tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post5902384171627915588..comments2024-03-29T17:05:08.193+05:30Comments on . : IESM CLARIFICATION REGARDING SC JUDGEMENTM B Chandran Menon. M.com.,AIII,DMEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12408807503177898470noreply@blogger.comBlogger37125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post-52896145186355780392018-06-03T13:26:21.484+05:302018-06-03T13:26:21.484+05:30My mobile No 9815385808 and wrongly mentioned as 9...My mobile No 9815385808 and wrongly mentioned as 9815385080in above chatAVTAR SINGHnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post-49064552039994004442018-05-31T13:04:13.916+05:302018-05-31T13:04:13.916+05:30All Hony Lt/Capt retired after 01/01/2006 should c...All Hony Lt/Capt retired after 01/01/2006 should contact each other and go to court in one go as there is no response on the subject from concerned authority. My mobile No is 9815385080<br />AVTAR SINGHnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post-81525153682416710142018-05-28T15:49:18.536+05:302018-05-28T15:49:18.536+05:30Pl read my mobile number 9958113708Pl read my mobile number 9958113708HFO JK Prasadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12138026480608286696noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post-32815727160128558442018-05-28T15:46:06.061+05:302018-05-28T15:46:06.061+05:30This comment has been removed by the author.HFO JK Prasadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12138026480608286696noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post-50470698110008348782018-05-28T15:45:28.581+05:302018-05-28T15:45:28.581+05:30Pl read my mob No as 9958113708Pl read my mob No as 9958113708HFO JK Prasadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12138026480608286696noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post-62097931644155695712018-05-28T15:44:05.540+05:302018-05-28T15:44:05.540+05:30The then RM has approved the note on file for effe...The then RM has approved the note on file for effective date of notional pay and pension of post 1.1.2006Hony Lt/Capt wef 1.1.2006 on 4.4.2016.copy held with me.<br /> However, DGL is yet to be issued. This was informed to me in my RTI reply received in Jan 2018. Action taken after Dec 2017 till date sought thru RTI recently. If anyone filing suite in AFT may include me also. M 9958113708HFO JK Prasadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12138026480608286696noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post-2627955080190399402017-08-29T15:03:20.090+05:302017-08-29T15:03:20.090+05:30All Hony Capt/Lt who retired between 02/01/2006 t...All Hony Capt/Lt who retired between 02/01/2006 to 23/09/2012 to communicate to each other by means of as there is no notification from Min of Def to pay pension arrears to post retiree Hony Capt/Lt from their date of retirement to 23/09/2012 in the light of SC verdict which has already been impemented for pre 01/01/2006 retiree Hony Capt/Lt to enable all to appeal in the Court in one go on this matter. My mob No is 98715385808. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14448064160480307886noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post-68836548925101896202017-08-03T10:22:31.398+05:302017-08-03T10:22:31.398+05:30I would like to comment on the issue of revised pe...I would like to comment on the issue of revised pension to post-2006 honorary commission officers who have not received pension arrears with retirement benefits from the date of discharge at per pre-2006 wef 1/1/2006 must come out to the court (aft) for seeking right to challenge. Thanks. ByAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post-12926844121214798452017-07-15T10:16:10.666+05:302017-07-15T10:16:10.666+05:30I would like to know when government paid the arre...I would like to know when government paid the arrears to Hony lt/capt those retired between 01.01.2006 to 23.09.2012 whereas government had paid to them those retired per 01.01.2006.Ex Ris Maj Hony Capt Mohan Singh Manhasnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post-13950810707962591282016-12-25T15:17:12.299+05:302016-12-25T15:17:12.299+05:30I retireed from Army Corps of