paid. Present OROP set is 12895. Pl clear position.
ReplyDeleteThere is nothing for pbor like circular 557. Jai Hind
ReplyDeleteBP after delinking of 33 yrs for full pension for : service- 20yrs 2 months, x gp, last rank MCPO I for over 14 months, OROP set 12895, BP from 1/1/2006 10296 all arrears paid.
ReplyDeleteAny communication between our Gen. Secy. (AFVAI ) and Madam Damayanti on the aforesaid subject.
ReplyDeleteIs madam K. Damayanthi still working hard ( or working hardly ??) on the notification?? Any update as on 15th Jun ??
ReplyDeleteWhat is the outcome of hard work for days/weeks/months on notification??? Any update as on 21st Jun??
ReplyDelete