FLASH

WATCH THIS BLOG REGULARLY FOR LATEST NEWS ON ONE RANK ONE PENSION & OTHER SERVICE BENEFITS RELATING TO EX-SERVICE PENSIONERS,CENTRAL GOVT PENSIONERS,LIC/GIC PENSIONERS* A UNIQUE BLOG WITH MORE THAN 1 CRORE VIEWERS & 700 FOLLOWERS #

FLASH

FlashFLASH**** UNION CABINET APPROVED OROP REVISION FROM 01/07/2019 & ARREARES WILL BE PAID IN FOUR INSTALLMENTS**** New ***** *UNION CABINET APPROVED OROP REVISION FROM 01/07/2019 & ARREARES WILL BE PAID IN FOUR INSTALLMENTS
  • New











    .
  • Thursday 10 October 2013

    News BUILD YOUR MONEY F1 LIVE BAN vs NZ (Test) NZ 353/9 (120.5) Video Ind vs Aus | Latest | Blogs | Chat | Apps | CJ Politics India South Movies Sports Cricketnext Football F1 Tech Auto MORE ibnlive » Video 30 Minutes: one rank one pension CNN-IBN | Jul 17, 2011 at 12:59pm On '30 Minutes' we look at the difference in pension between pre-1969 retire and post 2006 retire in the Army. IBNLive308 IBNLive 29 Related Latest Popular Modi summons DGP for update on sexual assault case against Asaram Modi summons DGP for update on sexual assault case against Asaram NGO takes widows from Vrindavan to Kolkata for Durga Puja NGO takes widows from Vrindavan to Kolkata for Durga Puja Ahmedabad police look to get Asaram's custody, Narayan Sai absconding Follow us Politics | India | Movies | IBN South | Cricket | Photos | Videos | Video Streams |World | Business | Sports | Blogs | Tech | Latest News | Talk | Citizen Journalist | Sitemap | Football | News | Books | Chat | Blaze | Apps | TV | Live TV | Time-Crunch TV | South India | India Global | Masand Review | Tennis | Golf | Formula One | Tech Toys | Documents | Newsletters | Health | Popular Newstopics | Team | Event | People | City | IBNLive Articles | Online Shopping in India | Get your child's brain buzzing at school | Give your child a HEADSTART at school | SOS tips for moms | Get 3 days free trial for your kids academics | Get free TextBook Solutions | India News About Us | Disclaimer | Contact Us | Feedback | Complaint Redressal | Advertise With Us | Latest Videos | Play Online Games | Live Stock Market News | India’s Premier Technology Guide | Privacy Policy | Hindi News | RSS Feeds | Kids education and games site | Firstpost | History India | MTV India | Online Survey-Internet User | Flying Machine Survey CNN name, logo and all associated elements ® and © 2013 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All rights reserved. CNN and the CNN logo are registered marks of Cable News Network, LP LLLP, displayed with permission. Use of the CNN name and/or logo on or as part of CNN-IBN does not derogate from the intellectual property rights of Cable News Network in respect of them. Copyright © 2013 IBNLive.in.com — All rights reserved