Signals on 01 Sep 20...I retireed from Army Corps of Signals on 01 Sep 2006 and my pension was fixed Rs 13500 pm from my date of retirement. The same was revised to Rs 15465 pm wef 24/09/2012 due to some anomaly noticed in 6th pay commission. However, Supreme Court in its verdict ruled that the anomaly notices at later date in 6th pay commission to be paid from 01 Jan 2006 on case filed by pre 01 Jan 2006. The same has been implemented for the pre 01 Jan 2006 and post 01 Jan 2006 retirees have been left in lurk. On approaching PCDA pension Allahabad they replied that they have received the instructions to pay the arrears to pre 01 Jan 2006 retirees and no instruction have been received for post 01 Jan 2006 which is an injustice to post 01 Jan 2006 retirees and now PCDA has issued 568 circular for delinking 33 year service for pre 01 Jan 2006 retirees according to which Hony Lt pension is to be fixed to Rs 15465 pm i.e. 50 percent of Rs 30930 fitment. Whereas post 01 Jan 2006 retirees Hony Lt pension was fixed to Rs 13500 pm 50 PERCENTAGEof Rs 27000. May I request you to confirm if post 01 Jan 2006 retiree Hony. Lt/Capt are entitled for revision of their pension from their date of retirement to 23/09/2016 or otherwise for our next course of action to get ratify this issue.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18112756622746012875noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post-83289168213518953412016-08-02T12:36:30.576+05:302016-08-02T12:36:30.576+05:30only a few persons have been paid their dues and ...only a few persons have been paid their dues and many in rural areas are still not pain these arrears. I think the notification be made public thru local news papers.<br />suresh kumar sharmahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09209742138864107895noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post-11659358825236436532016-07-25T13:54:11.862+05:302016-07-25T13:54:11.862+05:30It is very old news and passed 18 months I have go...It is very old news and passed 18 months I have got arrears Rs.3452/= only. Government is not going to give anything. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post-44610528761296559682016-06-06T14:57:54.738+05:302016-06-06T14:57:54.738+05:30Sir, I Avtar Singh retired from Army Corps of Sign...Sir, I Avtar Singh retired from Army Corps of Signals on 01/09/2006 as Hony Lt in active service and my pension was fixed Rs 13500/- pm from my date of retirement. The same was revised to Rs 15465/- pm wef 24/09/2012 due to some anomaly noticed in 6th pay commission. However, Supreme Court in its verdict ruled that the anomaly notices at later date in 6th pay commission to be paid from 01/01/2006 on case filed by pre 01/01/2006 retirees. The same has been implemented for the pre 01/01/2006 and post 01/01/2006 retirees have been left in lurk. On approaching PCDA pension Allahabad they replied that they have received the instructions to pay the arrears to pre 01/01/2006 retirees and no instruction have been received for post 01/01/2006 which is an injustice to post 10/01/2006 retirees and now created an anomaly for post 01/01/2006 retirees. Post 01/01/2006 retirees are also entitled for revision of their pension from their date of retirement to 23/09/2016 as the Supreme Court ruled in its verdict that arrears to be paid to all. Govt should pay attention to resolve this problem to avoid rushing the post 01/01/2006 to The Court to get justice done to them.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14448064160480307886noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post-44371340410246170802016-02-29T14:36:56.259+05:302016-02-29T14:36:56.259+05:30Sir,I am receiving my revised pension Rs 15465/- p...Sir,I am receiving my revised pension Rs 15465/- per month wef 24 Sep 2012 as per CDA circular. I retire wef 01 Jan 2008 and received my revised pension wef 24 Sep 2012. Now as per Supreme court verdict, the arrears of pension would be paid wef 01 Jan 2006. Please clarify that I am eligible for pension arrears wef 01 Jan 2008 (ie the date of retirement) to 23 Sep 2012 or otherwise.I hope PCDA will clarify the same for the welfare of all those who retire between 01 Jan 2006 to 23 Sep 2012. Ravindra Mohan Gusainhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05214952628572100496noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post-52264325133313943652015-11-12T18:23:37.380+05:302015-11-12T18:23:37.380+05:30Sir,
