FLASH

WATCH THIS BLOG REGULARLY FOR LATEST NEWS ON ONE RANK ONE PENSION & OTHER SERVICE BENEFITS RELATING TO EX-SERVICE PENSIONERS,CENTRAL GOVT PENSIONERS,LIC/GIC PENSIONERS* A UNIQUE BLOG WITH MORE THAN 1 CRORE VIEWERS & 700 FOLLOWERS #

FLASH

FlashFLASH**** UNION CABINET APPROVED OROP REVISION FROM 01/07/2019 & ARREARES WILL BE PAID IN FOUR INSTALLMENTS**** New ***** *UNION CABINET APPROVED OROP REVISION FROM 01/07/2019 & ARREARES WILL BE PAID IN FOUR INSTALLMENTS
  • New











    .
  • Saturday 5 May 2012

    ONE RANK ONE PE3NSION LATEST NEWS



    Govt in agreement on 'one rank one pension': Army chief
    Posted on: 04 May 2012

    Sagar (MP):The Centre has given in-principle approval to the 'one rank one pension' demand of ex-servicemen, Chief of Army Staff General V K Singh said today. 'I have written twice to the central government on the issue of one rank one pension and it has agreed to it in principle,' he said while addressing a rally of ex-servicemen at Mahar Regiment Centre Ground here.
    He said the Defence Minister has assured to look into the matter seriously after the Budget session of Parliament. Implementation of one rank one pension will put a financial burden of Rs 1,300 crore on the Government, he said,
    adding all political parties have backed the demand.Once implemented, it will resolve all anomalies related to the ex-servicemen's pension and bring uniformity in the post-retirement scheme, the Army chief maintained. General Singh blamed communication gap for delay in redressal of grievances of the ex-servicemen.

    He said directives have been issued to officials concerned to ensure they are in regular touch with ex- servicemen and their widows and resolve their problems related to pension, healthcare and canteen facilities among others. General Singh said a toll-free helpline number was being launched to receive complaints of ex-servicemen and ensure their speedy resolution. The service will be headed by a retired Brigadier level officer. Army regiments and units have been directed to constitute special teams to look into the grievances, he said. the Army chief said after the formation of special teams Rs 22 crore was given to retired servicemen in pending arrears in Rajasthan. Earlier in the day, General Singh arrived at Bhopal Airport and left for Sagar, around 180km from the state capital, in a helicopte

    Friday 4 May 2012

    PRE 2006 CENTRAL PENSIONERS CASE LATEST NEWS

    • New Hearing of the case No WP 1535 / 2012 started on 4-5-2012 in Court No 3 of Delhi High Court - reg Appeal of Union of India against PB CAT Delhi Judgment in OA 655 / 2010. The case was "Part Heard" (Govt pleader completed his arguments). Further hearing will continue on Monday 7th May, 2012

    Friday 2 March 2012

    LIC PENSIONERS CASE IN SUPREME COURT NEW DEVELOPMENTS

    ·       SUPREME COURT CCP NO. 82-83/2012 IS POSTPONED AND POSTED TO 19 MAR 2012.

    ·      RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT CONTEMPT PETITION IS POSTED TO 27 MAR 2012.

    ·      SUPREME COURT SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION DATE REMAINS AS 16 MAR 2012.

    Contempt Petition in Supreme Court

    SUPREME COURT will take up Contempt Petition today.  We will wait to see what transpires in the Court.



    A version of the earlier Supreme Court proceedings is as given below:-

     

    Sri Salve requested the Bench to see that Union of India advises LIC to implement the orders.


    The Bench asked Sri Salve the exact amount.


    Sri Salve mentioned that the figure is not readily available.


    The Bench then asked him the amount stated in LIC Board Resolution.


    When Sri Salve replied it was around Rs 52 crores, Bench immediately ordered Sri Salve to ensure LIC deposits that amount within 3 weeks from today in Jaipur HC.


    SC Bench then told the parties that SLP will be pursued after expiry of that period.




    As per this version, Supreme Court has asked LIC to deposit a minimum of Rs.52 crores in the Court whereas LIC has deposited only Rs.4.35 lakhs.

    The order finally passed by the Bench, however, did  not specify the exact amount to be deposited.  It merely notes that the “amount due to the employees” should be deposited.

    It is hoped we will get some clarity in this matter.


    Feb 29, 2012

    SUPREME COURT DEVELOPMENTS