    Read more at: http://ibnlive.in.com/videos/168175/30-minutes-one-rank-one-pension.html?utm_source=ref_article
    News BUILD YOUR MONEY F1 LIVE BAN vs NZ (Test) NZ 353/9 (120.5) Video Ind vs Aus | Latest | Blogs | Chat | Apps | CJ Politics India South Movies Sports Cricketnext Football F1 Tech Auto MORE ibnlive » Video 30 Minutes: one rank one pension CNN-IBN | Jul 17, 2011 at 12:59pm On '30 Minutes' we look at the difference in pension between pre-1969 retire and post 2006 retire in the Army. IBNLive308 IBNLive 29 Related Latest Popular Modi summons DGP for update on sexual assault case against Asaram Modi summons DGP for update on sexual assault case against Asaram NGO takes widows from Vrindavan to Kolkata for Durga Puja NGO takes widows from Vrindavan to Kolkata for Durga Puja Ahmedabad police look to get Asaram's custody, Narayan Sai absconding Follow us Politics | India | Movies | IBN South | Cricket | Photos | Videos | Video Streams |World | Business | Sports | Blogs | Tech | Latest News | Talk | Citizen Journalist | Sitemap | Football | News | Books | Chat | Blaze | Apps | TV | Live TV | Time-Crunch TV | South India | India Global | Masand Review | Tennis | Golf | Formula One | Tech Toys | Documents | Newsletters | Health | Popular Newstopics | Team | Event | People | City | IBNLive Articles | Online Shopping in India | Get your child's brain buzzing at school | Give your child a HEADSTART at school | SOS tips for moms | Get 3 days free trial for your kids academics | Get free TextBook Solutions | India News About Us | Disclaimer | Contact Us | Feedback | Complaint Redressal | Advertise With Us | Latest Videos | Play Online Games | Live Stock Market News | India’s Premier Technology Guide | Privacy Policy | Hindi News | RSS Feeds | Kids education and games site | Firstpost | History India | MTV India | Online Survey-Internet User | Flying Machine Survey CNN name, logo and all associated elements ® and © 2013 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All rights reserved. CNN and the CNN logo are registered marks of Cable News Network, LP LLLP, displayed with permission. Use of the CNN name and/or logo on or as part of CNN-IBN does not derogate from the intellectual property rights of Cable News Network in respect of them. Copyright © 2013 IBNLive.in.com — All rights reserved

    Read more at: http://ibnlive.in.com/videos/168175/30-minutes-one-rank-one-pension.html?utm_source=ref_article
    News BUILD YOUR MONEY F1 LIVE BAN vs NZ (Test) NZ 353/9 (120.5) Video Ind vs Aus | Latest | Blogs | Chat | Apps | CJ Politics India South Movies Sports Cricketnext Football F1 Tech Auto MORE ibnlive » Video 30 Minutes: one rank one pension CNN-IBN | Jul 17, 2011 at 12:59pm On '30 Minutes' we look at the difference in pension between pre-1969 retire and post 2006 retire in the Army. IBNLive308 IBNLive 29 Related Latest Popular Modi summons DGP for update on sexual assault case against Asaram Modi summons DGP for update on sexual assault case against Asaram NGO takes widows from Vrindavan to Kolkata for Durga Puja NGO takes widows from Vrindavan to Kolkata for Durga Puja Ahmedabad police look to get Asaram's custody, Narayan Sai absconding Follow us Politics | India | Movies | IBN South | Cricket | Photos | Videos | Video Streams |World | Business | Sports | Blogs | Tech | Latest News | Talk | Citizen Journalist | Sitemap | Football | News | Books | Chat | Blaze | Apps | TV | Live TV | Time-Crunch TV | South India | India Global | Masand Review | Tennis | Golf | Formula One | Tech Toys | Documents | Newsletters | Health | Popular Newstopics | Team | Event | People | City | IBNLive Articles | Online Shopping in India | Get your child's brain buzzing at school | Give your child a HEADSTART at school | SOS tips for moms | Get 3 days free trial for your kids academics | Get free TextBook Solutions | India News About Us | Disclaimer | Contact Us | Feedback | Complaint Redressal | Advertise With Us | Latest Videos | Play Online Games | Live Stock Market News | India’s Premier Technology Guide | Privacy Policy | Hindi News | RSS Feeds | Kids education and games site | Firstpost | History India | MTV India | Online Survey-Internet User | Flying Machine Survey CNN name, logo and all associated elements ® and © 2013 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All rights reserved. CNN and the CNN logo are registered marks of Cable News Network, LP LLLP, displayed with permission. Use of the CNN name and/or logo on or as part of CNN-IBN does not derogate from the intellectual property rights of Cable News Network in respect of them. Copyright © 2013 IBNLive.in.com — All rights reserved

