FLASH

WATCH THIS BLOG REGULARLY FOR LATEST NEWS ON ONE RANK ONE PENSION & OTHER SERVICE BENEFITS RELATING TO EX-SERVICE PENSIONERS,CENTRAL GOVT PENSIONERS,LIC/GIC PENSIONERS* A UNIQUE BLOG WITH MORE THAN 1 CRORE VIEWERS & 700 FOLLOWERS #

FLASH

FlashFLASH**** UNION CABINET APPROVED OROP-3 REVISION FROM 01/07/2024 & CIRCULAR IS LIKELY TO BE ISSUED SOON **** New ***** *UNION CABINET APPROVED OROP REVISION FROM 01/07/2024 & CIRCULAR IS LIKELY TO BE ISSUED SOON
  • New











    .
  • Saturday, 22 April 2017

    A PAID NEWS TO LURE VOTERS BEFORE MCD POLLS

     Rs 5,000 crore package for Centre's pensioners after MCD polls
    NEW DELHI: The government is set to clear a Rs 5,000 crore package for pensioners after Sunday's municipal elections in the capital to address their concerns related to the award of the 7th pay commission for central government employees and seniors.
    The revised pension will be taken up by the Union cabinet along with three-four issues related to the pay of central government employees, even as a committee headed by Finance Secretary Ashok Lavasa finalises its recommendations for allowances for government employees, including an increase in the house rent allowance (HRA). The panel is expected to submit its recommendations next week but there are indications that the change in allowances may not take place immediately.
    "The revised pension scheme has been finalised and the government has postponed a decision due to the code of conduct for Delhi municipal elections. The cabinet may clear it next week," said a source, who did not wish to be identified.
    The pay panel had recommended an increment-linked pension formula along with the option for
    multiplying the pension based on the six pay commission's recommendations by 2.57. To quickly implement the suggestions, the government opted for the second option as the increment-linked pension model was seen to be difficult to implement. This has created a situation where those who retired by December 31, 2015 are receiving a lower pension compared to someone who retired a month later. For instance, someone who retired as a secretary before January 2016 is getting a pension of Rs 1.02 lakh compared to Rs 1.12 lakh for someone who retired at the end of the month.
    Now, the government is looking at two options -- one is to move to a new "modified parity-plus" formula, which links the pension to the salary drawn by someone who is at the same rank. The other is a formula based on the multiple of the sixth pay commission-based pension. A sources said the factor of 2.57 is also being changed to make the pension more attractive. "Basically, there will be two options for a pensioner and the formula that ensures a higher payout to the seniors will be given," explained a source.

    Friday, 21 April 2017

    Govt to clear Rs 5k cr sop for central govt pensioners

    Apr 21 2017 : The Times of India (Hyderabad)
    New Delhi:
    
    
    The government is set to clear a `5,000 crore package for pensioners after Sunday's municipal elections in the capital to address their concerns related to the award of the 7th pay commission for central government employees and seniors. The revised pension will be taken up by the Union cabinet along with three-four issues related to the pay of central government employees, even as a committee headed by finance secretary Ashok Lavasa finalises its recommendations for allowances for government employees, including an increase in the house rent allowance (HRA).
    The panel is expected to submit its recommendations next week but there are indications that the change in allowances may not take place immediately. The revised pension sche me has been finalised and the government has postponed a decision due to the code of conduct for Delhi municipal elections. The Cabinet may clear it next week,“ said a source who did not wish to be identified.
    The pay panel had recommended an increment-linked pension formula along with the option for multiplying the pension based on the sixth pay commission's recommendations by 2.57. To quickly implement the suggestions, the government opted for the second option as the increment-linked pension model was seen to be difficult to implement. This has created a situation where those who retired by December 31, 2015 are receiving a lower pension compared to someone who retired a month later. For instance, someone who retired as a secretary before January 2016 gets a pension of Rs 1.02 lakh compared to the Rs 1.12 lakh for someone who retired at the end of the month.