I am a defence veteran retired on 5 Ja...Sir,<br /><br /> I am a defence veteran retired on 5 Jan 1980 as Hav with 16 years service. I was given Rs 3729/- pension from 1.1.2006, Rs4837/- from 1.7.2009 and Rs 5531/- from 24.9.2012. I was given arrears of Rs 14,200/- ie minimum guaranteed pension minus pension drawn as on 1.1.2006 for the period from 1.1.2006 to 30.6.2009. The minimum guaranteed pension is incorrect requires reconsideration.Rajamanickamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07384892101497455563noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post-2685414970564904112015-09-02T20:49:07.950+05:302015-09-02T20:49:07.950+05:30SIR, I AM EX. SGT.UNNIKRISHNAN RELEASED IN 1994 AF...SIR, I AM EX. SGT.UNNIKRISHNAN RELEASED IN 1994 AFTER 15 YEARS OF SERVICE AND I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW AM I ELIGIBLE FOR THE PRE 2006 PENSION ARREARS AS PER THE HONORABLE SUPREME COURT ORDER. I ALSO THANK GP CAPT.GANDHI SIR FOR THIS VALUABLE INFORMATION.EX SGT UNNIKRISHNANnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post-45275309574895150662015-07-31T09:36:49.028+05:302015-07-31T09:36:49.028+05:30Sir Govt has now issued orders for central Govt em...Sir Govt has now issued orders for central Govt employees to issue arrears wef 01/01/2006 .Ireuest Gp Capt. Gandhi Sir to look into /study the Govt letter please. No 38/37/08-P& PW(A)GOVT OF INDIA MINISTARY OF PERSONNEL,PG & Pensions Dept Of pensions & pensioners welfare.Sudesh KUMAR BHARDWAJhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17919532274213560530noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post-30605615916695964732015-07-28T17:51:40.747+05:302015-07-28T17:51:40.747+05:301. I, 2879637W Ex Havildar & Honorary Naib Sub...1. I, 2879637W Ex Havildar & Honorary Naib Subedar VIJAI KUMAR have served in Army for 24 years and 02 days and retired on 31 October 2006 (A/N). I have been granted the rank of Honorary Naib Subedar with effect from 01 November 2006 on the republic day of 2007. My original PPO No is S/029763/2006 (ARMY).<br /><br />2. It is intimated that I am drawing my service pension from your bank vide bank account No - 2994001301104170 @ Rs 7750/- basic pension vide my P.P.O. No S/CORR/039335/2010 (ARMY) dated 19 October 2010 and subsequent corrigendum PPOs issued by PCDA (P), Allahabad in this regard time to time. I have 24 years of qualifying service at my credit and was pensioned with sanction and payment of my all retrial benefits by taking into account of notional pay applicable for Honorary Naib Subedar in Y pay group in PB-2 pay band of Rs 9300 - 34800 + Grade Pay of Rs 4200 + MSP of Rs 2000. My last basic pay was Rs 4700/- in pre revised pay scale of Rs 3600 - 100 - 5100 in Y pay group in the rank of Havildar. In this regard, I wish to submit that I am fully entitled & eligible to get the pension of regular Naib Subedar in Y pay group. This is conformity of recommendation of 6th CPC in which it is provided that Honorary Naib Subedars are entitled to get pension equivalent to regular Naib Subedar of the same group. Further, PCDA(P) circular No 471 dated 30 September 2011 confirmed the same thing and moreover, the same issue has been decided by Apex Court in SLP cc No - 42/2010 in case of UOI & other V/s Honorary Naib Subedar Sh. Kanwal Singh. Similar judgments were also delivered by AFT, Chandigarh on 27 October 2010 in OA No - 691/2010 in the case of Sh Subha Chand Sheoran & others V/s UOI & others and subsequently AFT, Jaipur also gave similar decision on 11 January 2011 in case of Honorary Naib Subedar Dharampal & others V/s UOI & others vide OA No - 160/2010.<br /> <br />3. The, being more beneficial, my service pension is subjected to revision with effect from 01 November 2006 @ Rs 8577/- per month in the rank of Honorary Naib Subedar in Y pay group according to provisions contained in Paras No 6.1 & 6.2 of PCDA(P) circular No 397 dated 18 November 2008 (scan of circular No 397 attached as attachment) giving provision that pension in no case shall be lower than 50% of the minimum of pay in pay band + GP + MSP applicable and introduced from 01 January 2006 corresponding to pre-revised scale from which the pensioner had retired for 33 years of maximum qualifying service.