The Indian Ex-servicemen Movement (IESM) and others have challenged the government’s policy of periodic review of pension once in five years.
Supreme Court on Monday sought the government’s
response on a plea of an ex-servicemen’s body seeking implementation of
One Rank—One Pension (OROP) as recommended by the Koshyari Committee
with an automatic annual revision, instead of the current policy of
periodic review once in five years.
A bench
comprising Justices Dipak Misra and C Nagappan issued notice and sought
the response from the government in eight weeks.
The
Indian Ex-servicemen Movement (IESM) and others have challenged the
government’s policy of periodic review of pension once in five years,
saying such an approach was dilution of the February 26, 2014
announcement by which the revision in pension was to automatically pass
on to the past pensioners on an annual basis.
They
have contended that five-yearly periodic review did not meet the demand
of the ex-servicemen seeking OROP for the service personnel who had
retired with same length of service in the same rank.
“OROP is the uniform desire of all three defence services.
Ex-servicemen are presently drawing pension that is not consistent with
their rank and/or length of service. In fact, some ex-servicemen are
even drawing lesser pension than other ex-servicemen who retired with a
subordinate rank or (in the same rank) which is unjust and
unconstitutional,” the petition said.
It said that
the Centre’s February 3, 2016 letter sent to the chiefs of Army, Navy
and Air Force on OROP was “unjust, arbitrary and violative of Article 14
and 21 of the constitution.”
The plea sought a
direction to the Centre “that the pension of past pensioners be
automatically and contemporaneously enhanced, whenever there is any
future increase or enhancement in the rates of pension.”
It
further said the government should be directed to fix the pension on
the basis of highest pension of financial year 2014—15 and not 2013.
IESM in its petition has referred to the December 19, 2011, report of
Rajya Sabha’s Petition Committee then headed by Bhagat Singh Koshyari
which rejected all reservation advanced by the government while
“strongly recommending” OROP.
In its 142nd report,
the Koshyari Committee had said, “the Committee strongly recommends that
Government should implement OROP in the defence forces across the board
at the earliest”.
When d govt has not done anything regarding contempt of SC orders earlier and twisting instructions of SC it is very difficult to understand the logic of these cases.
ReplyDeleteThere seems no mechanism in the SC to check non compliance of its past orders by the GOI.
DeleteGood job..Thanks. It's really helpful :)
ReplyDeleteBreaking Hindi News, National Hindi News