    Read more at: http://ibnlive.in.com/videos/168175/30-minutes-one-rank-one-pension.html?utm_source=ref_article

    Wednesday 2 October 2013

    CAT PB DIRECTS UOI TO PAY 50% PENSION TO PRE 2006 PENSIONERS WITH 20 YEARS OF SERVICE OR MORE IN OA 2461/2012

    Tuesday 1 October 2013

    WE WANT FULL PARITY AS PER COURT JUDGEMENT NOT EYEWASH AS PER ENHANCEMENT OF PENSION ORDER DATED 28.01/2013



     Dear elders,
    GOI circular dated 28/01/2013 is nothing but an eye wash to misguide the aged pensioners. I t has not conferred full parity to pre2006 pensioners as compared to post 2006 pensioners. It provides only a name sake hike to certain pre-2006 pensioners.
    Whereas the judgement in OA 655/2010 by cat PB has conferred full parity to all pre-2006 pensioners even though   the petition was for modified parity & counsel has not demanded full parity. It was one of the lacuna of this petition. Once pull parity is accepted it becomes a precedent & on that basis pensioners have the bargaining power to demand full parity in future pay revisions. In the absence of such precedent, pensioners have to go to court after each& every pay revision for full parity.
    The above petition has not been heard by Supreme Court but declined to interfere in the judgement of CATPB & DHC. The GOI is likely to approach the SC after contempt proceedings by CAT PB .If such eventuality arise the court is likely to hear the petition in full & it is doubtful whether full parity as per this  petition  can withstand the judicial  scrutiny.

     While this is the scenario It has come as a shot in the arm for pre2006 pensioners that another set of petition seeking full parity filed by a section of pensioners was rejected by CAT PB on the ground that similar relief had been granted in OA 655/2010.The pensioners approached DHC & got the petition referred back to CAT PB for hearing & separate judgement. The court is bound to grant full parity in this case also since full parity has been granted in OA 655/2010 even though it is not asked for.

    Now coming to the implication of al the above, majority of the pensioners will not get any benefit if pension fixed  as given in circular dated 28/01/2013 since the circular implies that the  pre-revised scale should be equated to the minimum of the pay in the pay band in the revised scale& not the pay in the pay band of pre-revised scale  to  the pay in the pay band of revised scale as given in concordance table in F.NO.1/1/2008-1C DATED 30/08/2008(fitment table  showing stage to stage fitment of 5th CPC  pay in the pay band  with 6CPC pay in the pay band) as applicable to post 2006 pensioners .This OM has given  full parity (stage to stage fitment )to post 2006 pensioners.

    The word MINIMUM plays a negative role in the fixation as per full parity to pre2006 pensioners. Here a pensioner of particular scale in 5th CPC having retired with maximum of the  pay in the pay scale gets only minimum of the corresponding pay in the pay band as per 6thCPC instead of placing him in the maximum of the  corresponding pay in the pay band as per 6th CPC.

    It means a pre2006 employee retired in 5th CPC scale (S14)7500-250-12000 with a basic pay of  9500 will be placed in the minimum of the pay in the pay ban d (PB-2 ) 13950 +GP  for calculation of pension as  per  6thcpc .It is to be noted that his is  the 8th stage of his increment & retired with a basic pay of 9500. His fitment  in 8th stage of  6th CPC   as per concordance table dated 30/09/2008 as applicable to post 2006 pensioners  is 17670+GP. Whereas after applying the word MINIMUM instead of corresponding stage it becomes 13950+GP, the starting pay in the pay band PB2. Here you may note the difference in the total quantum of basic pension, the former case by applying modified parity formula ,a pre2006 pensioner is entitled to a pension of 13950+4800(GP)/2=9375.But in the latter case by applying full parity formula as given F.NO.1/1/2008-1C DATED 30/08/2008 a pre2006 pensioner is eligible to draw a basic pension of 17670+4800(GP)/2=11235. 

