RELEVANT PAGES OF AFFIDAVIT FILED BY GOI IN SCI FOR EXTENSION FURTHER 3 MONTHS FOR OROP RE-FIXATION

COPY OF ORIGINAL PPO - JWO GROUP X 23 YEARS, YOR 2018

CLICK BELOW TO WATCH THW LIST OF SAINIK REST HOUSES ACROSS THE COUNTRY

LIST OF SAINIK REST HOUSES ACROSS THE COUNTRY

OROP RE-FIXATION SCENARIO AS DIPICTED BY A CARTOONIST

By Mahananda Biswas (Biswasda)

अग्निवीरो को 4 साल के बाद नौकरी की व्यवस्था हो चुकी है ।

अग्निवीरो को 4 साल के बाद नौकरी की व्यवस्था हो चुकी  है । उनका आरक्षण इस प्रकार है। 

25% स्थाई सेना में ही बने रहें

10% रक्षा मंत्रालय 

10%  आसाम राइफल्स

10% CAPFs

10%  शारीरिक शिक्षा  टीचर खेल मंत्रालय

10%  civil aviation   

10% इंडियन कॉस्ट गॉर्ड

10% डिफेंस पब्लिक सेक्टर 

  5% विचाराधीन 

इसके अलावा प्राइवेट नौकरियों में भी प्राथमिकता मिलेगी

कृपया शेयर करें ताकि अब सर्वजिनिक संपत्ति  बर्बाद करना बंद हो सके

VETERAN MAHANANDA BISWAS FILES GRIEVANCE WITH PMO

Name Of Complainant

Mahananda Biswas

Date of Receipt

20/06/2022

Received By Ministry/Department

Prime Minister’s Office

Grievance Description

Honourable Prime Minister Sir,
I am a Defence Pensioner and thus is a beneficiary and stakeholder by any revision or refixation of Defence pension. Government of India, Ministry of Defence issued a notification on 07.09.2015 for implementation of One Rank One Pension with effect from 01.07.2014 for Defence Pensioners with well-defined salient features. The OROP notification clearly stipulated that: “The pension would be re-fixed every 5 years.”

Unfortunately, till now Department of Ex-servicemen Welfare failed to re-fix the pension on expiry of 5 years I.e., with effect from 01.07.2019 despite the order of Honourable Raksha Mantri as early as in 14 June, 2019. So, in effect Department of Ex-servicemen Welfare has violated the Government notification to the peril of pensioners like me and millions of other Defence Pensioners.

Though there was no suspension or injunction order of any Court of Justice on the OROP Re-fixation process, the Secretary, Ex-servicemen Welfare stated in a SCOVA meeting that the Re-fixation process was held up as the matter was sub judice. He was referring to HSC case WPC (C) 419/2016.

At present, that case is no longer sub judice, as the case is settled, and jurisdiction passed on 16 March 2022 by Division Bench of HSC. The Jurisdiction is attached herewith.

Sir, please refer to the points 50 and 51 of the HSC jurisdiction, where the Division Bench of HSC directed and ordered Government of India that “in terms of the communication dated 7 November 2015, a re-fixation exercise shall be carried out from 1 July 2019, upon the expiry of five years. Arrears payable to all eligible pensioners of the armed forces shall be computed and paid over accordingly within a period of three months”.


To utter disregard to its own notification and gross violation of HSC order, Ministry of Defence neither re-fixed the pension nor paid any arrears to me or any of the eligible pensioners

The failure of the executive to comply with an order of Highest Judiciary of the country is a grave cause of concern to me and millions of Defence Pensioners as a whole. It is emanating a wrong signal to the total ex-servicemen fraternity as well as to the serving soldiers.

I, as a Defence Pensioner is filing this complaint and urge you to direct Ministry of Defence, Government of India to immediately comply to the GOI notification and HSC order to re-fix the OROP pension with effect from 01.07.2019 and pay arrears to all eligible pensioners.

I am sure that your pro-active initiative to iron out the grievances of large section of society would lead us to the path of peace and progress.