    Wednesday, 19 April 2017

    RTI REQUEST FILED ON BEHALF OF A WIDOW WHO APPROACHED NFOESM-IN SIMILAR CASES OTHERS CAN USE IT AS A FORMAT

    Online RTI Request Form Details

    RTI Request Details :-
    RTI Request Registration number DEXSW/R/2017/50207
    Public Authority Department of Ex-Servicemen Welfare
    Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
    Name Mrs SOBHANA DEVADASS
    Gender Female
    Address CC NO 46/475C, THREE STAR APPARTMENT , DON BOSCO ROAD ( OPP. PETROL PUMP), VADUTHALA- KOCHI-23
    Pincode 682023
    Country India
    State Kerala
    StatusUrban
    Educational StatusLiterate
    Phone Number Details not provided
    Mobile Number +91-xxxxxxxxxx
    Email-ID menontalk2u[at]gmail[dot]com
    Request Details :-
    Citizenship Indian
    Is the Requester Below Poverty Line ? No
    (Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters)
    Description of Information Sought
    From
    Mrs. SOBHANA DEVADASS
    CC NO 46/475C
    THREE STAR APPARTMENT,
    OPP: PETROL PUMP,
    DON BOSCO ROAD,
    VADUTHALA, KOCHI-682023
    ------------
    Dated: 19/04/2017
    TO
    PCDA Allahabad
    Sub: RTI Request regarding arrears Payable under PCDA Circular-568, Delinking 33 Years service for Pre-2006 Ex-service Family Pensioners.
    I am a Widow of a Short service commissioned officer of the following Particulars.
    SERVICE NO- SS 25625A
    RANK- CAPT
    NAME- K. DEVADASS
    SERVICE- ARMY
    Branch- Arty
    Qualifying service-13 Years
    NAME OF FAMILY PENSIONER-Mrs.SOBHANA DEVADASS
    Date of commencement of family Pension-30/04/1983
    PPO NO- -M/Family/135/88
    Bank A/C No-10367440372
    Disbursing Bank Branch-State Bank Of India,
    Perumannoor Branch,
    Kochi-682015
    CPPC Address- Centralised Pension Processing Centre (CPPC) ,LMC Compound, Behind Main Block, Vikas Bhavan-PO, Trivandrum-695033

    Name of Pension Sanctioning Authority-
    PCDA Allahabad
    I am entitled to an arrears of Payment as per PCDA circular 568 Annexure-A Column No 7 as applicable to Capt of ECO/SSCO ,Normal rate of family pension @ Rs. 9687 in respect of delinking of 33 years of service for Pre-2006 pensioners.
    The above is duly authorized by Para 4,5,6&7 of MOD letter issued by DESW Dated 30/09/2016 and attached to PCDA Circular 568.
    On my enquiry to CPPC, They have informed me that it is applicable only for pensioners who pensioned between 01/01/1996 to 31/12/2006 Vide their letter Dated 29/03/2017(Copy of letter attached).My present Basic Family Pension is Rs 9279 & Eligibility as per Annexure A column no 7 Normal rate of family pension for the Rank of Capt is Rs 9687(Difference of Rs 408). Hence they have denied me the arrears due to me w.e.f 01/01/2006 to till date on account of PCDA Circular 568 by rules which is not mentioned anywhere in PCDA Circular 568 or in MOD Circular DESW dated 30/09/2016 attached to PCDA Circular 568.
    Hence I wish to obtain Through RTI act ,Copy of the following documents from PCDA Allahabad for claiming my actual eligible arrears as per PCDA Circular 568.

    1) Copy of calculation done by PCDA Allahabad for arrears payable to me in respect of delinking 33 years service vide PCDA circular 568 Annexure- A column No 7 as applicable to family pensioners of the Rank of Capt -ECO/SSCO (Normal rate of family pension).
    2) Copy of letter issued by you if any restricting the benefits under PCDA Circular 568 to Pensioners who were Pensioned Between 01/01/1996 to 31/12/2005 as clarified by State bank of India,CPPC,Trivandrum vide their letter to me Dated 29/03/2017 (Copy attached).
    Yours faithfully,
    Mrs.Sobhana Devadas
    W/O Late Capt K. Devadass.
    Concerned CPIONodal Officer
    Supporting document (only pdf upto 1 MB)

    Saturday, 8 April 2017

    FRAUD IN THE NAME OF ARMY GROUP INSURANCE FUND (AGIF)

    Certain firms/individuals are cheating serving/retired army personnel by claiming to be Agents of AGIF or having tie up with AGIF.  They insist on serving/retired army personnel to become members of their Firm/Club by paying membership money.  The Firm then promises to facilitate the processing of claim/loan and refund of their pending money from AGIF.
    2.   AGIF has NOT employed Firm/Agent and has NO tie up with any one.  Therefore, beware of such fraudsters and not pay any amount to them. AGIF does not charge any money for payment of claims.  Particulars of anyone claiming to be Agent of AGIF may please be confirmed from AGIF by mail/Telephone at the following numbers :-
     
    ARMY GROUP INSURANCE FUND
    ADJUTANT GENERAL'S BRANCH
    INTEGRATED HQ MOD (ARMY)
    RAO TULA RAM MARG
    PO.  VASANT VIHAR
    POST BAG NO.14
    NEW DELHI-110057