    This anomaly can be removed only through full parity method which provides for stage to stage fitment as granted to post 2006 pensioners as per F.NO.1/1/2008-1C DATED 30/08/2008.The above case is an example & it is applicable for all pre2006 pensioners except those who are retired in the minimum of the scale. This is the essence judgement given by CAT PB in OA 655/2010.

    Another anomaly seen in the circular dated 28/01/2013 is the application of pro-rota condition to pre2006 pensioners having less than 33 years of service. Similarly Pre 2006 pay merger cases have not been taken in to consideration in the above circular.
    We have to understand the effect of full parity method by which a pre2006 a pensioner irrespective of his retirement date will be able to draw a pension   equivalent to one who retires today from the same post having equal length of service & equivalent basic .It takes in to account all the legitimate aspirations of pre2006 & post 2006 pensioners whether it belongs to past or future.

    Wednesday 25 September 2013

    1) 7TH PAY COMMISSION ANNOUNCED 2) CONTEMPT PETITION HEARD & GOI WARNED

    1)  UNION CABINET  TODAY DECLARED THE CONSTITUTION OF  7TH PAY COMMISSION FOR CENTRAL GOVT EMPLOYEES  & SEPARATE PAY COMMISSION FOR ARMED  FORCES. 
    THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE COMMISSION WILL BE EFFECTIVE FROM  01/01/2016.

    2)  THE CONTEMPT PETITION OF PRE-2006 PENSIONERS REGARDING NON-COMPLIANCE OF CAT PB JUDGEMENT IN  OA 655/2010 CAME UP FOR HEARING ON 25/09/2013.
    UPON HEARING BOTH THE COUNSEL FOR PETITIONERS & RESPONDENTS,THE COURT ORDERED THE GOI TO ISSUE THE ORDER FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE JUDGEMENT & APPEAR BEFORE IT ON 10/10/2013 OR ELSE GOI HAS TO FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS.

    Tuesday 27 August 2013

    ANOTHER SET OF PETITION BY PRE-2006 PENSIONERS REFERRED BACK TO CAT PB BY DELHI HIGH COURT



                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI  
     W.P.(C) 4572/2012  ALL  INDIA  S-30 PESIONERS ASSOCN( Petitioners) V/s  UNION OF INDIA  &
    W.P.(C) 7342/2012 CENTRAL GOVT. PENSIONERS ASSOCN ( Petitioners) V/s UNION OF INDIA
    CORAM:
    HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO   
                            O R D E R (brief)
    19.08.2013
    .Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, none of which are disputed by learned counsel for the respondents, with consent of learned counsel for the parties we set aside the impugned decision(s) dated March 06, 2012 and simultaneously we restore OANo.937/2010 and OANo.2101/2010 for fresh adjudication on merits by the tribunal n the claim of the petitioners for full parity. The decision shall be rendered after giving full opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and the decision dated November 01, 011 passed by the Tribunal in the case of S-29 scale retirees shall not be treated as binding upon it by the Tribunal for the reasons on the subject of full party, the said decision was pronounced notwithstanding said retirees giving up the claim for full parity. . The matter would be decided in remand as early as possible and preferably within three months from today. 10. Parties shall appear through their counsel before the Registrar of the Tribunal in the two original applications on September 09, 2013 on which date OA No.937/2010 and OA No.2101/2010 shall be listed before the Registrar. 
    The writ petitions stand disposed of. 

     No costs.                     
                                           
     PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.       V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.