<br /><br />4. According to the above, my last basic pay drawn of Havildar rank in Y pay group is corresponding to last basic pay of Rs 7160/- in the rank of Naib Subedar in Y pay group. According to fitment table issued by Special Army Instruction – 1/S/2008(table attached as attachment), total revised pay including pay in pay band of Rs 13320 + GP of Rs 4200 + MSP of Rs 2000 = Total revised pay = Rs 19520, which is corresponding of pre-revised pay of Rs 7160. Consequently my revised pension with effect from 01 November 2006 by modified parity method is computed as under:<br />50% of Rs 19520 = Rs 9760 x Q.S of 24 years + 05 years weightage = /33 = 9760x29/33= Rs 8577/- per month with effect from 01 November 2006.<br /><br />5. That as per instructions issued in last para of 6.2 & para No – 14.1 of above circular 397 dated 18 November 2008 and para 13.1 of circular No – 430 dated 10 March 2010, you are fully authorised to revise my pension & payment of arrear of pension accordingly and as desired by me.<br /><br />6. That my pension is further subjected to revision from Rs 8577/- to Rs 9382/- per month vide table No 32 of PCDA(P) circular No 430 dated 10 March 2010 for the rank of Honorary Naib Subedar in Y pay group.<br /><br />7. In view of the above my pension should be revised from Rs 7750/- to Rs 8577/- per month w.e.f. 01 November 2006 and from Rs 8577/- to Rs 9382/- per month w.e.f. 01 July 2009. <br />vijai kumar dudihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12339778500933957303noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post-75889219086883969542015-07-13T10:31:04.609+05:302015-07-13T10:31:04.609+05:30DEAR MBC sir for arrears of pre 2006, i think sepe...DEAR MBC sir for arrears of pre 2006, i think seperate sanction is not reqd <br />it is as per 6cpc and that is accepted by govt. but we may have to challenge the order of denying the arrears which is contrary to the 6cpc recom accepted by govt.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post-81863170116682008892015-06-17T20:33:47.284+05:302015-06-17T20:33:47.284+05:30Yes mr jaitly is saitan and S C is our God. These ...Yes mr jaitly is saitan and S C is our God. These Saitans of Ministry of Finance And ministry of Pensioners has to punish the concerned for the curse of Retiered pensioners By the Almighty GodAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04776173426937613904noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post-42097816454248002442015-05-28T15:17:13.428+05:302015-05-28T15:17:13.428+05:30dear mr. MBC yesterday DM has told that a formula ...dear mr. MBC yesterday DM has told that a formula has been prepared for OROP<br />(malayalam news at1925 hrs)<br /> Seems to be a dilution did any thing come outAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post-68102298444088180312015-05-23T19:07:26.644+05:302015-05-23T19:07:26.644+05:30it seems to be another mimicsit seems to be another mimicsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post-73900678864222986882015-05-23T07:21:02.499+05:302015-05-23T07:21:02.499+05:30dear chandran is there any orders issued by sc reg...dear chandran is there any orders issued by sc regarding the dismissal of slps?<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post-81863844184029142502015-05-15T10:00:56.898+05:302015-05-15T10:00:56.898+05:30 chandran sir, On 17 march SC has dismissed the sl... chandran sir, On 17 march SC has dismissed the slps , Did the sc issue orders for that effect? if not why the hon sc is delaying the written order for the judgement.?<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817212952570625353.post-19294421818202944462015-04-19T16:30:58.834+05:302015-04-19T16:30:58.834+05:30Sir,I am a pre 2006 retired NbSub after 21 years o...Sir,I am a pre 2006 retired NbSub after 21 years of service in the army.SC order is effective to me or not. Reply please.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com