    TELEPHONE NUMBERS
              
    MD  AGIF               011-26143757
     PDAS                    011-26143759
    Director (Coord)    011-26142369
    Director (EMI)        011-26143852
    Director (Claim)     011-26144837
    Director (Fin)          011-26149813
    Exchange AGIF      011-26142749
    011-26147230
    011-26151031

    Monday, 3 April 2017

    RTI pleas on pension issues should be decided in 48 hrs: CIC

     Business Standard
     Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 
    Right to information (RTI) applications seeking details should be replied to within 48 hours as it pertains to the "life and liberty" of the elderly, the Central Information Commission has held as it pitched for early redressal of such grievances.
    The Commission also directed that if an application is a genuine grievance of a pensioner, steps should be initiated within 48 hours to redress it.
    The directive of Information Commissioner Sridhar Acharyulu will come to the aid of over 58 lakh central government pensioners.
    Acharyulu in a recent order held that the information pertaining to of a person pertains to his/her life and liberty which is mandated to be replied to within 48 hours as per the Act.
    He said the moment an application on issue is received, there should be a mechanism at the entry stage to discover and identify if it reflects a related grievance.
    He said it should be brought to the notice of the responsible officer by the CPIO on the same day and if it is a genuine case, the grievance should be addressed. The result should be communicated within 48 hours, followed by redressal within 30 days.
    Acharyulu said considering the "living needs" of elderly pensioners, it is important that records of their dues should be considered as "life and liberty" related information under the Act.
    "The moment application on issue is received, there should be a mechanism at the entry stage to discover and identify if it reflects a related grievance/issue and should be acted upon immediately," Acharyulu said in his directives to Employees' Provident Fund Office, Raipur.
    He said all the cases relating to delay in fixation and payment of and also arrears shall be dealt with urgently, considering them as request for information concerning the life or liberty under section 7(1) of Act.
    "Any grievance regarding these issues should also be treated as 'right to life' under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution and the public authorities shall do all the needful to address the issue within 48 hours," the Information Commissioner said.
    Acharyulu said some authorities say that unless an imminent danger is there to life or liberty, this clause cannot be invoked.
    "It is an extraneous extension of imagination without any basis. The expression used in the Act is simply 'where the information sought for concerns the life or liberty of a person', which should mean it is enough if it concerns the life or liberty. That need not be in imminent danger," he clarified in his order.
    He was adjudicating the case of one Amrika Bai who had filed an application seeking to know discrepancy in the payment of to her.
    When she could not get proper response, she approached the Commission questioning non-payment of arrears of in a time-bound manner.
    "The arrears involved is only an increase of 4 per cent on the basic of Rs 1,986, which comes to Rs 80. Though it is a very small amount it matters most for an old age appellant, who lost her husband and depends upon sons or daughters," Acharyulu said.

    Friday, 31 March 2017

    LETTER FROM DESW REGARDING STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF SC JUDGEMENT IN NAVAL VETERANS CASE

      F.No.5(33)/2017/D(Pen/Legal)
                       Ministry of Defence
                Department of Ex-Servicemen Welfare
                            D (Pen/Legal)
    Subject : Seeking Information under RTI Act, 2005-RTI Application of MBC Menon
                    The Chairmen National Federation of Ex-servicemen dated 27.02.2017
         Please find enclosed an online RTI Request No.DEXSW/R/2017/50096 dated 
    27.02.2017 from MBC Menon, The Chairman National Federation of Ex-servicemen on the subject regarding the implementation of Hon'ble Supreme Court judgement in CA No.2147/2011 dated 27.10.2016 addressed to undersigned CPIO.  The same is transferred to you under section 6(3) of RTI Act 2005 for necessary action, under intimation of the undersigned.
                                                                                 Sd/ ....................23.3.2017
                                                                                      (A K Agarwal)
                                                                                       U.S.D(P/L-1)
                                                                                        Tel.No. 2301 5021
    CPIO  DPA(Navy) Sena Bhawan New Delhi 110011
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mod ID No.5(33)/2017/D(Pen/Legal) dated 23.03.2017
    Copy to
                     MBC Menon
                     The Chairman National Federation of Ex-servicemen
                      AC/149A, Shalimar Bagh
                      New Delhi, Pin 110088

    Thursday, 30 March 2017

    IF DISABILITY PENSIONERS HAVE ANY PROBLEM REGARDING IT DEDUCTION MAY CONTACT ADV,NAVDEEP SINGH(Rtd Maj)