     AUGUST 19, 2013


    Tuesday 20 August 2013

    GOI WANTS TO BUY TIME TILL GENERAL ELECTION

    Respected elders,
     Reports from ministry of finance & department of pension indicates that the GOI wants to buy time by filing another SLP in supreme court against pre-2006 pensioners .The main contention of the SLP is  on the the inability of the GOI to implement the court order due to huge financial implication. The GOI is learn t to have obtained legal opinion for the same.Their main aim of this move is to buy time till the the govt machinery is put on election mode by election commission. When the contempt petition is expected to come up for hearing in CAT PB on 25/09/2013, they are likely to  repeat the above excuse. All the pensioners associations are requested to rise to the occasion & thwart this move of the GOI.Here it is worthwhile  to mention that lakes of cores of rupees can be lost on scams like coal gate ,chopper gate& 2G  but alas.......GOI has no money for paying  few hundreds of cores of rupees to pre-2006 pensioners as ordered by court.

    Saturday 3 August 2013

    INJUSTICE DONE TO MIDDLE RANK PBOR IN DEFENCE FORCES BY 6th CPC
    Sergeants(group-x) in IAF, petty officers  in NAVY & havildars in ARMY who were placed in the 5000 scale by 5th CPC was placed in the PB-1 scale by 6TH CPC and the government did not  intervened to improve it as done in case of HAG scale of central govt employees. All central govt employees except defence forces who where placed in the basic scale of 5000 by 5th CPC was brought in to PB-2 .This is a clear case of discrimination against the middle ranks in the PBOR of defence forces and this anomaly is to rectified.

    Tuesday 30 July 2013

    UOI SLP AGAINST PRE2006 PENSIONERS DISMISSED BY SUPREME COURT

    The supreme court has dismissed the SLP (civil) 23055/2013 filed by union of India against Delhi high court judgement in pre-2006 pensioners case in WP 1535/2012 upholding the CAT PB judgement & Delhi high court judgement.The above SLP came up for hearing on 29/07/2013 & the apex court dismissed the SLP on the same day.Pensioners will now get arrears w.e.f.01/01/2006 if their revised pension was fixed at less than 50% percent of the minimum of the pay in the pay band including grade pay thereon in the revised scale corresponding to the pre-revised pay scale from which the pensioner has retired.

                           JUDGEMENT

         UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following 
                                            O R D E R
      We are not inclined to interfere with
    the order  passed  bythe High  Court. 
    Consequently, the special leave petitions
    are dismissed.  However, the petitioners 
    are at liberty to raise all points before 
    the Tribunal as and when the appeal, 
    including the contempt petition is
    preferred.
    
    
    

    Sunday 21 July 2013

    GOI IS MULLING OVER DELHI HIGH COURT JUDGEMENT IN PRE-2006 PENSIONERS CASE

    Reply by DOP&PW dated 21-6-2013 to RTI Query received by Natarajan Venkataraman Reg: Action taken by GOI on Delhi High Court Judgement - 'Copy of judgement dated 29-4-2013 received by GOI on 23-5-2013. Matter is still under consideration. No final decision has been taken by the Govt. as yet'.
    CPIO (Shri S K Makkar, CPIO/US to GOI), DOPPW vide his reply lr no 38/7/13- P&PW(A) dt 21st June 2013 states "I am to refer to your RTI application dated 22 5 2013 received by the undersigned
    on 29 5 2013.
    2.In regard to information sought by you, it is informed that the judgement dated 29 4 2013 of Hon High Court has been received in this Department on 23-5-2013. The Department is examining the judgement in consultation with Min. of Finance, Dept. of Expenditure and Ministry of Law. The files relating thereto are in continuous movement. The material information on the issue would be provided as and when a final decision is taken in the matter as has been in the past also.
    3.If you are not satisfied with the above reply, you may submit an appeal to the Appellate Authority. The Appellate Authority is Mrs Tripti P. Ghosh, Director (PP), Department of Pension and Pensioners' Welfare."


    Yours faithfully,
    Sd/-
    SK Makkar
    CPIO/Under Secretary
    to the Government of India. 