Jai Hind.

Yours Faithfully
Mahananda Biswas
Ex-Sergeant of Indian Air Force.

MAGNIFIED VIEW OF GRIEVANCES WITH PRIME MINISTERS OFFICE LODGED BELOW

 Dear Sir,

I am a beneficiary and a stakeholder of benefits accrued consequent to the judgement in OROP Case WPC (C) 419/2016.
As per the judgement in the above case, you were ordered and directed to Refix OROP and pay the arrears within three months.
The time limit set forth by the HSC has expired on June 16, 2022.
Kindly instruct Ministry of Defence to Honour the Judgement in above case immediately Since the time limit set forth by the HSC for its compliance is already over.
This is sending a wrong message to the Public at large that that the Executive themselves have disregarded the HSC Order and Direction in the above case.
Yours Faithfully,
M B Chandran Menon
EX- Sergeant (Affected Military Veteran)

GRIEVANCES WITH PRIME MINISTERS OFFICE LODGED

A MAGNIFIED VIEW OF RTI FILED BELOW

 Dear Sir,

I am a beneficiary and a stakeholder of benefits accrued consequent to the judgement in OROP Case WPC (C) 419/2016.
As per the judgement in the above case, you were ordered and directed to Refix OROP and pay the arrears within three months.
The time limit set forth by the HSC has expired on June 16, 2022. Hence this RTI Request for sharing following details:
1) Kindly share necessary steps taken by you for not being treated as wilfully defying the court order & direction in the above case.
2) Kindly share the steps taken by you to ensure that you are not passing a wrong message to the entire public that the Executive themselves have disregarded HSC Order and Direction in the above case.
Yours Faithfully,
M B Chandran Menon
EX- Sergeant (Affected Military Veteran)

RTI FILED TO KNOW THE REASON FOR DELAY IN IMPLIMENTING COURT ORDER IN OROP CASE

4 YEARS AGNIPATH SCHEME FOR ENROLMENT IN INDIAN ARMED FORCES

CLICK BELOW TO REFER THE DETAILS OF 4 YEARS AGNIPATH ENTRY SCHEME TO DEFENCE FORCES

PRESENT PAY SCALE OF X GROUP SERGEANT 15YEARS

THE COMING DAYS WILL TELL US WHETHER THE FILING OF A REVIEW PETITION WAS IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION

The ex-servicemen community believes that the timing of filing a review petition in HSC has given the Union of India a shot in the arm to further delay the long-delayed implementation of the OROP refixation. Any layman can find that there is no legitimate basis or scope for filing a review petition before the same court that delivered the judgement. All our learned colleagues' arguments, as briefed by the managers of the legal battle, were flatly rejected by the court.

Many members of the impacted community were concerned from the start about relying on the Koshyari Committee report, which has no legal backing. We are at a loss to understand how those learned senior consuls consented to argue the case solely based on the report of the above committee, which has only advisory power and relied on parliamentary speeches. The overdependence on these points has diverted our attention from convincing the court regarding discrimination and arbitrariness in the original OROP notification based on an executive decision.

The basis of the review petition appears to have stemmed from the appellants' desperation, which will hurt the entire ex-serviceman community. The timing and impact of the review petition will almost certainly be detrimental to the interests of the entire ex-serviceman community. The Appellants, who were once advocates of the OROP campaign in the eyes of the ex-servicemen community, have now become roadblocks to the long awaited OROP refixation.

We are not blaming the appellants for their failure to win the case because winning and losing are both parts of the judicial process that must be accepted wholeheartedly. Having said that, the appellants' actions in filing a review petition after the judgement upholding the executive decision are not acceptable to the ex-servicemen community and are detrimental to their interests.

Last but not least, we are grateful to the appellants who pioneered the OROP campaign and brought the matter to judicial scrutiny where the bench ordered the refixasion as per earlier executive decision that was otherwise unlikely to be updated on the grounds that it had already been revised by the 7th CPC, as instructed by the Hon CGDA.