    Law Office of NAVDEEP   SINGH                                 
    Advocate, Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Office-cum-Residence : # 1063, Sec 2, Panchkula – 134112, Haryana
    Phones : 099888-LEGAL, 093161-32817    Email : navdeepsingh.india@...
    Your reference :                                                                        
     Our  reference :
     To:
    Chairman-cum-Managing Director (CMD)
    State Bank of India, Mumbai
                                                                                          01 September 2016
    ILLEGAL DEDUCTION OF INCOME TAX ON DISABILITY PENSION BY THE STATE BANKOF INDIA IN CONTRAVENTION OF DIRECTIONS OF THE GOVT
    1.    Shocking instances have come to light wherein your bank has indulged in deduction of Income Tax at source in case of Disability Pensioners. On further inquiry, it has been informed that the action is based upon some ‘advice’ rendered by a Chartered Accountant that income tax exemption is only available to those pensioners who have been invalided out before completion of their service for normal pension, that is, those released earlier than 20 years in case of Commissioned Officers and 15 years in case of ranks other than Commissioned Officers, and that the said exemption is not available on the service element of those who have been released/ retired/discharged with a pension after serving more than 20/15 years of service as above.
    2.    Firstly, your attention is invited to Instruction No 2/2001 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes in this regard which amply explains the issue (Appx A). Your attention is also invited to Paragraph 88.3 of the Pension Payment Instructions issued to all your banks by the Government (Appx B) which leaves no scope of doubt regarding exemption of income tax from the entire disability pension, including service element. Moreover, the interpretation of your bank in this regard is absolutely incorrect, absurd and militates against the rules and norms promulgated by the Government as above. It may be recalled that Income Tax exemption on complete disability pension is available to defence personnel since the 1920s.
    3.    On discussion, it emerges that the confusion has been created due to the terminology of ‘Service Element’ which is hereby clarified for your benefit in the following lines. Disabled personnel who are granted disability benefits at the time of release from service are known as Disability Pensioners.  The said Disability Pension consists of two elements- service element and disability element. Both elements taken together are known as Disability Pension. There is no minimum qualifying service required for the grant of Service Element with effect from 01 January 1973. The calculation of service element however is different in cases of those personnel released from service before completion of pensionable service limits vis-a-vis those who are released on completing pensionable service limits. In case of the latter, the service element is granted at a rate equal to Service Pension. The fact that the pension granted for service in both cases is known as Service Element becomes clear from a bare perusal of Regulation 183 of the Pension Regulations, 1961, which contains two clauses, that is, 183(1)(a) for those who are released with sufficient service to earn a pension, and 183(1)(b) for those who are released before completing sufficient service to qualify for normal service pension. The said Regulation is enclosed as Appx C. Please note from the Regulation that in both cases the service part of the pension is known as Service Element. Even the normal service pension rates reflected under Regulation 183(1)(a)(i) are categorized as ‘Service Element’.
    4.    The fact that the service part of pension, whether a person is released prior to completion of service limits or after completion of service limits (20/15 years), is known as ‘Service Element’ also becomes clear from a perusal of the recent Circular No 554 (Appx D) issued by the Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pensions) to all banks, including yours. Paragraphs 1(i) and (ii) and then 1(iv) & 1(v) as well as Paragraph 6 of the same clearly stipulate that in case of disability pensioners, the amount of service part of the pension is known as ‘Service Element’ irrespective of the fact whether a person has lesser or more than 20/15 years of service. In simple words, the service element of pension in cases of those disabled personnel who have completed pensionable limits is equal to normal service pension, but being disability pensioners, it is nomenclatured as ‘Service Element’.
    5.    Even otherwise, it would be important to point out that disabled personnel released prior to completion of pensionable terms as well as those who are released on completion of terms or at own request are all treated at par as far as disability pension is concerned. In fact, all those who are in low medical category at the time of release are to be treated as ‘invalided’  as per rules (Also Appx C) as has also been held as per interpretation of teh pre-existing rules by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in CW 2967/1989 Mahavir Singh Narwal Vs Union of India decided on 05 May 2004 as affirmed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP 24171/2004 on 04 January 2008 and also in the recent decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civ Appeal 11208//2011 Union of India Vs Angad Singh Titaria decided on 24 Feb 2015.
    6.    In view of the above, you are requested to inform all your branches to cease and desist from flouting guidelines of the Central Board of Direct Taxes in this regard and direct them to honour income tax exemption on both service as well as disability elements of disability pensioners as was being done till now. It may be appreciated that the opinion of your Chartered Accountant cannot override existing law and rules that have been followed since times immemorial.
    7.    You are requested to issue directions to refund the illegally deducted amount to all affected disabled pensioners within a period of 7 days from the receipt of this letter.
    Thanking You
    Sd/-
    Navdeep Singh
    Advocate, High Court