    Monday 8 July 2013

    STATUS OF THE CASES OF PRE- 2006 PENSIONERS IN VARIOUS COURTS : AS ON 01.07.2013

                            

    Item
    HEARD BY
    PETITION NO. & YEAR
    LEAD PETITIONER
    NEXT
    DATE
    FIXED
    FOR
    HEARING
                  REMARKS IN BRIEF
    1
    CAT-PB Delhi

    OA 1165 / 2011
    Pratap Narain & Ors Vs. MOP/flOP
    25.07.2013
    Case is for modified parity plus full pension on  20 years of service w.e.f. 1.1.2006. Govt. submitted its Counter on 11.07.12. Copy of Counter received on 17.12.12 and four weeks time was allowed for submission of  Rejoinder. In the meanwhile, MOP,DOP&PW vide OM No. 38 /37 / 08-P&PW(A) dated 28.01.13 has unilaterally issued orders accepting fixation of revised pension at 50% of sum of minimum of the pay in the pay band corresponding to the Table from which a pensioner had retired but prospectively i. e. from 24.09.12. Two issues are still remaining to be settled, namely, arrears from 1.1.06 and full pension at 20 years of service as per Cabinet approved Resolution dated 29.08.08.  
    2
    CAT-PB Delhi

    OA 2165 / 2011
    KR Srinivasan & Ors Vs. MOP/flOP
     25.07.2013
    Same as for  item 1 above.
    3
    CAT-PB Delhi

    OA 247 of 2012
    17 Petitioners
    25.07.2013 
    Same as for  item 1 above.
    4
    Lucknow HC
    Ser.Ben.203 / 2010
    s29 UP Officers
    15.07.2013
    The case is for modified parity  i.e. revision of pension at 50% of sum of minimum of the pay in the pay band plus the grade pay corresponding to the pre revised pay scale from which a pensioner had retired, in terms of  Resolution dated 29.08.08, effective 1.1.2006. Petitioners are pre 2006 Pensioners belonging All India Service Officers of Govt. of U.P. retired from pre revised pay scale of  Rs. 18,400-22,400. The U.P. Govt. implemented SCPC Report with certain modifications and issued G.O. No. Sa/3/1358 /Das-2010 dated 19.07.2010 fixing their revised pension at Rs. 26,500 w.e.f. 1.1.2006. The Pensioners grieance is that thier pension shold have been fixed at Rs. 27,350 w.e.f.  1.1.2006. The Court heard the case last on 1.7.2013, when as asked for by the Court earlier, UOI submitted a copy of the SCPC Report through a detailed affidavit. The Court is likely to hear the case again  in two week's time.     






         
    5
    Delhi HC
    WP(C)3359/
    2010
    s29,s26 Ex.ParaMil.
    No further date fixed for hearing so far as per website till 01.07.13.
    The case is for modified parity  i.e. revision of pension at 50% of sum of minimum of the pay in the pay band plus the grade pay corresponding to the pre revised pay scale from which a pension had retired, in terms of  Resolution dated 29.08.08, effective 1.1.2006. MOP,DOP&PW vide OM No. 38 /37 / 08-P&PW(A) dated 28.01.13 has unilaterally issued orders accepting fixation of revised pension at 50% of sum of minimum of the pay in the pay band plus grade pay corresponding to the Table concerning to pre revised pay scale from which pensioner had retired effective 24.9.12..Issue remains to be settled  is for  arrears from 1.1.06   as per Cabinet approved Resolution dated 29.08.08.    
    6
    Supreme Court
    Contempt Petition (Civil) 64/2009
    SPS Vains, Major General & Ors.
    29.07.13
    This case is for grant of Modified Parity in terms of MOP,DOP Resolution dated 29.8.2008, after including the same in Special Instructions. Petitioners are pre 2006 retirees Major Generals. MOD vide letter No. 1(11)/2012-D(Pen Policy) dated 17.01.13 has already   stepped their revised pension at  50% of sum of minimum of the pay in the pay band 4 plus grade pay and MSP, all corresponding  table of  pre revised pay scale from which they retired but w.e.f. 24.9.2012 and NOT  1.1.2006. Issue remains to be settled  isfor  arrears from 1.1.06, the date of implementation of SCPC Report.
    7
    Supreme Court
    Civil Appeal
    2966 / 2011
    U0I Vs SPS Vains Mj. General & Ors
    29.07.13
    This case is  same  as CP(C) No.64 of 2009 except  that in this case Petitioners are UOI & Ors. and Respondents are Pensioners. Issue remains to be settled  is for  arrears from 1.1.06, the date of implementation of SCPC Report.  Both cases are being heard  together by the hon.ble Supreme Court.  
    8
    Supreme Court
    Civil Appeal 8875-8876 of 2011.
    U0I & Ors.Vs. Vinod Kumar Jain & Ors
    (Avtar Singh)
       09 .07.13
    The case is for modified parity  i.e. revision of pension at 50% of sum of minimum of the pay in the pay band plus the grade pay corresponding to the pre revised pay scale from which a pension had retired, in terms of  Resolution dated 29.08.08, effective 1.1.2006. AFT has given Judgment in favour of Pensioners but UOI has gone in appeal to Supreme Court. In the meanwhile, MOD vide letter No. 1(11)/2012-D(Pen Policy) dated 17.01.13 has unilaterally issued orders accepting fixation of revised pension at 50% of sum of minimum of the pay in the pay band corresponding to the Table but prospectively i.e. from 24.09.12. Issue remains to be settled  is for  arrears from 1.1.06, the date of implementation of SCPC Report.
    9
    Supreme Court
    Civil  Appeal  5367 -5368    OF   2005
    Principal Sec.(F & P), Govt. of Andhra Pradesh Vs.   A.P. Pensioners Samaj.
    19.07.13
    Three Judge Bench Matter.
    10
    Delhi HC
    WPC No. 4572 of 2012
    All India S30 Pensioners Association Vs. UOI
    02.07.2013
    Full parity case wherein  writ, order or direction sought are : (a) setting aside the impugned judgment dated 6th March, 2012 passed by the Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A. No.937 of 2010; (b) calling for the records of the case from the Respondent Authorities; (c ) granting the reliefs prayed for by the Petitioners in their Original Application No.937 of 2010 filed before the Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi; and Judgment thereof.


    11
    CAT-PB/Delhi
    Contempt No.158 of 2012
    CG SAG (S29) Pensioners Association, Shri Satish Verma, Rtd.CE Vs. Shri RC Mishra, Sec. DOP, MOP,GOI. and Shri Sumit Bose, Sec.DOE,MOF,GOI.


    07.08.2013
    This Petition is against non-compliance of orders passed by CAT-PB while giving Judgment in case of  OA 0655/2010 with other OAs. In view of  IR granted by Delhi HC on 21.5.12, hon.ble Court on 30.5.12 closed the case with liberty to move application  for revival of  CP as per the Orders of  hon.ble Delhi HC. Accordingly, after the dismisal of UOI Petition in Delhi HC, the revival application was put up which was heard on 24.5.13 and 28.5.13 and orders for isuue of notices to respondents  were passed.

    12
    Supreme Court
    SLP (Civil) 19784 of 2013
    Haryana Viduat Prasaran Nigam  Ltd & Ors Vs R K Agarwal and Ors
    Date of listing for hearing for admission is not fixed till updating on 1.7.13
    This SLP is againsst Punjab and Haryana High Court Judgment in case of CWP No. 19641 of 2009 R K Agarwal &Ors. Vs. HVPN Ltd & Ors. dated 21.12.2012.



    Friday 10 May 2013

    AN APPEAL TO GOI BY PRE-2006 PENSIONERS

    We pre 2006 pensioners make an appeal to GOI  for implementing the mandamus issued by division bench of honorable Delhi High court in WP(c) 1535/2012.The high court has directed the GOI to implement the cabinet resolution dated 29/08/2008, in which the  recommendation of 6th CPC were accepted , w.e.f. 01/01/2006.we therefore make an appeal to  the honorable Prime minister   to intervene in this matter and issue necessary instruction to the department of pension for implementing  the cabinet resolution dated 29/08/2008 in letter and spirit  as directed by Delhi high court and release the arrears w.e.f.01/01/2006  without dragging the senior citizens of  our country to further litigation. The remark made by the high court in the judgement that they should not be burdened further in this matter shows the strength of judgement. The reasoning given by the court in this judgement will hold good even in the international court of justice. As you know very old and ailing pensioners are also waiting for this legitimate benefit, confirmed upon them by the court, this appeal may please be considered sympathetically at your earliest and the benefit may be disbursed to them on humanitarian ground before they breathe their last.

    Sunday 5 May 2013

    IMPLICATION OF DELHI HIGH COURT JUDGEMENT IN PRE 2006 PENSIONERS CASE

    Several central govt pensioners’ organisations have misunderstood the implication of judgement in pre 2006 pensioners’ case by Delhi high court in Gov appeal 1535/2012. They plead that the Gov OM dated 28/01/2013 giving improvement in pension to pre 2006 pensioners should be implemented from 01/01/2006 instead of 24/09/2012. The Delhi high court do not direct to implement this circular but it orders to implement the judgement in  
    CAT PB case no.655/2010 in which the CAT PB has directed to implement the cabinet resolution  accepting the 6th CPC report dated 29/08/2008 (which is published in gazette No. 305 dated 29/08/2008 section 1 Part -1.)

    The cabinet resolution confers  the  benefits of  fixation of pension of  pre 2006 pensioners as per the pay structure given by 6th CPC corresponding to the pre revised pay in the pay band  w.e.f.01/01/2006 where by disparity in pension between the pre 2006 & post 2006 pensioners is removed. It also gives the benefit of delinking full pension with 33 years of service w.e.f.29/08/2008. Accordingly those pensioners  who have more than 20 years but  less than 33 years of service will get full pension(50%of basic salary inclusive of grade pay) w.e.f. 29/08/2009 where by disparity in this case is also removed.  This  provision is denied in para 5 of the circular dated 28/01/2013 giving improvement in pension. It is true that most of the pensioners are having more than or equal to 33 years of service but there are few others who have less than 33 years of service .Hence it is requested that pensioners should not plead for implementation of circular dated 28/01/2013 w.e.f.01/01/2006 but should plead for implementation of cabinet resolution OM dated 28/09/2008 w.e.f.01/01/2006 which is the direction of the court judgement in govt appeal 1535 & cat order 655. 
    The most favorable part  of this judgement is that a mandamus is issued to UOI  refix the pension of respondents as per cabinet resolution within a period of two months from the date of judgement.

    Tuesday 30 April 2013

    GOVT APPEAL DISMISSED BY DELHI HIGH COURT IN PRE- 2006 PENSIONERS CASE


    THE CASE WAS HERD TODAY ON 29/04/2013
     AND THE COURT DISMISSED GOVT PETTION

    The case Wp(C) 1535/2012 filed by UOI came up for hearing today in Delhi High Court before the bench consisting of Justice Nandrajoga and Justice Kameswar Rao . Pensioners Advocate was personally present during  the  hearing. Apparently the bench had read Pensioners counter and the Affidavit. The futile attempt made by the Govt Advocate to confuse the bench had no impact. It was obvious that the bench was convinced about injustice done to pre 2006 pensioners. The pensioners Advocate got the opportunity to clarify certain points. The court finally dismissed the UOI petition upholding the tribunal verdict.

    CLICK THIS LINK TO REFER THE FULL TEXT OF JUDGEMENT